Filtered by vendor Turbolinux
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Turbolinux Server
Subscriptions
Total
26 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2004-0817 | 9 Conectiva, Enlightenment, Imagemagick and 6 more | 16 Linux, Imlib, Imlib2 and 13 more | 2024-11-20 | N/A |
Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in the imlib BMP image handler allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted BMP file. | ||||
CVE-2004-0809 | 8 Apache, Debian, Gentoo and 5 more | 12 Http Server, Debian Linux, Linux and 9 more | 2024-11-20 | N/A |
The mod_dav module in Apache 2.0.50 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (child process crash) via a certain sequence of LOCK requests for a location that allows WebDAV authoring access. | ||||
CVE-2004-0802 | 9 Conectiva, Enlightenment, Imagemagick and 6 more | 16 Linux, Imlib, Imlib2 and 13 more | 2024-11-20 | N/A |
Buffer overflow in the BMP loader in imlib2 before 1.1.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a specially-crafted BMP image, a different vulnerability than CVE-2004-0817. | ||||
CVE-2003-0694 | 12 Apple, Compaq, Freebsd and 9 more | 20 Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server, Tru64 and 17 more | 2024-11-20 | N/A |
The prescan function in Sendmail 8.12.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via buffer overflow attacks, as demonstrated using the parseaddr function in parseaddr.c. | ||||
CVE-2003-0681 | 9 Apple, Gentoo, Hp and 6 more | 15 Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server, Linux and 12 more | 2024-11-20 | N/A |
A "potential buffer overflow in ruleset parsing" for Sendmail 8.12.9, when using the nonstandard rulesets (1) recipient (2), final, or (3) mailer-specific envelope recipients, has unknown consequences. | ||||
CVE-2003-0370 | 4 Apple, Kde, Redhat and 1 more | 7 Safari, Kde, Konqueror Embedded and 4 more | 2024-11-20 | N/A |
Konqueror Embedded and KDE 2.2.2 and earlier does not validate the Common Name (CN) field for X.509 Certificates, which could allow remote attackers to spoof certificates via a man-in-the-middle attack. |