Total
468 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-46324 | 2 Free5gc, Golang | 2 Udm, Go | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| pkg/suci/suci.go in free5GC udm before 1.2.0, when Go before 1.19 is used, allows an Invalid Curve Attack because it may compute a shared secret via an uncompressed public key that has not been validated. An attacker can send arbitrary SUCIs to the UDM, which tries to decrypt them via both its private key and the attacker's public key. | ||||
| CVE-2023-46234 | 3 Browserify, Debian, Redhat | 3 Browserify-sign, Debian Linux, Openshift Distributed Tracing | 2024-08-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| browserify-sign is a package to duplicate the functionality of node's crypto public key functions, much of this is based on Fedor Indutny's work on indutny/tls.js. An upper bound check issue in `dsaVerify` function allows an attacker to construct signatures that can be successfully verified by any public key, thus leading to a signature forgery attack. All places in this project that involve DSA verification of user-input signatures will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue has been patched in version 4.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44077 | 2 Apple, Studionetworksolutions | 2 Macos, Sharebrowser | 2024-08-02 | 9.8 Critical |
| Studio Network Solutions ShareBrowser before 7.0 on macOS mishandles signature verification, aka PMP-2636. | ||||
| CVE-2023-42811 | 2 Aes-gcm Project, Fedoraproject | 2 Aes-gcm, Fedora | 2024-08-02 | 4.7 Medium |
| aes-gcm is a pure Rust implementation of the AES-GCM. Starting in version 0.10.0 and prior to version 0.10.3, in the AES GCM implementation of decrypt_in_place_detached, the decrypted ciphertext (i.e. the correct plaintext) is exposed even if tag verification fails. If a program using the `aes-gcm` crate's `decrypt_in_place*` APIs accesses the buffer after decryption failure, it will contain a decryption of an unauthenticated input. Depending on the specific nature of the program this may enable Chosen Ciphertext Attacks (CCAs) which can cause a catastrophic breakage of the cipher including full plaintext recovery. Version 0.10.3 contains a fix for this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41764 | 1 Microsoft | 3 365 Apps, Office, Office Long Term Servicing Channel | 2024-08-02 | 5.5 Medium |
| Microsoft Office Spoofing Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-41337 | 1 Dena | 1 H2o | 2024-08-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| h2o is an HTTP server with support for HTTP/1.x, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3. In version 2.3.0-beta2 and prior, when h2o is configured to listen to multiple addresses or ports with each of them using different backend servers managed by multiple entities, a malicious backend entity that also has the opportunity to observe or inject packets exchanged between the client and h2o may misdirect HTTPS requests going to other backends and observe the contents of that HTTPS request being sent. The attack involves a victim client trying to resume a TLS connection and an attacker redirecting the packets to a different address or port than that intended by the client. The attacker must already have been configured by the administrator of h2o to act as a backend to one of the addresses or ports that the h2o instance listens to. Session IDs and tickets generated by h2o are not bound to information specific to the server address, port, or the X.509 certificate, and therefore it is possible for an attacker to force the victim connection to wrongfully resume against a different server address or port on which the same h2o instance is listening. Once a TLS session is misdirected to resume to a server address / port that is configured to use an attacker-controlled server as the backend, depending on the configuration, HTTPS requests from the victim client may be forwarded to the attacker's server. An H2O instance is vulnerable to this attack only if the instance is configured to listen to different addresses or ports using the listen directive at the host level and the instance is configured to connect to backend servers managed by multiple entities. A patch is available at commit 35760540337a47e5150da0f4a66a609fad2ef0ab. As a workaround, one may stop using using host-level listen directives in favor of global-level ones. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40727 | 1 Siemens | 1 Qms Automotive | 2024-08-02 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in QMS Automotive (All versions < V12.39). The QMS.Mobile module of the affected application uses weak outdated application signing mechanism. This could allow an attacker to tamper the application code. | ||||
| CVE-2023-35373 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Mono | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| Mono Authenticode Validation Spoofing Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-34435 | 2 Level1, Realtek | 3 Wbr-6013, Wbr-6013 Firmware, Rtl819x Jungle Software Development Kit | 2024-08-02 | 7.2 High |
| A firmware update vulnerability exists in the boa formUpload functionality of Realtek rtl819x Jungle SDK v3.4.11. A specially crafted network packets can lead to arbitrary firmware update. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34205 | 1 Moov | 1 Signedxml | 2024-08-02 | 9.1 Critical |
| In Moov signedxml through 1.0.0, parsing the raw XML (as received) can result in different output than parsing the canonicalized XML. Thus, signature validation can be bypassed via a Signature Wrapping attack (aka XSW). | ||||
| CVE-2023-34058 | 5 Debian, Fedoraproject, Microsoft and 2 more | 10 Debian Linux, Fedora, Windows and 7 more | 2024-08-02 | 7.1 High |
| VMware Tools contains a SAML token signature bypass vulnerability. A malicious actor that has been granted Guest Operation Privileges https://docs.vmware.com/en/VMware-vSphere/8.0/vsphere-security/GUID-6A952214-0E5E-4CCF-9D2A-90948FF643EC.html in a target virtual machine may be able to elevate their privileges if that target virtual machine has been assigned a more privileged Guest Alias https://vdc-download.vmware.com/vmwb-repository/dcr-public/d1902b0e-d479-46bf-8ac9-cee0e31e8ec0/07ce8dbd-db48-4261-9b8f-c6d3ad8ba472/vim.vm.guest.AliasManager.html . | ||||
| CVE-2023-33959 | 1 Notaryproject | 1 Notation-go | 2024-08-02 | 8.4 High |
| notation is a CLI tool to sign and verify OCI artifacts and container images. An attacker who has compromised a registry can cause users to verify the wrong artifact. The problem has been fixed in the release v1.0.0-rc.6. Users should upgrade their notation-go library to v1.0.0-rc.6 or above. Users unable to upgrade may restrict container registries to a set of secure and trusted container registries. | ||||
| CVE-2023-33185 | 1 Django-ses Project | 1 Django-ses | 2024-08-02 | 4.6 Medium |
| Django-SES is a drop-in mail backend for Django. The django_ses library implements a mail backend for Django using AWS Simple Email Service. The library exports the `SESEventWebhookView class` intended to receive signed requests from AWS to handle email bounces, subscriptions, etc. These requests are signed by AWS and are verified by django_ses, however the verification of this signature was found to be flawed as it allowed users to specify arbitrary public certificates. This issue was patched in version 3.5.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42459 | 2 Elliptic Project, Redhat | 4 Elliptic, Acm, Multicluster Engine and 1 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, EDDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing signature length check, and thus zero-valued bytes can be removed or appended. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32449 | 1 Dell | 11 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 8 more | 2024-08-02 | 7.2 High |
| Dell PowerStore versions prior to 3.5 contain an improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability. An attacker can trick a high privileged user to install a malicious binary by bypassing the existing cryptographic signature checks | ||||
| CVE-2023-28818 | 1 Veritas | 2 Aptare It Analytics, Netbackup It Analytics | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics 11 before 11.2.0. The application upgrade process included unsigned files that could be exploited and result in a customer installing unauthentic components. A malicious actor could install rogue Collector executable files (aptare.jar or upgrademanager.zip) on the Portal server, which might then be downloaded and installed on collectors. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28602 | 1 Zoom | 1 Zoom | 2024-08-02 | 2.8 Low |
| Zoom for Windows clients prior to 5.13.5 contain an improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability. A malicious user may potentially downgrade Zoom Client components to previous versions. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28226 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| Windows Enroll Engine Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-28113 | 1 Russh Project | 1 Russh | 2024-08-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Starting in version 0.34.0 and prior to versions 0.36.2 and 0.37.1, Diffie-Hellman key validation is insufficient, which can lead to insecure shared secrets and therefore breaks confidentiality. Connections between a russh client and server or those of a russh peer with some other misbehaving peer are most likely to be problematic. These may vulnerable to eavesdropping. Most other implementations reject such keys, so this is mainly an interoperability issue in such a case. This issue is fixed in versions 0.36.2 and 0.37.1 | ||||
| CVE-2023-25718 | 1 Connectwise | 1 Control | 2024-08-02 | 9.8 Critical |
| In ConnectWise Control through 22.9.10032 (formerly known as ScreenConnect), after an executable file is signed, additional instructions can be added without invalidating the signature, such as instructions that result in offering the end user a (different) attacker-controlled executable file. It is plausible that the end user may allow the download and execution of this file to proceed. There are ConnectWise Control configuration options that add mitigations. NOTE: this may overlap CVE-2023-25719. NOTE: the vendor's position is that this purported vulnerability represents a "fundamental lack of understanding of Authenticode code signing behavior." | ||||