Filtered by vendor Nodejs
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Node.js
Subscriptions
Total
157 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-32004 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2025-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been discovered in Node.js version 20, specifically within the experimental permission model. This flaw relates to improper handling of Buffers in file system APIs causing a traversal path to bypass when verifying file permissions. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental permission model in Node.js 20. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32003 | 2 Fedoraproject, Nodejs | 2 Fedora, Node.js | 2025-02-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| `fs.mkdtemp()` and `fs.mkdtempSync()` can be used to bypass the permission model check using a path traversal attack. This flaw arises from a missing check in the fs.mkdtemp() API and the impact is a malicious actor could create an arbitrary directory. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental permission model in Node.js 20. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32002 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 4 Node.js, Nodejs, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| The use of `Module._load()` can bypass the policy mechanism and require modules outside of the policy.json definition for a given module. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 16.x, 18.x and, 20.x. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js. | ||||
| CVE-2023-30590 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 3 Node.js, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| The generateKeys() API function returned from crypto.createDiffieHellman() only generates missing (or outdated) keys, that is, it only generates a private key if none has been set yet, but the function is also needed to compute the corresponding public key after calling setPrivateKey(). However, the documentation says this API call: "Generates private and public Diffie-Hellman key values". The documented behavior is very different from the actual behavior, and this difference could easily lead to security issues in applications that use these APIs as the DiffieHellman may be used as the basis for application-level security, implications are consequently broad. | ||||
| CVE-2023-30588 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 3 Node.js, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2025-02-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| When an invalid public key is used to create an x509 certificate using the crypto.X509Certificate() API a non-expect termination occurs making it susceptible to DoS attacks when the attacker could force interruptions of application processing, as the process terminates when accessing public key info of provided certificates from user code. The current context of the users will be gone, and that will cause a DoS scenario. This vulnerability affects all active Node.js versions v16, v18, and, v20. | ||||
| CVE-2023-30586 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Node.js 20 that allowed loading arbitrary OpenSSL engines when the experimental permission model is enabled, which can bypass and/or disable the permission model. The attack complexity is high. However, the crypto.setEngine() API can be used to bypass the permission model when called with a compatible OpenSSL engine. The OpenSSL engine can, for example, disable the permission model in the host process by manipulating the process's stack memory to locate the permission model Permission::enabled_ in the host process's heap memory. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9515 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 36 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 33 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9513 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 25 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 22 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9514 | 13 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 10 more | 44 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 41 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9518 | 11 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 8 more | 26 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 23 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9516 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 24 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 21 more | 2025-01-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9511 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 29 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 26 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9517 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 28 Http Server, Traffic Server, Mac Os X and 25 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2018-12121 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 9 Node.js, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 6 more | 2024-12-27 | 7.5 High |
| Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0, 8.14.0, 10.14.0 and 11.3.0: Denial of Service with large HTTP headers: By using a combination of many requests with maximum sized headers (almost 80 KB per connection), and carefully timed completion of the headers, it is possible to cause the HTTP server to abort from heap allocation failure. Attack potential is mitigated by the use of a load balancer or other proxy layer. | ||||
| CVE-2018-12123 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 2 Node.js, Rhel Software Collections | 2024-12-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0, 8.14.0, 10.14.0 and 11.3.0: Hostname spoofing in URL parser for javascript protocol: If a Node.js application is using url.parse() to determine the URL hostname, that hostname can be spoofed by using a mixed case "javascript:" (e.g. "javAscript:") protocol (other protocols are not affected). If security decisions are made about the URL based on the hostname, they may be incorrect. | ||||
| CVE-2018-12122 | 3 Nodejs, Redhat, Suse | 5 Node.js, Rhel Software Collections, Suse Enterprise Storage and 2 more | 2024-12-13 | 7.5 High |
| Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0, 8.14.0, 10.14.0 and 11.3.0: Slowloris HTTP Denial of Service: An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending headers very slowly keeping HTTP or HTTPS connections and associated resources alive for a long period of time. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32558 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| The use of the deprecated API `process.binding()` can bypass the permission model through path traversal. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental permission model in Node.js 20.x. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the permission model is an experimental feature of Node.js. | ||||
| CVE-2023-30585 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in the Node.js (.msi version) installation process, specifically affecting Windows users who install Node.js using the .msi installer. This vulnerability emerges during the repair operation, where the "msiexec.exe" process, running under the NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM context, attempts to read the %USERPROFILE% environment variable from the current user's registry. The issue arises when the path referenced by the %USERPROFILE% environment variable does not exist. In such cases, the "msiexec.exe" process attempts to create the specified path in an unsafe manner, potentially leading to the creation of arbitrary folders in arbitrary locations. The severity of this vulnerability is heightened by the fact that the %USERPROFILE% environment variable in the Windows registry can be modified by standard (or "non-privileged") users. Consequently, unprivileged actors, including malicious entities or trojans, can manipulate the environment variable key to deceive the privileged "msiexec.exe" process. This manipulation can result in the creation of folders in unintended and potentially malicious locations. It is important to note that this vulnerability is specific to Windows users who install Node.js using the .msi installer. Users who opt for other installation methods are not affected by this particular issue. | ||||
| CVE-2023-30581 | 2 Nodejs, Redhat | 3 Node.js, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| The use of __proto__ in process.mainModule.__proto__.require() can bypass the policy mechanism and require modules outside of the policy.json definition. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: v16, v18 and, v20. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js | ||||
| CVE-2022-43548 | 3 Debian, Nodejs, Redhat | 5 Debian Linux, Node.js, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| A OS Command Injection vulnerability exists in Node.js versions <14.21.1, <16.18.1, <18.12.1, <19.0.1 due to an insufficient IsAllowedHost check that can easily be bypassed because IsIPAddress does not properly check if an IP address is invalid before making DBS requests allowing rebinding attacks.The fix for this issue in https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-32212 was incomplete and this new CVE is to complete the fix. | ||||