Search

Search Results (314493 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-20350 2025-10-15 7.5 High
A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco Desk Phone 9800 Series, Cisco IP Phone 7800 and 8800 Series, and Cisco Video Phone 8875 running Cisco SIP Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a DoS condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to a buffer overflow when an affected device processes HTTP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP input to the device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. Note: To exploit this vulnerability, the phone must be registered to Cisco Unified Communications Manager and have Web Access enabled. Web Access is disabled by default.
CVE-2024-12362 1 Invoiceplane 1 Invoiceplane 2025-10-15 4.3 Medium
A vulnerability was found in InvoicePlane up to 1.6.1. It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function download of the file invoices.php. The manipulation of the argument invoice leads to path traversal. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.6.2-beta-1 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product.
CVE-2025-20329 2025-10-15 4.9 Medium
A vulnerability in the logging component of Cisco TelePresence Collaboration Endpoint (CE) and Cisco RoomOS Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive information in clear text on an affected system. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. This vulnerability exists because certain unencrypted credentials are stored when SIP media component logging is enabled. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing the audit logs on an affected system and obtaining credentials to which they may not normally have access. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to use those credentials to access confidential information, some of which may contain personally identifiable information (PII). Note: To access the logs that are stored in the Webex Cloud or stored on the device itself, an attacker must have valid administrative credentials.
CVE-2024-56709 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-10-15 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring: check if iowq is killed before queuing task work can be executed after the task has gone through io_uring termination, whether it's the final task_work run or the fallback path. In this case, task work will find ->io_wq being already killed and null'ed, which is a problem if it then tries to forward the request to io_queue_iowq(). Make io_queue_iowq() fail requests in this case. Note that it also checks PF_KTHREAD, because the user can first close a DEFER_TASKRUN ring and shortly after kill the task, in which case ->iowq check would race.
CVE-2024-56713 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-10-15 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: netdevsim: fix nsim_pp_hold_write() nsim_pp_hold_write() has two problems: 1) It may return with rtnl held, as found by syzbot. 2) Its return value does not propagate an error if any.
CVE-2024-56714 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-10-15 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ionic: no double destroy workqueue There are some FW error handling paths that can cause us to try to destroy the workqueue more than once, so let's be sure we're checking for that. The case where this popped up was in an AER event where the handlers got called in such a way that ionic_reset_prepare() and thus ionic_dev_teardown() got called twice in a row. The second time through the workqueue was already destroyed, and destroy_workqueue() choked on the bad wq pointer. We didn't hit this in AER handler testing before because at that time we weren't using a private workqueue. Later we replaced the use of the system workqueue with our own private workqueue but hadn't rerun the AER handler testing since then.
CVE-2024-13211 1 Singmr 1 Houserent 2025-10-15 6.3 Medium
A vulnerability was found in SingMR HouseRent 1.0. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file src/main/java/com/house/wym/controller/AdminController.java. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
CVE-2025-55080 2025-10-15 N/A
In Eclipse ThreadX before 6.4.3, when memory protection is enabled, syscall parameters verification wasn't enough, allowing an attacker to obtain an arbitrary memory read/write.
CVE-2024-13212 1 Singmr 1 Houserent 2025-10-15 6.3 Medium
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in SingMR HouseRent 1.0. This affects the function singleUpload/upload of the file src/main/java/com/house/wym/controller/AddHouseController.java. The manipulation of the argument file leads to unrestricted upload. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
CVE-2024-26008 1 Fortinet 4 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy and 1 more 2025-10-15 5 Medium
An improper check or handling of exceptional conditions vulnerability [CWE-703] in FortiOS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.3 and before 7.2.7, FortiProxy version 7.4.0 through 7.4.3 and before 7.2.9, FortiPAM before 1.2.0 and FortiSwitchManager version 7.2.0 through 7.2.3 and version 7.0.0 through 7.0.3 fgfm daemon may allow an unauthenticated attacker to repeatedly reset the fgfm connection via crafted SSL encrypted TCP requests.
CVE-2024-33507 1 Fortinet 1 Fortiisolator 2025-10-15 7 High
An insufficient session expiration vulnerability [CWE-613] and an incorrect authorization vulnerability [CWE-863] in FortiIsolator 2.4.0 through 2.4.4, 2.3 all versions, 2.2.0, 2.1 all versions, 2.0 all versions authentication mechanism may allow remote unauthenticated attacker to deauthenticate logged in admins via crafted cookie and remote authenticated read-only attacker to gain write privilege via crafted cookie.
CVE-2024-47569 1 Fortinet 12 Fortimail, Fortimanager, Fortimanager Cloud and 9 more 2025-10-15 4.2 Medium
A insertion of sensitive information into sent data in Fortinet FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, FortiVoice 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, 6.4.0 through 6.4.9, 6.0.7 through 6.0.12, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.9, FortiOS 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.0.0 through 7.0.15, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, 6.2.0 through 6.2.17, 6.0.0 through 6.0.18, FortiWeb 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, 6.4.0 through 6.4.3, FortiRecorder 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.4, FortiNDR 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, 7.1.0 through 7.1.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.7, 1.5.0 through 1.5.3, FortiPAM 1.3.0 through 1.3.1, 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiTester 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.3.0 through 7.3.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.1.0 through 7.1.1, 7.0.0, 4.2.0 through 4.2.1, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, 7.0.0 through 7.0.21, 2.0.0 through 2.0.14, 1.2.0 through 1.2.13, 1.1.0 through 1.1.6, 1.0.0 through 1.0.7, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.1 through 7.4.3 allows attacker to disclose sensitive information via specially crafted packets.
CVE-2024-48891 1 Fortinet 2 Fortisoar, Fortisoaron-premise 2025-10-15 6.6 Medium
An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] in FortiSOAR 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.5.0 through 7.5.1, 7.4 all versions, 7.3 all versions may allow an attacker who has already obtained a non-login low privileged shell access (via another hypothetical vulnerability) to perform a local privilege escalation via crafted commands.
CVE-2024-50571 1 Fortinet 6 Fortianalyzer, Fortianalyzer Cloud, Fortimanager and 3 more 2025-10-15 6.5 Medium
A heap-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, 7.0.0 through 7.0.16, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, 6.2.0 through 6.2.17, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2, 7.4.1 through 7.4.5, 7.2.1 through 7.2.8, 7.0.1 through 7.0.13, 6.4.1 through 6.4.7, FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.5, 7.2.1 through 7.2.8, 7.0.1 through 7.0.13, 6.4.1 through 6.4.7, FortiProxy 7.6.0, 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, 7.0.0 through 7.0.19, 2.0.0 through 2.0.14, 1.2.0 through 1.2.13, 1.1.0 through 1.1.6, 1.0.0 through 1.0.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, 6.2.0 through 6.2.13, 6.0.0 through 6.0.12, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, 7.2.0 through 7.2.9, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, 6.2.0 through 6.2.13, 6.0.0 through 6.0.12 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted requests.
CVE-2025-22258 1 Fortinet 5 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy and 2 more 2025-10-15 5.7 Medium
A heap-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiSRA 1.5.0, 1.4.0 through 1.4.2, FortiPAM 1.5.0, 1.4.0 through 1.4.2, 1.3.0 through 1.3.1, 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, 7.0.2 through 7.0.16, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.1 through 7.2.5 allows attackers to escalate their privilege via specially crafted http requests.
CVE-2025-25252 1 Fortinet 1 Fortios 2025-10-15 4.3 Medium
An Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability [CWE-613] in FortiOS SSL VPN 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, 7.2.0 through 7.2.10, 7.0.0 through 7.0.16, 6.4 all versions may allow a remote attacker (e.g. a former admin whose account was removed and whose session was terminated) in possession of the SAML record of a user session to access or re-open that session via re-use of SAML record.
CVE-2025-58120 2025-10-15 7.5 High
When HTTP/2 Ingress is configured, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate.  Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
CVE-2025-62370 2025-10-15 7.5 High
Alloy Core libraries at the root of the Rust Ethereum ecosystem. Prior to 0.8.26 and 1.4.1, an uncaught panic triggered by malformed input to alloy_dyn_abi::TypedData could lead to a denial-of-service (DoS) via eip712_signing_hash(). Software with high availability requirements such as network services may be particularly impacted. If in use, external auto-restarting mechanisms can partially mitigate the availability issues unless repeated attacks are possible. The vulnerability was patched by adding a check to ensure the element is not empty before accessing its first element; an error is returned if it is empty. The fix is included in version v1.4.1 and backported to v0.8.26.
CVE-2025-57716 1 Fortinet 1 Forticlient 2025-10-15 6 Medium
An Uncontrolled Search Path Element vulnerability [CWE-427] in FortiClient Windows 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, 7.0 all versions may allow a local low privileged user to perform a DLL hijacking attack via placing a malicious DLL to the FortiClient Online Installer installation folder.
CVE-2025-59419 2025-10-15 5.3 Medium
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. In versions prior to 4.1.128.Final and 4.2.7.Final, the SMTP codec in Netty contains an SMTP command injection vulnerability due to insufficient input validation for Carriage Return (\r) and Line Feed (\n) characters in user-supplied parameters. The vulnerability exists in io.netty.handler.codec.smtp.DefaultSmtpRequest, where parameters are directly concatenated into the SMTP command string without sanitization. When methods such as SmtpRequests.rcpt(recipient) are called with a malicious string containing CRLF sequences, attackers can inject arbitrary SMTP commands. Because the injected commands are sent from the server's trusted IP address, resulting emails will likely pass SPF and DKIM authentication checks, making them appear legitimate. This allows remote attackers who can control SMTP command parameters (such as email recipients) to forge arbitrary emails from the trusted server, potentially impersonating executives and forging high-stakes corporate communications. This issue has been patched in versions 4.1.129.Final and 4.2.8.Final. No known workarounds exist.