Filtered by vendor Pivotal Software
Subscriptions
Total
145 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-11287 | 5 Broadcom, Debian, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 5 Rabbitmq Server, Debian Linux, Fedora and 2 more | 2025-04-02 | 7.5 High |
| Pivotal RabbitMQ, versions 3.7.x prior to 3.7.21 and 3.8.x prior to 3.8.1, and RabbitMQ for Pivotal Platform, 1.16.x versions prior to 1.16.7 and 1.17.x versions prior to 1.17.4, contain a web management plugin that is vulnerable to a denial of service attack. The "X-Reason" HTTP Header can be leveraged to insert a malicious Erlang format string that will expand and consume the heap, resulting in the server crashing. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4965 | 3 Broadcom, Debian, Pivotal Software | 3 Rabbitmq Server, Debian Linux, Rabbitmq | 2025-04-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. Several forms in the RabbitMQ management UI are vulnerable to XSS attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2020-5419 | 2 Broadcom, Pivotal Software | 2 Rabbitmq Server, Rabbitmq | 2025-04-02 | 6.7 Medium |
| RabbitMQ versions 3.8.x prior to 3.8.7 are prone to a Windows-specific binary planting security vulnerability that allows for arbitrary code execution. An attacker with write privileges to the RabbitMQ installation directory and local access on Windows could carry out a local binary hijacking (planting) attack and execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9877 | 2 Broadcom, Pivotal Software | 2 Rabbitmq Server, Rabbitmq | 2025-04-02 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Pivotal RabbitMQ 3.x before 3.5.8 and 3.6.x before 3.6.6 and RabbitMQ for PCF 1.5.x before 1.5.20, 1.6.x before 1.6.12, and 1.7.x before 1.7.7. MQTT (MQ Telemetry Transport) connection authentication with a username/password pair succeeds if an existing username is provided but the password is omitted from the connection request. Connections that use TLS with a client-provided certificate are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4967 | 3 Broadcom, Debian, Pivotal Software | 3 Rabbitmq Server, Debian Linux, Rabbitmq | 2025-04-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. Several forms in the RabbitMQ management UI are vulnerable to XSS attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-4966 | 3 Broadcom, Debian, Pivotal Software | 3 Rabbitmq Server, Debian Linux, Rabbitmq | 2025-04-02 | 7.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in these Pivotal RabbitMQ versions: all 3.4.x versions, all 3.5.x versions, and 3.6.x versions prior to 3.6.9; and these RabbitMQ for PCF versions: all 1.5.x versions, 1.6.x versions prior to 1.6.18, and 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.15. RabbitMQ management UI stores signed-in user credentials in a browser's local storage without expiration, making it possible to retrieve them using a chained attack. | ||||
| CVE-2018-11087 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Spring Advanced Message Queuing Protocol, Rabbitmq Java Client | 2025-03-27 | 5.9 Medium |
| Pivotal Spring AMQP, 1.x versions prior to 1.7.10 and 2.x versions prior to 2.0.6, expose a man-in-the-middle vulnerability due to lack of hostname validation. A malicious user that has the ability to intercept traffic would be able to view data in transit. | ||||
| CVE-2018-1273 | 3 Apache, Oracle, Pivotal Software | 4 Ignite, Financial Services Crime And Compliance Management Studio, Spring Data Commons and 1 more | 2025-03-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| Spring Data Commons, versions prior to 1.13 to 1.13.10, 2.0 to 2.0.5, and older unsupported versions, contain a property binder vulnerability caused by improper neutralization of special elements. An unauthenticated remote malicious user (or attacker) can supply specially crafted request parameters against Spring Data REST backed HTTP resources or using Spring Data's projection-based request payload binding hat can lead to a remote code execution attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22257 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Spring Security | 2025-02-13 | 8.2 High |
| In Spring Security, versions 5.7.x prior to 5.7.12, 5.8.x prior to 5.8.11, versions 6.0.x prior to 6.0.9, versions 6.1.x prior to 6.1.8, versions 6.2.x prior to 6.2.3, an application is possible vulnerable to broken access control when it directly uses the AuthenticatedVoter#vote passing a null Authentication parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2022-31683 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Concourse | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| Concourse (7.x.y prior to 7.8.3 and 6.x.y prior to 6.7.9) contains an authorization bypass issue. A Concourse user can send a request with body including :team_name=team2 to bypass team scope check to gain access to certain resources belong to any other team. | ||||
| CVE-2021-22112 | 3 Oracle, Pivotal Software, Vmware | 8 Communications Element Manager, Communications Interactive Session Recorder, Communications Unified Inventory Management and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Spring Security 5.4.x prior to 5.4.4, 5.3.x prior to 5.3.8.RELEASE, 5.2.x prior to 5.2.9.RELEASE, and older unsupported versions can fail to save the SecurityContext if it is changed more than once in a single request.A malicious user cannot cause the bug to happen (it must be programmed in). However, if the application's intent is to only allow the user to run with elevated privileges in a small portion of the application, the bug can be leveraged to extend those privileges to the rest of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2020-5415 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Concourse | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 Critical |
| Concourse, versions prior to 6.3.1 and 6.4.1, in installations which use the GitLab auth connector, is vulnerable to identity spoofing by way of configuring a GitLab account with the same full name as another user who is granted access to a Concourse team. GitLab groups do not have this vulnerability, so GitLab users may be moved into groups which are then configured in the Concourse team. | ||||
| CVE-2020-5411 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Spring Batch | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| When configured to enable default typing, Jackson contained a deserialization vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary code execution. Jackson fixed this vulnerability by blacklisting known "deserialization gadgets". Spring Batch configures Jackson with global default typing enabled which means that through the previous exploit, arbitrary code could be executed if all of the following is true: * Spring Batch's Jackson support is being leveraged to serialize a job's ExecutionContext. * A malicious user gains write access to the data store used by the JobRepository (where the data to be deserialized is stored). In order to protect against this type of attack, Jackson prevents a set of untrusted gadget classes from being deserialized. Spring Batch should be proactive against blocking unknown "deserialization gadgets" when enabling default typing. | ||||
| CVE-2020-5409 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Concourse | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| Pivotal Concourse, most versions prior to 6.0.0, allows redirects to untrusted websites in its login flow. A remote unauthenticated attacker could convince a user to click on a link using the OAuth redirect link with an untrusted website and gain access to that user's access token in Concourse. (This issue is similar to, but distinct from, CVE-2018-15798.) | ||||
| CVE-2020-5408 | 2 Pivotal Software, Vmware | 2 Spring Security, Spring Security | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Spring Security versions 5.3.x prior to 5.3.2, 5.2.x prior to 5.2.4, 5.1.x prior to 5.1.10, 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16 and 4.2.x prior to 4.2.16 use a fixed null initialization vector with CBC Mode in the implementation of the queryable text encryptor. A malicious user with access to the data that has been encrypted using such an encryptor may be able to derive the unencrypted values using a dictionary attack. | ||||
| CVE-2020-5407 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Spring Security | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Spring Security versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.4 and 5.3.x prior to 5.3.2 contain a signature wrapping vulnerability during SAML response validation. When using the spring-security-saml2-service-provider component, a malicious user can carefully modify an otherwise valid SAML response and append an arbitrary assertion that Spring Security will accept as valid. | ||||
| CVE-2020-5399 | 2 Cloudfoundry, Pivotal Software | 2 Credhub, Cloud Foundry Cf-deployment | 2024-11-21 | 7.4 High |
| Cloud Foundry CredHub, versions prior to 2.5.10, connects to a MySQL database without TLS even when configured to use TLS. A malicious user with access to the network between CredHub and its MySQL database may eavesdrop on database connections and thereby gain unauthorized access to CredHub and other components. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3803 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Concourse | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Pivotal Concourse, all versions prior to 4.2.2, puts the user access token in a url during the login flow. A remote attacker who gains access to a user's browser history could obtain the access token and use it to authenticate as the user. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3802 | 2 Pivotal Software, Redhat | 2 Spring Data Java Persistance Api, Jboss Fuse | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| This affects Spring Data JPA in versions up to and including 2.1.6, 2.0.14 and 1.11.20. ExampleMatcher using ExampleMatcher.StringMatcher.STARTING, ExampleMatcher.StringMatcher.ENDING or ExampleMatcher.StringMatcher.CONTAINING could return more results than anticipated when a maliciously crafted example value is supplied. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3797 | 2 Pivotal Software, Redhat | 2 Spring Data Java Persistence Api, Jboss Fuse | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| This affects Spring Data JPA in versions up to and including 2.1.5, 2.0.13 and 1.11.19. Derived queries using any of the predicates ‘startingWith’, ‘endingWith’ or ‘containing’ could return more results than anticipated when a maliciously crafted query parameter value is supplied. Also, LIKE expressions in manually defined queries could return unexpected results if the parameter values bound did not have escaped reserved characters properly. | ||||