Search Results (103397 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-6023 1 Grafana 1 Grafana 2026-04-15 7.6 High
An open redirect vulnerability has been identified in Grafana OSS that can be exploited to achieve XSS attacks. The vulnerability was introduced in Grafana v11.5.0. The open redirect can be chained with path traversal vulnerabilities to achieve XSS. Fixed in versions 12.0.2+security-01, 11.6.3+security-01, 11.5.6+security-01, 11.4.6+security-01 and 11.3.8+security-01
CVE-2025-32992 2026-04-15 8.5 High
Thermo Fisher Scientific ePort through 3.0.0 has Incorrect Access Control.
CVE-2025-50891 2026-04-15 7.2 High
The server-side backend for Adform Site Tracking before 2025-08-28 allows attackers to inject HTML or execute arbitrary code via cookie hijacking. NOTE: a customer does not need to take any action to update locally installed software (such as Adform Site Tracking 1.1).
CVE-2025-40217 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-04-15 7.0 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pidfs: validate extensible ioctls Validate extensible ioctls stricter than we do now.
CVE-2025-40595 1 Sonicwall 1 Sma1000 2026-04-15 7.2 High
A Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface. By using an encoded URL, a remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially cause the appliance to make requests to unintended location.
CVE-2025-40220 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-04-15 7.0 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fuse: fix livelock in synchronous file put from fuseblk workers I observed a hang when running generic/323 against a fuseblk server. This test opens a file, initiates a lot of AIO writes to that file descriptor, and closes the file descriptor before the writes complete. Unsurprisingly, the AIO exerciser threads are mostly stuck waiting for responses from the fuseblk server: # cat /proc/372265/task/372313/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_do_getattr+0xfc/0x1f0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_read_iter+0xbe/0x1c0 [fuse] [<0>] aio_read+0x130/0x1e0 [<0>] io_submit_one+0x542/0x860 [<0>] __x64_sys_io_submit+0x98/0x1a0 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x37/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 But the /weird/ part is that the fuseblk server threads are waiting for responses from itself: # cat /proc/372210/task/372232/stack [<0>] request_wait_answer+0x1fe/0x2a0 [fuse] [<0>] __fuse_simple_request+0xd3/0x2b0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_file_put+0x9a/0xd0 [fuse] [<0>] fuse_release+0x36/0x50 [fuse] [<0>] __fput+0xec/0x2b0 [<0>] task_work_run+0x55/0x90 [<0>] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xe9/0x100 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 The fuseblk server is fuse2fs so there's nothing all that exciting in the server itself. So why is the fuse server calling fuse_file_put? The commit message for the fstest sheds some light on that: "By closing the file descriptor before calling io_destroy, you pretty much guarantee that the last put on the ioctx will be done in interrupt context (during I/O completion). Aha. AIO fgets a new struct file from the fd when it queues the ioctx. The completion of the FUSE_WRITE command from userspace causes the fuse server to call the AIO completion function. The completion puts the struct file, queuing a delayed fput to the fuse server task. When the fuse server task returns to userspace, it has to run the delayed fput, which in the case of a fuseblk server, it does synchronously. Sending the FUSE_RELEASE command sychronously from fuse server threads is a bad idea because a client program can initiate enough simultaneous AIOs such that all the fuse server threads end up in delayed_fput, and now there aren't any threads left to handle the queued fuse commands. Fix this by only using asynchronous fputs when closing files, and leave a comment explaining why.
CVE-2025-41413 2026-04-15 7.8 High
Fuji Electric Smart EditorĀ is vulnerable to an out-of-bounds write, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2025-30090 1 Squirrelmail 1 Squirrelmail 2026-04-15 7.2 High
mime.php in SquirrelMail through 1.4.23-svn-20250401 and 1.5.x through 1.5.2-svn-20250401 allows XSS via e-mail headers, because JavaScript payloads are mishandled after $encoded has been set to true.
CVE-2024-45317 1 Sonicwall 1 Sma1000 2026-04-15 7.5 High
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SMA1000 appliance firmware versions 12.4.3-02676 and earlier allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause the SMA1000 server-side application to make requests to an unintended IP address.
CVE-2025-20620 2026-04-15 7.5 High
SQL Injection vulnerability exists in STEALTHONE D220/D340 provided by Y'S corporation. An attacker who can access the affected product may obtain the administrative password of the web management page.
CVE-2019-25350 1 Xmedia Recode 1 Xmedia Recode 2026-04-15 7.5 High
XMedia Recode 3.4.8.6 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to crash the application by loading a specially crafted .m3u playlist file. Attackers can create a malicious .m3u file with an oversized buffer to trigger an application crash when the file is opened.
CVE-2019-25351 1 Centova Technologies Inc. 1 Centova Cast 2026-04-15 8.8 High
Centova Cast 3.2.11 contains a file download vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to retrieve arbitrary system files through the server.copyfile API endpoint. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability by supplying crafted parameters to download sensitive files like /etc/passwd using curl and wget requests.
CVE-2019-25352 1 Genivia 1 Crystal Live Http Server 2026-04-15 7.5 High
Crystal Live HTTP Server 6.01 contains a directory traversal vulnerability that allows remote attackers to access system files by manipulating URL path segments. Attackers can use multiple '../' sequences to navigate outside the web root and retrieve sensitive configuration files like Windows system files.
CVE-2019-25353 1 Diy Security 1 Foscam Video Management System 2026-04-15 7.5 High
Foscam Video Management System 1.1.4.9 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the username input field that allows attackers to crash the application. Attackers can overwrite the username with a 520-byte buffer of repeated 'A' characters to trigger an application crash during device login.
CVE-2024-34533 1 Odoo 1 Odoo 2026-04-15 7.3 High
A SQL injection vulnerability in ZI PT Solusi Usaha Mudah Analytic Data Query module (aka izi_data) 11.0 through 17.x before 17.0.3 allows a remote attacker to gain privileges via a query to IZITools::query_check, IZITools::query_fetch, or IZITools::query_execute.
CVE-2024-6125 2026-04-15 8.1 High
The Login with phone number plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized password resets in versions up to, and including 1.7.34. This is due to the plugin generating too weak a reset code, and the code used to reset the password has no attempt or time limit. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the password of arbitrary users by guessing a 6-digit numeric reset code.
CVE-2024-6655 1 Redhat 1 Enterprise Linux 2026-04-15 7 High
A flaw was found in the GTK library. Under certain conditions, it is possible for a library to be injected into a GTK application from the current working directory.
CVE-2025-58776 1 Keyence 1 Kv Studio 2026-04-15 7.8 High
KV Studio versions 12.23 and prior contain a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability. If the product uses a specially crafted file, arbitrary code may be executed on the affected product.
CVE-2025-8309 1 Manageengine 3 Assetexplorer, Servicedesk Plus, Supportcenter Plus 2026-04-15 8.1 High
There is an improper privilege management vulnerability identified in ManageEngine's Asset Explorer, ServiceDesk Plus, ServiceDesk Plus MSP, and SupportCenter Plus products by Zohocorp. This vulnerability impacts Asset Explorer versions before 7710, ServiceDesk Plus versions before 15110, ServiceDesk Plus MSP versions before 14940, and SupportCenter Plus versions before 14940.
CVE-2024-1226 1 Rejetto 1 Http File Server 2026-04-15 7.5 High
The software does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes certain characters before the data is included in outgoing HTTP headers. The inclusion of invalidated data in an HTTP header allows an attacker to specify the full HTTP response represented by the browser. An attacker could control the response and craft attacks such as cross-site scripting and cache poisoning attacks.