Total
30485 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-20539 | 2024-11-06 | 4.8 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco ISE could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a stored XSS attack against a user of the interface. This vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface does not sufficiently validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious code into specific pages of the interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need valid administrative credentials on an affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51735 | 1 J3ssie | 1 Osmedeus | 2024-11-06 | N/A |
| Osmedeus is a Workflow Engine for Offensive Security. Cross-site Scripting (XSS) occurs on the Osmedues web server when viewing results from the workflow, allowing commands to be executed on the server. When using a workflow that contains the summary module, it generates reports in HTML and Markdown formats. The default report is based on the `general-template.md` template.The contents of the files are read and used to generate the report. However, the file contents are not properly filtered, leading to XSS. This may lead to commands executed on the host as well. This issue is not yet resolved. Users are advised to add their own filtering or to reach out to the developer to aid in developing a patch. | ||||
| CVE-2024-20540 | 2024-11-06 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Contact Center Management Portal (Unified CCMP) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with low privileges to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. This vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious code into a specific page of the interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive browser-based information. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have at least a Supervisor role on an affected device. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49377 | 2024-11-06 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| OctoPrint provides a web interface for controlling consumer 3D printers. OctoPrint versions up until and including 1.10.2 contain reflected XSS vulnerabilities in the login dialog and the standalone application key confirmation dialog. An attacker who successfully talked a victim into clicking on a specially crafted login link, or a malicious app running on a victim's computer triggering the application key workflow with specially crafted parameters and then redirecting the victim to the related standalone confirmation dialog could use this to retrieve or modify sensitive configuration settings, interrupt prints or otherwise interact with the OctoPrint instance in a malicious way. The above mentioned specific vulnerabilities of the login dialog and the standalone application key confirmation dialog have been patched in the bugfix release 1.10.3 by individual escaping of the detected locations. A global change throughout all of OctoPrint's templating system with the upcoming 1.11.0 release will handle this further, switching to globally enforced automatic escaping and thus reducing the attack surface in general. The latter will also improve the security of third party plugins. During a transition period, third party plugins will be able to opt into the automatic escaping. With OctoPrint 1.13.0, automatic escaping will be switched over to be enforced even for third party plugins, unless they explicitly opt-out. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51379 | 1 Jatos | 1 Jatos | 2024-11-06 | 8.4 High |
| Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability discovered in JATOS v3.9.3. The vulnerability exists in the description component of the study section, where an attacker can inject JavaScript into the description field. This allows for the execution of malicious scripts when an admin views the description, potentially leading to account takeover and unauthorized actions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51380 | 1 Jatos | 1 Jatos | 2024-11-06 | 8.4 High |
| Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability discovered in the Properties Component of JATOS v3.9.3. This flaw allows an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript into the properties section of a study, specifically within the UUID field. When an admin user accesses the study's properties, the injected script is executed in the admin's browser, which could lead to unauthorized actions, including account compromise and privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10753 | 1 Phpgurukul | 1 Online Shopping Portal | 2024-11-06 | 3.5 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in PHPGurukul Online Shopping Portal 2.0. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file admin/assets/plugins/DataTables/media/unit_testing/templates/dom_data_two_headers.php. The manipulation of the argument scripts leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41141 | 2024-11-06 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| Stored cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in EC-CUBE Web API Plugin. When there are multiple users using OAuth Management feature and one of them inputs some crafted value on the OAuth Management page, an arbitrary script may be executed on the web browser of the other user who accessed the management page. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9883 | 1 Podsfoundation | 1 Pods | 2024-11-06 | 4.8 Medium |
| The Pods WordPress plugin before 3.2.7.1 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup). | ||||
| CVE-2023-36474 | 1 Projectdiscovery | 1 Interactsh | 2024-11-06 | 8.2 High |
| Interactsh is an open-source tool for detecting out-of-band interactions. Domains configured with interactsh server prior to version 1.0.0 were vulnerable to subdomain takeover for a specific subdomain, i.e `app.` Interactsh server used to create cname entries for `app` pointing to `projectdiscovery.github.io` as default, which intended to used for hosting interactsh web client using GitHub pages. This is a security issue with a self-hosted interactsh server in which the user may not have configured a web client but still have a CNAME entry pointing to GitHub pages, making them vulnerable to subdomain takeover. This allows a threat actor to host / run arbitrary client side code (cross-site scripting) in a user's browser when browsing the vulnerable subdomain. Version 1.0.0 fixes this issue by making CNAME optional, rather than default. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20640 | 1 Cisco | 1 Security Manager | 2024-11-06 | 6.1 Medium |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Security Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross-site scripting attacks against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31971 | 1 Adtran | 2 Netvanta 3120, Netvanta 3120 Firmware | 2024-11-06 | 6.1 Medium |
| Multiple stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities on AdTran NetVanta 3120 18.01.01.00.E devices allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript, as demonstrated by /mainPassword.html, /processIdentity.html, /public.html, /dhcp.html, /private.html, /hostname.html, /connectivity.html, /NetworkMonitor.html, /trafficMonitoringConfig.html, and /wizardMain.html. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2610 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 2 more | 2024-11-06 | 6.1 Medium |
| Using a markup injection an attacker could have stolen nonce values. This could have been used to bypass strict content security policies. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 124, Firefox ESR < 115.9, and Thunderbird < 115.9. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27477 | 2024-11-06 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| In Leantime 3.0.6, a Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability exists within the ticket creation and modification functionality, allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code into the title field of tickets (also known as to-dos). This stored XSS vulnerability can be exploited to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-26473 | 2024-11-06 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SocialMediaWebsite v1.0.1 allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into the web browser of a victim via the poll parameter in poll.php. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20641 | 1 Cisco | 1 Security Manager | 2024-11-06 | 6.1 Medium |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Security Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross-site scripting attacks against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20642 | 1 Cisco | 1 Security Manager | 2024-11-06 | 6.1 Medium |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Security Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross-site scripting attacks against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20643 | 1 Cisco | 1 Security Manager | 2024-11-06 | 6.1 Medium |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Security Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross-site scripting attacks against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20644 | 1 Cisco | 1 Security Manager | 2024-11-06 | 6.1 Medium |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Security Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross-site scripting attacks against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20645 | 1 Cisco | 1 Security Manager | 2024-11-06 | 6.1 Medium |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Security Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross-site scripting attacks against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. | ||||