Filtered by vendor Pivotal Software
Subscriptions
Total
145 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-15762 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Operations Manager | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Pivotal Operations Manager, versions 2.0.x prior to 2.0.24, versions 2.1.x prior to 2.1.15, versions 2.2.x prior to 2.2.7, and versions 2.3.x prior to 2.3.1, grants all users a scope which allows for privilege escalation. A remote malicious user who has been authenticated may create a new client with administrator privileges for Opsman. | ||||
| CVE-2018-15761 | 1 Pivotal Software | 2 Cloud Foundry Uaa, Cloudfoundry Uaa Release | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Cloud Foundry UAA release, versions prior to v64.0, and UAA, versions prior to 4.23.0, contains a validation error which allows for privilege escalation. A remote authenticated user may modify the url and content of a consent page to gain a token with arbitrary scopes that escalates their privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2018-15759 | 1 Pivotal Software | 2 Broker Api, On Demand Services Sdk | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Pivotal Cloud Foundry On Demand Services SDK, versions prior to 0.24 contain an insecure method of verifying credentials. A remote unauthenticated malicious user may make many requests to the service broker with different credentials, allowing them to infer valid credentials and gain access to perform broker operations. | ||||
| CVE-2018-15758 | 2 Pivotal Software, Redhat | 2 Spring Security Oauth, Jboss Fuse | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Spring Security OAuth, versions 2.3 prior to 2.3.4, and 2.2 prior to 2.2.3, and 2.1 prior to 2.1.3, and 2.0 prior to 2.0.16, and older unsupported versions could be susceptible to a privilege escalation under certain conditions. A malicious user or attacker can craft a request to the approval endpoint that can modify the previously saved authorization request and lead to a privilege escalation on the subsequent approval. This scenario can happen if the application is configured to use a custom approval endpoint that declares AuthorizationRequest as a controller method argument. This vulnerability exposes applications that meet all of the following requirements: Act in the role of an Authorization Server (e.g. @EnableAuthorizationServer) and use a custom Approval Endpoint that declares AuthorizationRequest as a controller method argument. This vulnerability does not expose applications that: Act in the role of an Authorization Server and use the default Approval Endpoint, act in the role of a Resource Server only (e.g. @EnableResourceServer), act in the role of a Client only (e.g. @EnableOAuthClient). | ||||
| CVE-2018-15754 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Cloud Foundry Uaa-release | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Cloud Foundry UAA, versions 60 prior to 66.0, contain an authorization logic error. In environments with multiple identity providers that contain accounts across identity providers with the same username, a remote authenticated user with access to one of these accounts may be able to obtain a token for an account of the same username in the other identity provider. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11088 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Pivotal Application Service | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Pivotal Applications Manager in Pivotal Application Service, versions 2.0 prior to 2.0.21 and 2.1 prior to 2.1.13 and 2.2 prior to 2.2.5, contains a bug which may allow escalation of privileges. A space developer with access to the system org may be able to access an artifact which contains the CF admin credential, allowing them to escalate to an admin role. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11087 | 1 Pivotal Software | 2 Rabbitmq, Spring Advanced Message Queuing Protocol | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Pivotal Spring AMQP, 1.x versions prior to 1.7.10 and 2.x versions prior to 2.0.6, expose a man-in-the-middle vulnerability due to lack of hostname validation. A malicious user that has the ability to intercept traffic would be able to view data in transit. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11086 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Pivotal Application Service | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Pivotal Usage Service in Pivotal Application Service, versions 2.0 prior to 2.0.21 and 2.1 prior to 2.1.13 and 2.2 prior to 2.2.5, contains a bug which may allow escalation of privileges. A space developer with access to the system org may be able to access an artifact which contains the CF admin credential, allowing them to escalate to an admin role. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11082 | 1 Pivotal Software | 2 Cloudfoundry Uaa, Cloudfoundry Uaa Release | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Cloud Foundry UAA, all versions prior to 4.20.0 and Cloud Foundry UAA Release, all versions prior to 61.0, allows brute forcing of MFA codes. A remote unauthenticated malicious user in possession of a valid username and password can brute force MFA to login as the targeted user. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11081 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Operations Manager | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Pivotal Operations Manager, versions 2.2.x prior to 2.2.1, 2.1.x prior to 2.1.11, 2.0.x prior to 2.0.16, and 1.11.x prior to 2, fails to write the Operations Manager UAA config onto the temp RAM disk, thus exposing the configs directly onto disk. A remote user that has gained access to the Operations Manager VM, can now file search and find the UAA credentials for Operations Manager on the system disk.. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11047 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Cloud Foundry UAA, versions 4.19 prior to 4.19.2 and 4.12 prior to 4.12.4 and 4.10 prior to 4.10.2 and 4.7 prior to 4.7.6 and 4.5 prior to 4.5.7, incorrectly authorizes requests to admin endpoints by accepting a valid refresh token in lieu of an access token. Refresh tokens by design have a longer expiration time than access tokens, allowing the possessor of a refresh token to authenticate longer than expected. This affects the administrative endpoints of the UAA. i.e. /Users, /Groups, etc. However, if the user has been deleted or had groups removed, or the client was deleted, the refresh token will no longer be valid. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11046 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Operations Manager | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Pivotal Operations Manager, versions 2.1.x prior to 2.1.6 and version 2.0.14, includes NGINX packages that lacks security vulnerability patches. An attacker with access to the NGINX processes and knowledge of how to exploit the unpatched vulnerabilities may be able to impact Operations Manager | ||||
| CVE-2018-11045 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Operations Manager | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Pivotal Operations Manager, versions 2.1 prior to 2.1.6 and 2.0 prior to 2.0.15 and 1.12 prior to 1.12.22, contains a static Linux Random Number Generator (LRNG) seed file embedded in the appliance image. An attacker with knowledge of the exact version and IaaS of a running OpsManager could get the contents of the corresponding seed from the published image and therefore infer the initial state of the LRNG. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11044 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Pivotal Application Service | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Pivotal Apps Manager included in Pivotal Application Service, versions 2.2.x prior to 2.2.1 and 2.1.x prior to 2.1.8 and 2.0.x prior to 2.0.17 and 1.12.x prior to 1.12.26, does not escape all user-provided content when sending invitation emails. A malicious authenticated user can inject content into an invite to another user, exploiting the trust implied by the source of the email. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11041 | 1 Pivotal Software | 2 Cloud Foundry Uaa, Cloud Foundry Uaa-release | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Cloud Foundry UAA, versions later than 4.6.0 and prior to 4.19.0 except 4.10.1 and 4.7.5 and uaa-release versions later than v48 and prior to v60 except v55.1 and v52.9, does not validate redirect URL values on a form parameter used for internal UAA redirects on the login page, allowing open redirects. A remote attacker can craft a malicious link that, when clicked, will redirect users to arbitrary websites after a successful login attempt. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8046 | 3 Pivotal Software, Redhat, Vmware | 3 Spring Data Rest, Jboss Fuse, Spring Boot | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Malicious PATCH requests submitted to servers using Spring Data REST versions prior to 2.6.9 (Ingalls SR9), versions prior to 3.0.1 (Kay SR1) and Spring Boot versions prior to 1.5.9, 2.0 M6 can use specially crafted JSON data to run arbitrary Java code. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8045 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Spring Advanced Message Queuing Protocol | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Pivotal Spring AMQP versions prior to 1.7.4, 1.6.11, and 1.5.7, an org.springframework.amqp.core.Message may be unsafely deserialized when being converted into a string. A malicious payload could be crafted to exploit this and enable a remote code execution attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8038 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Credhub-release | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Cloud Foundry Foundation Credhub-release version 1.1.0, access control lists (ACLs) enforce whether an authenticated user can perform an operation on a credential. For installations using ACLs, the ACL was bypassed for the CredHub interpolate endpoint, allowing authenticated applications to view any credential within the CredHub installation. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8032 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 3 Cloud Foundry Uaa Bosh, Cloud Foundry Cf, Cloud Foundry Uaa | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Cloud Foundry cf-release versions prior to v264; UAA release all versions of UAA v2.x.x, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.13, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.15, 3.20.x versions prior to v3.20.0, and other versions prior to v4.4.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.17, 24.x versions prior to v24.12. 30.x versions prior to 30.5, and other versions prior to v41, zone administrators are allowed to escalate their privileges when mapping permissions for an external provider. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8028 | 3 Debian, Pivotal Software, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Spring-ldap, Jboss Amq and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Pivotal Spring-LDAP versions 1.3.0 - 2.3.1, when connected to some LDAP servers, when no additional attributes are bound, and when using LDAP BindAuthenticator with org.springframework.ldap.core.support.DefaultTlsDirContextAuthenticationStrategy as the authentication strategy, and setting userSearch, authentication is allowed with an arbitrary password when the username is correct. This occurs because some LDAP vendors require an explicit operation for the LDAP bind to take effect. | ||||