DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-4313. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2011-4313. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-4313 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services information disclosure

IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3 uses default credentials for potentially critical functionality.

Complete crash of host system due to calculateDirectorySize in skyportd

Skyport Daemon (skyportd) is the daemon for the Skyport Panel. By making thousands of folders & files (easy due to skyport's lack of rate limiting on createFolder. createFile), skyportd in a lot of cases will cause 100% CPU usage and an OOM, probably crashing the system. This is fixed in 0.2.2.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-1861. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-1861. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-1861 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1664, CVE-2013-1665. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6571. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6571. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6571 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: A public posting on 20130831 referenced this ID for a specific issue, but that issue had not been assigned this ID by any CNA. Notes: The posting will later have IDs assigned in accordance with CVE content decisions

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-3888. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-3888. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-3888 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0800. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-0800. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0800 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-12933. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-12933. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-12933 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-7250, CVE-2012-1410. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but CVE users may have associated it with multiple unrelated issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2006-7250 for the OpenSSL candidate or CVE-2012-1410 for the Kadu candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9864. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9864. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9864 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-1000067. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-1000067. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-1000067 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4207, CVE-2010-4208, CVE-2010-4209. Reason: This candidate originally combined three issues that affected different versions. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4207, CVE-2010-4208, or CVE-2010-4209 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

wireshark: DoS (infinite loop) in the SCTP dissector (wnpa-sec-2012-33)

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6056. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6056. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6056 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-5703. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-5703. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-5703 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none

Arbitrary Code Injection in Cura

UltiMaker Cura slicer versions 5.7.0-beta.1 through 5.7.2 are vulnerable to code injection via the 3MF format reader (/plugins/ThreeMFReader.py). The vulnerability arises from improper handling of the drop_to_buildplate property within 3MF files, which are ZIP archives containing the model data. When a 3MF file is loaded in Cura, the value of the drop_to_buildplate property is passed to the Python eval() function without proper sanitization, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code by crafting a malicious 3MF file. This vulnerability poses a significant risk as 3MF files are commonly shared via 3D model databases.

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by the Primary CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none

DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-7853. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-7853. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-7853 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage