| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Out-of-bounds read in applying binary with path in Samsung Notes prior to version 4.4.21.62 allows local attackers to potentially read memory. |
| Out-of-bounds read in parsing implemention in Samsung Notes prior to version 4.4.21.62 allows local attackers to potentially read memory. |
| Out-of-bounds read in applying own binary in Samsung Notes prior to version 4.4.21.62 allows local attackers to potentially read memory. |
| Out-of-bounds read in applying connection point in Samsung Notes prior to version 4.4.21.62 allows local attackers to potentially read memory. |
| Out-of-bounds read in applying new binary in Samsung Notes prior to version 4.4.21.62 allows local attackers to potentially read memory. |
| Out-of-bounds read in applying binary with data in Samsung Notes prior to version 4.4.21.62 allows local attackers to potentially read memory. |
| Out-of-bounds read in applying paragraphs in Samsung Notes prior to version 4.4.21.62 allows local attackers to potentially read memory. |
| biscuit-java is the java implementation of Biscuit, an authentication and authorization token for microservices architectures. Third-party blocks can be generated without transferring the whole token to the third-party authority. Instead, a ThirdPartyBlock request can be sent, providing only the necessary info to generate a third-party block and to sign it, which includes the public key of the previous block (used in the signature) and the public keys part of the token symbol table (for public key interning in datalog expressions). A third-part block request forged by a malicious user can trick the third-party authority into generating datalog trusting the wrong keypair. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.0.0. |
| Dell iDRAC Service Module version 5.3.0.0 and prior, contain a Out of bound Read Vulnerability. A privileged local attacker could execute arbitrary code potentially resulting in a denial of service event. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| Duplicate of CVE-2024-5629. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| CVE-2023-39195 was found to be a duplicate of CVE-2023-42755. Please see https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-42755 for more information. |
| This was deemed not a security vulnerability by upstream. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it only affected a development version. Notes: none |
