Filtered by vendor Openssl
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Openssl
Subscriptions
Total
257 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2016-6308 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
statem/statem_dtls.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allocates memory before checking for an excessive length, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via crafted DTLS messages. | ||||
CVE-2016-6307 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The state-machine implementation in OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allocates memory before checking for an excessive length, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via crafted TLS messages, related to statem/statem.c and statem/statem_lib.c. | ||||
CVE-2016-6306 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Hp and 4 more | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Icewall Federation Agent and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
The certificate parser in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via crafted certificate operations, related to s3_clnt.c and s3_srvr.c. | ||||
CVE-2016-6305 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The ssl3_read_bytes function in record/rec_layer_s3.c in OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) by triggering a zero-length record in an SSL_peek call. | ||||
CVE-2016-6304 | 4 Nodejs, Novell, Openssl and 1 more | 11 Node.js, Suse Linux Enterprise Module For Web Scripting, Openssl and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
Multiple memory leaks in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u, 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i, and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via large OCSP Status Request extensions. | ||||
CVE-2016-6303 | 2 Nodejs, Openssl | 2 Node.js, Openssl | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
Integer overflow in the MDC2_Update function in crypto/mdc2/mdc2dgst.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors. | ||||
CVE-2016-6302 | 3 Openssl, Oracle, Redhat | 5 Openssl, Linux, Solaris and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not consider the HMAC size during validation of the ticket length, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a ticket that is too short. | ||||
CVE-2016-2842 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The doapr_outch function in crypto/bio/b_print.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g does not verify that a certain memory allocation succeeds, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write or memory consumption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long string, as demonstrated by a large amount of ASN.1 data, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0799. | ||||
CVE-2016-2183 | 6 Cisco, Nodejs, Openssl and 3 more | 14 Content Security Management Appliance, Node.js, Openssl and 11 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack. | ||||
CVE-2016-2182 | 4 Hp, Openssl, Oracle and 1 more | 8 Icewall Federation Agent, Icewall Mcrp, Icewall Sso and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The BN_bn2dec function in crypto/bn/bn_print.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not properly validate division results, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors. | ||||
CVE-2016-2181 | 3 Openssl, Oracle, Redhat | 3 Openssl, Linux, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 mishandles early use of a new epoch number in conjunction with a large sequence number, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (false-positive packet drops) via spoofed DTLS records, related to rec_layer_d1.c and ssl3_record.c. | ||||
CVE-2016-2180 | 3 Openssl, Oracle, Redhat | 3 Openssl, Linux, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The TS_OBJ_print_bio function in crypto/ts/ts_lib.c in the X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP) implementation in OpenSSL through 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a crafted time-stamp file that is mishandled by the "openssl ts" command. | ||||
CVE-2016-2179 | 3 Openssl, Oracle, Redhat | 3 Openssl, Linux, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not properly restrict the lifetime of queue entries associated with unused out-of-order messages, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by maintaining many crafted DTLS sessions simultaneously, related to d1_lib.c, statem_dtls.c, statem_lib.c, and statem_srvr.c. | ||||
CVE-2016-2178 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Nodejs and 4 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Node.js and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
The dsa_sign_setup function in crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c in OpenSSL through 1.0.2h does not properly ensure the use of constant-time operations, which makes it easier for local users to discover a DSA private key via a timing side-channel attack. | ||||
CVE-2016-2177 | 4 Hp, Openssl, Oracle and 1 more | 9 Icewall Mcrp, Icewall Sso, Icewall Sso Agent Option and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
OpenSSL through 1.0.2h incorrectly uses pointer arithmetic for heap-buffer boundary checks, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging unexpected malloc behavior, related to s3_srvr.c, ssl_sess.c, and t1_lib.c. | ||||
CVE-2016-2176 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The X509_NAME_oneline function in crypto/x509/x509_obj.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process stack memory or cause a denial of service (buffer over-read) via crafted EBCDIC ASN.1 data. | ||||
CVE-2016-2109 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 12 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The asn1_d2i_read_bio function in crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c in the ASN.1 BIO implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a short invalid encoding. | ||||
CVE-2016-2108 | 3 Google, Openssl, Redhat | 13 Android, Openssl, Enterprise Linux and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The ASN.1 implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1o and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2c allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer underflow and memory corruption) via an ANY field in crafted serialized data, aka the "negative zero" issue. | ||||
CVE-2016-2107 | 8 Canonical, Debian, Google and 5 more | 18 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Android and 15 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169. | ||||
CVE-2016-2106 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 13 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
Integer overflow in the EVP_EncryptUpdate function in crypto/evp/evp_enc.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a large amount of data. |