Search

Search Results (374295 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-65556 2 Mihche, Wordpress 2 Wpbruiser {no- Captcha Anti-spam}, Wordpress 2026-08-07 9.8 Critical
Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in WPBruiser {no- Captcha anti-Spam} <= 3.1.43 versions.
CVE-2026-65571 2 Axiomthemes, Wordpress 2 69 Clothing, Wordpress 2026-08-07 9.8 Critical
Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in 69 Clothing <= 1.2.11.1 versions.
CVE-2026-65572 2 Axiomthemes, Wordpress 2 A.williams, Wordpress 2026-08-07 9.8 Critical
Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection in A.Williams <= 1.3.1 versions.
CVE-2026-66452 2 It-recht Kanzlei, Wordpress 2 Legal Text Connector Of The It-recht Kanzlei, Wordpress 2026-08-07 6.5 Medium
Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Legal Text Connector of the IT-Recht Kanzlei <= 1.0.13 versions.
CVE-2026-66665 2 Brandexponents, Wordpress 2 Type Hub, Wordpress 2026-08-07 10 Critical
Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload in Type Hub <= 2.0.6 versions.
CVE-2026-66681 2 Jeff Farthing, Wordpress 2 Theme My Login, Wordpress 2026-08-07 4.3 Medium
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Theme My Login <= 7.1.14 versions.
CVE-2026-66683 2 Wordpress, Wp Zone 2 Wordpress, Custom Css And Javascript 2026-08-07 5.3 Medium
Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Custom CSS and JavaScript <= 2.0.16 versions.
CVE-2026-66685 2 Alex, Wordpress 2 Featured Video Plus, Wordpress 2026-08-07 5.3 Medium
Unauthenticated Sensitive Data Exposure in Featured Video Plus <= 2.3.3 versions.
CVE-2026-66686 2 Vladimir Garagulya, Wordpress 2 Plugins Garbage Collector (database Cleanup), Wordpress 2026-08-07 6.5 Medium
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Plugins Garbage Collector (Database Cleanup) <= 0.14 versions.
CVE-2026-66696 2 Nexcess, Wordpress 2 Gutenberg Blocks By Kadence Blocks, Wordpress 2026-08-07 4.3 Medium
Contributor Sensitive Data Exposure in Gutenberg Blocks by Kadence Blocks <= 3.7.8 versions.
CVE-2026-70646 1 Vovchic17 1 Aiosend 2026-08-07 7.5 High
aiosend is a synchronous and asynchronous Crypto Pay API client. Pror to version 3.0.7, `WebhookHandler.feed_update()` deserializes the entire request body before verifying the HMAC signature. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force expensive parsing of arbitrary JSON payloads that will ultimately be rejected, leading to unnecessary CPU and memory consumption. Version 3.0.7 fixes the issue. Some workarounds are available. Restrict request body size at the reverse proxy or web framework, rate-limit webhook endpoints, and/or reject oversized requests before JSON parsing.
CVE-2026-53977 1 Bohdan Triapitsyn 1 Openchamber 2026-08-07 7.5 High
OpenChamber 1.11.7 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to terminate the server process by sending a POST request to the /api/system/shutdown endpoint, which is registered before the authentication middleware in the Express route handler chain. Attackers can exploit the route registration order in bootstrap-runtime.js to reach the shutdown handler before auth middleware executes, causing denial of service to all active AI coding sessions and locking out legitimate remote users regardless of whether UI_PASSWORD is configured.
CVE-2026-18276 1 Scripta 1 Escriptorium 2026-08-07 4.3 Medium
Missing authorization in the websocket consumer in Scripta eScriptorium through 26.04.1 allows a remote authenticated user to subscribe to any document's event stream and observe another user's segmentation, transcription, import, export and training activity via the object_cls and object_pk values of a join-room message, which are passed to group_add without an access check
CVE-2026-18275 1 Scripta 1 Escriptorium 2026-08-07 6.5 Medium
Authorization bypass in the process and annotation taxonomy serializers in Scripta eScriptorium through 26.04.1 allows a remote authenticated user to run segmentation and transcription against other users' document parts, overwriting their content, via part primary keys supplied to a many=True related field whose queryset restriction was applied to the ManyRelatedField instead of its child_relation and therefore had no effect
CVE-2026-18359 1 Scripta 1 Escriptorium 2026-08-07 8.5 High
Server-side request forgery in the METS and IIIF import URI handling in Scripta eScriptorium through 26.04.1 allows a remote authenticated user to make the server issue arbitrary HTTP requests to internal hosts, including the cloud instance metadata service, via the mets_uri or iiif_uri parameter of POST /api/documents/{pk}/imports/, because the IMPORT_ALLOWED_DOMAINS setting defaults to '*' and no address filtering, redirect cap or timeout is applied
CVE-2026-18277 1 Scripta 1 Escriptorium 2026-08-07 7.1 High
Missing authorization in the OcrModelRight create and delete views in Scripta eScriptorium through 26.04.1 allows a remote authenticated user to grant themselves access to another user's private OCR model and to revoke any user's OCR model access via a POST request, because the ownership check is placed in get_context_data() and therefore runs only on the GET rendering path
CVE-2026-18258 1 Scripta 1 Escriptorium 2026-08-07 8.8 High
Authorization bypass in the Line, LineTranscription, VirtualCollection, tag and process API endpoints in Scripta/eScriptorium through 26.04.1 allows a remote authenticated user to read, modify and delete other users' transcription content via primary keys supplied in the request body, which are queried against the global model manager instead of the request-scoped queryset
CVE-2026-53985 1 Efstratios Goudelis 1 Ground Station 2026-08-07 7.5 High
Ground Station prior to 0.6.0 contains an unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability in the Socket.IO server's service_control event handler that allows any unauthenticated network peer to forcibly terminate the ground-station process by sending a single restart_service command. Attackers can connect to the Socket.IO server on port 7000 without credentials due to disabled authentication enforcement and a wildcard CORS policy, then emit the service_control event to terminate all active satellite-tracking sessions, SDR recording pipelines, demodulators, decoders, and rotator controllers, with repeated triggering possible in Docker deployments to create a persistent denial-of-service condition.
CVE-2026-48071 1 Open-reception 1 Appointment-booking-software 2026-08-07 5.8 Medium
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.4, the PIN-type challenge throttle uses `emailHash` as the only key. The throttle rows live in the central `challenge_throttle` table, which is shared across all tenants. Every tenant's `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/verify-challenge` endpoint increments the same row when a PIN response fails, and every tenant's `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/challenge` endpoint reads the same row when deciding whether to issue a new challenge. When the same `emailHash` exists in multiple tenants on the same OpenReception instance (the same patient holding tunnels in two different clinics that share the platform), an attacker who knows the patient's email can lock out that patient on tenant B by issuing failed challenge responses against tenant A. The attacker needs no relationship to tenant B; the lockout propagates through the shared throttle row. The lockout escalates with repeated failures. The first lockout triggers at 4 failed attempts and lasts approximately 60 seconds. Subsequent failures escalate the lockout duration to 5 minutes, 30 minutes, and 60 minutes per the throttle service's escalation logic. Repeated bursts produce sustained denial of service against the targeted email. Version 1.0.4 patches the issue.
CVE-2024-7885 1 Redhat 21 Apache Camel Hawtio, Apache Camel Spring Boot, Build Keycloak and 18 more 2026-08-07 7.5 High
A vulnerability was found in Undertow where the ProxyProtocolReadListener reuses the same StringBuilder instance across multiple requests. This issue occurs when the parseProxyProtocolV1 method processes multiple requests on the same HTTP connection. As a result, different requests may share the same StringBuilder instance, potentially leading to information leakage between requests or responses. In some cases, a value from a previous request or response may be erroneously reused, which could lead to unintended data exposure. This issue primarily results in errors and connection termination but creates a risk of data leakage in multi-request environments.