Moodle: ssrf risk due to insufficient check on the curl blocked hosts

An issue in the logic used to check 0.0.0.0 against the cURL blocked hosts lists resulted in an SSRF risk. This flaw affects Moodle versions 4.2, 4.1 to 4.1.3, 4.0 to 4.0.8, 3.11 to 3.11.14, 3.9 to 3.9.21 and earlier unsupported versions.

PiiGAB M-Bus Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort

PiiGAB M-Bus stores passwords using a weak hash algorithm.

Blind SSRF When Uploading Presentation in BigBlueButton

BigBlueButton is an open source virtual classroom designed to help teachers teach and learners learn. In affected versions are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. In an `insertDocument` API request the user is able to supply a URL from which the presentation should be downloaded. This URL was being used without having been successfully validated first. An update to the `followRedirect` method in the `PresentationUrlDownloadService` has been made to validate all URLs to be used for presentation download. Two new properties `presentationDownloadSupportedProtocols` and `presentationDownloadBlockedHosts` have also been added to `bigbluebutton.properties` to allow administrators to define what protocols a URL must use and to explicitly define hosts that a presentation cannot be downloaded from. All URLs passed to `insertDocument` must conform to the requirements of the two previously mentioned properties. Additionally, these URLs must resolve to valid addresses, and these addresses must not be local or loopback addresses. There are no workarounds. Users are advised to upgrade to a patched version of BigBlueButton.

IBM Maximo Spatial Asset Management server-side request forgery

IBM Maximo Spatial Asset Management 8.10 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 255288.

Apache Jena: Exposure of execution in script engine expressions.

There is insufficient restrictions of called script functions in Apache Jena versions 4.8.0 and earlier. It allows a remote user to execute javascript via a SPARQL query. This issue affects Apache Jena: from 3.7.0 through 4.8.0.

JIZHICMS TemplateController.php index server-side request forgery

A vulnerability was found in JIZHICMS 2.4.5. It has been classified as critical. Affected is the function index of the file TemplateController.php. The manipulation of the argument webapi leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-230082 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability.

IBM Sterling Connect:Express for UNIX server-side request forgery

IBM Sterling Connect:Express for UNIX 1.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 252135.

The Request package through 2.88.1 for Node.js allows a bypass of SSRF mitigations via an attacker-controller server that does a cross-protocol redirect (HTTP to HTTPS, or HTTPS to HTTP). NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

WordPress Instant Images Plugin <= 5.1.0.2 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Darren Cooney Instant Images plugin <= 5.1.0.2 versions.

External service lookups for a number of protocols were vulnerable to a time-of-check/time-of-use (TOCTOU) weakness, involving the JDK DNS cache. Attackers that were timing DNS cache expiry correctly were able to inject configuration that would bypass existing network deny-lists. Attackers could exploit this weakness to discover the existence of restricted network infrastructure and service availability. Improvements were made to include deny-lists not only during the check of the provided connection data, but also during use. No publicly available exploits are known.

It was possible to call filesystem and network references using the local LibreOffice instance using manipulated ODT documents. Attackers could discover restricted network topology and services as well as including local files with read permissions of the open-xchange system user. This was limited to specific file-types, like images. We have improved existing content filters and validators to avoid including any local resources. No publicly available exploits are known.

IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses did not get recognized as "local" by the code and a connection attempt is made. Attackers with access to user accounts could use this to bypass existing deny-list functionality and trigger requests to restricted network infrastructure to gain insight about topology and running services. We now respect possible IPV4-mapped IPv6 addresses when checking if contained in a deny-list. No publicly available exploits are known.

Server-Side Request Forgery in Apache ShenYu

There exists an SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) vulnerability located at the /sandbox/proxyGateway endpoint. This vulnerability allows us to manipulate arbitrary requests and retrieve corresponding responses by inputting any URL into the requestUrl parameter. Of particular concern is our ability to exert control over the HTTP method, cookies, IP address, and headers. This effectively grants us the capability to dispatch complete HTTP requests to hosts of our choosing. This issue affects Apache ShenYu: 2.5.1. Upgrade to Apache ShenYu 2.6.0 or apply patch  https://github.com/apache/shenyu/pull/4776  .

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability [CWE-918] in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer GUI 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, 6.4.8 through 6.4.11 may allow a remote and authenticated attacker to access unauthorized files and services on the system via specially crafted web requests.

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in loonflow r2.0.14 allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via manipulation of the hook_url parameter.

Apache Fineract: SSRF template type vulnerability in certain authenticated users

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Fineract. Authorized users with limited permissions can gain access to server and may be able to use server for any outbound traffic.  This issue affects Apache Fineract: from 1.4 through 1.8.3.

Server side request forgery in api checker

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in API checker of Pandora FMS. Application does not have a check on the URL scheme used while retrieving API URL. Rather than validating the http/https scheme, the application allows other scheme such as file, which could allow a malicious user to fetch internal file content. This issue affects Pandora FMS v767 version and prior versions on all platforms.

Server-side Request Forgery vulnerability in Western Digital My Cloud, My Cloud Home and SanDisk ibi products

Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow a rogue server on the local network to modify its URL using another DNS address to point back to the loopback adapter. This could then allow the URL to exploit other vulnerabilities on the local server. This was addressed by fixing DNS addresses that refer to loopback. This issue affects My Cloud OS 5 devices before 5.27.161, My Cloud Home, My Cloud Home Duo and SanDisk ibi devices before 9.5.1-104. 

Cisco Unified Intelligence Center Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to collect sensitive information or perform a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack on an affected system. Cisco plans to release software updates that address these vulnerabilities.

A vulnerability in Cisco TelePresence CE and RoomOS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to bypass access controls and conduct an SSRF attack through an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request to a user of the web application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send arbitrary network requests that are sourced from the affected system.