Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Openshift
Subscriptions
Total
931 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-0235 | 4 Debian, Node-fetch Project, Redhat and 1 more | 14 Debian Linux, Node-fetch, Acm and 11 more | 2024-08-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| node-fetch is vulnerable to Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor | ||||
| CVE-2023-49568 | 2 Go-git Project, Redhat | 10 Go-git, Acm, Advanced Cluster Security and 7 more | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was discovered in go-git versions prior to v5.11. This vulnerability allows an attacker to perform denial of service attacks by providing specially crafted responses from a Git server which triggers resource exhaustion in go-git clients. Applications using only the in-memory filesystem supported by go-git are not affected by this vulnerability. This is a go-git implementation issue and does not affect the upstream git cli. | ||||
| CVE-2023-49569 | 2 Go-git Project, Redhat | 10 Go-git, Acm, Advanced Cluster Security and 7 more | 2024-08-02 | 9.8 Critical |
| A path traversal vulnerability was discovered in go-git versions prior to v5.11. This vulnerability allows an attacker to create and amend files across the filesystem. In the worse case scenario, remote code execution could be achieved. Applications are only affected if they are using the ChrootOS https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5/osfs#ChrootOS , which is the default when using "Plain" versions of Open and Clone funcs (e.g. PlainClone). Applications using BoundOS https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/go-git/go-billy/v5/osfs#BoundOS or in-memory filesystems are not affected by this issue. This is a go-git implementation issue and does not affect the upstream git cli. | ||||
| CVE-2023-48795 | 43 9bis, Apache, Apple and 40 more | 78 Kitty, Sshd, Sshj and 75 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.10.6, libssh2 through 1.11.0, Thorn Tech SFTP Gateway before 3.4.6, Tera Term before 5.1, Paramiko before 3.4.0, jsch before 0.2.15, SFTPGo before 2.5.6, Netgate pfSense Plus through 23.09.1, Netgate pfSense CE through 2.7.2, HPN-SSH through 18.2.0, ProFTPD before 1.3.8b (and before 1.3.9rc2), ORYX CycloneSSH before 2.3.4, NetSarang XShell 7 before Build 0144, CrushFTP before 10.6.0, ConnectBot SSH library before 2.2.22, Apache MINA sshd through 2.11.0, sshj through 0.37.0, TinySSH through 20230101, trilead-ssh2 6401, LANCOM LCOS and LANconfig, FileZilla before 3.66.4, Nova before 11.8, PKIX-SSH before 14.4, SecureCRT before 9.4.3, Transmit5 before 5.10.4, Win32-OpenSSH before 9.5.0.0p1-Beta, WinSCP before 6.2.2, Bitvise SSH Server before 9.32, Bitvise SSH Client before 9.33, KiTTY through 0.76.1.13, the net-ssh gem 7.2.0 for Ruby, the mscdex ssh2 module before 1.15.0 for Node.js, the thrussh library before 0.35.1 for Rust, and the Russh crate before 0.40.2 for Rust. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45539 | 2 Haproxy, Redhat | 4 Haproxy, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 1 more | 2024-08-02 | 8.2 High |
| HAProxy before 2.8.2 accepts # as part of the URI component, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or have unspecified other impact upon misinterpretation of a path_end rule, such as routing index.html#.png to a static server. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45285 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 4 Go, Devtools, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| Using go get to fetch a module with the ".git" suffix may unexpectedly fallback to the insecure "git://" protocol if the module is unavailable via the secure "https://" and "git+ssh://" protocols, even if GOINSECURE is not set for said module. This only affects users who are not using the module proxy and are fetching modules directly (i.e. GOPROXY=off). | ||||
| CVE-2023-45289 | 1 Redhat | 10 Advanced Cluster Security, Enterprise Linux, Logging and 7 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| When following an HTTP redirect to a domain which is not a subdomain match or exact match of the initial domain, an http.Client does not forward sensitive headers such as "Authorization" or "Cookie". For example, a redirect from foo.com to www.foo.com will forward the Authorization header, but a redirect to bar.com will not. A maliciously crafted HTTP redirect could cause sensitive headers to be unexpectedly forwarded. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45290 | 1 Redhat | 18 Advanced Cluster Security, Ansible Automation Platform, Cryostat and 15 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| When parsing a multipart form (either explicitly with Request.ParseMultipartForm or implicitly with Request.FormValue, Request.PostFormValue, or Request.FormFile), limits on the total size of the parsed form were not applied to the memory consumed while reading a single form line. This permits a maliciously crafted input containing very long lines to cause allocation of arbitrarily large amounts of memory, potentially leading to memory exhaustion. With fix, the ParseMultipartForm function now correctly limits the maximum size of form lines. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45287 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 11 Go, Enterprise Linux, Migration Toolkit Applications and 8 more | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| Before Go 1.20, the RSA based TLS key exchanges used the math/big library, which is not constant time. RSA blinding was applied to prevent timing attacks, but analysis shows this may not have been fully effective. In particular it appears as if the removal of PKCS#1 padding may leak timing information, which in turn could be used to recover session key bits. In Go 1.20, the crypto/tls library switched to a fully constant time RSA implementation, which we do not believe exhibits any timing side channels. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45142 | 2 Opentelemetry, Redhat | 7 Opentelemetry, Acm, Ceph Storage and 4 more | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| OpenTelemetry-Go Contrib is a collection of third-party packages for OpenTelemetry-Go. A handler wrapper out of the box adds labels `http.user_agent` and `http.method` that have unbound cardinality. It leads to the server's potential memory exhaustion when many malicious requests are sent to it. HTTP header User-Agent or HTTP method for requests can be easily set by an attacker to be random and long. The library internally uses `httpconv.ServerRequest` that records every value for HTTP `method` and `User-Agent`. In order to be affected, a program has to use the `otelhttp.NewHandler` wrapper and not filter any unknown HTTP methods or User agents on the level of CDN, LB, previous middleware, etc. Version 0.44.0 fixed this issue when the values collected for attribute `http.request.method` were changed to be restricted to a set of well-known values and other high cardinality attributes were removed. As a workaround to stop being affected, `otelhttp.WithFilter()` can be used, but it requires manual careful configuration to not log certain requests entirely. For convenience and safe usage of this library, it should by default mark with the label `unknown` non-standard HTTP methods and User agents to show that such requests were made but do not increase cardinality. In case someone wants to stay with the current behavior, library API should allow to enable it. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28849 | 1 Redhat | 9 Advanced Cluster Security, Ansible Automation Platform, Logging and 6 more | 2024-08-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| follow-redirects is an open source, drop-in replacement for Node's `http` and `https` modules that automatically follows redirects. In affected versions follow-redirects only clears authorization header during cross-domain redirect, but keep the proxy-authentication header which contains credentials too. This vulnerability may lead to credentials leak, but has been addressed in version 1.15.6. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39615 | 2 Redhat, Xmlsoft | 6 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services, Openshift and 3 more | 2024-08-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Xmlsoft Libxml2 v2.11.0 was discovered to contain an out-of-bounds read via the xmlSAX2StartElement() function at /libxml2/SAX2.c. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via supplying a crafted XML file. NOTE: the vendor's position is that the product does not support the legacy SAX1 interface with custom callbacks; there is a crash even without crafted input. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40577 | 3 Debian, Prometheus, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Alertmanager, Openshift | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| Alertmanager handles alerts sent by client applications such as the Prometheus server. An attacker with the permission to perform POST requests on the /api/v1/alerts endpoint could be able to execute arbitrary JavaScript code on the users of Prometheus Alertmanager. This issue has been fixed in Alertmanager version 0.2.51. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40370 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 4 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Windows and 1 more | 2024-08-02 | 3.7 Low |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.1 runtime is vulnerable to information disclosure of script content if the remote REST request computer policy is enabled. IBM X-Force ID: 263470. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40225 | 2 Haproxy, Redhat | 4 Haproxy, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 1 more | 2024-08-02 | 7.2 High |
| HAProxy through 2.0.32, 2.1.x and 2.2.x through 2.2.30, 2.3.x and 2.4.x through 2.4.23, 2.5.x and 2.6.x before 2.6.15, 2.7.x before 2.7.10, and 2.8.x before 2.8.2 forwards empty Content-Length headers, violating RFC 9110 section 8.6. In uncommon cases, an HTTP/1 server behind HAProxy may interpret the payload as an extra request. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39322 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 17 Go, Acm, Ansible Automation Platform and 14 more | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| QUIC connections do not set an upper bound on the amount of data buffered when reading post-handshake messages, allowing a malicious QUIC connection to cause unbounded memory growth. With fix, connections now consistently reject messages larger than 65KiB in size. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39318 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 15 Go, Acm, Enterprise Linux and 12 more | 2024-08-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| The html/template package does not properly handle HTML-like "" comment tokens, nor hashbang "#!" comment tokens, in <script> contexts. This may cause the template parser to improperly interpret the contents of <script> contexts, causing actions to be improperly escaped. This may be leveraged to perform an XSS attack. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39321 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 17 Go, Acm, Ansible Automation Platform and 14 more | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| Processing an incomplete post-handshake message for a QUIC connection can cause a panic. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39326 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 20 Go, Ansible Automation Platform, Cryostat and 17 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| A malicious HTTP sender can use chunk extensions to cause a receiver reading from a request or response body to read many more bytes from the network than are in the body. A malicious HTTP client can further exploit this to cause a server to automatically read a large amount of data (up to about 1GiB) when a handler fails to read the entire body of a request. Chunk extensions are a little-used HTTP feature which permit including additional metadata in a request or response body sent using the chunked encoding. The net/http chunked encoding reader discards this metadata. A sender can exploit this by inserting a large metadata segment with each byte transferred. The chunk reader now produces an error if the ratio of real body to encoded bytes grows too small. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39319 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 15 Go, Acm, Enterprise Linux and 12 more | 2024-08-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| The html/template package does not apply the proper rules for handling occurrences of "<script", "<!--", and "</script" within JS literals in <script> contexts. This may cause the template parser to improperly consider script contexts to be terminated early, causing actions to be improperly escaped. This could be leveraged to perform an XSS attack. | ||||