Filtered by vendor Mutt
Subscriptions
Total
46 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-49395 | 3 Mutt, Neomutt, Redhat | 3 Mutt, Neomutt, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-15 | 5.3 Medium |
In mutt and neomutt, PGP encryption does not use the --hidden-recipient mode which may leak the Bcc email header field by inferring from the recipients info. | ||||
CVE-2024-49394 | 3 Mutt, Neomutt, Redhat | 3 Mutt, Neomutt, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-15 | 5.3 Medium |
In mutt and neomutt the In-Reply-To email header field is not protected by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker to reuse an unencrypted but signed email message to impersonate the original sender. | ||||
CVE-2024-49393 | 3 Mutt, Neomutt, Redhat | 3 Mutt, Neomutt, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-15 | 7.4 High |
In neomutt and mutt, the To and Cc email headers are not validated by cryptographic signing which allows an attacker that intercepts a message to change their value and include himself as a one of the recipients to compromise message confidentiality. | ||||
CVE-2009-3765 | 2 Mutt, Openssl | 2 Mutt, Openssl | 2024-09-16 | N/A |
mutt_ssl.c in mutt 1.5.19 and 1.5.20, when OpenSSL is used, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408. | ||||
CVE-2023-4874 | 3 Debian, Mutt, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Mutt, Enterprise Linux | 2024-08-30 | 4.3 Medium |
Null pointer dereference when viewing a specially crafted email in Mutt >1.5.2 <2.2.12 | ||||
CVE-2023-4875 | 3 Debian, Mutt, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Mutt, Enterprise Linux | 2024-08-30 | 2.2 Low |
Null pointer dereference when composing from a specially crafted draft message in Mutt >1.5.2 <2.2.12 | ||||
CVE-2001-0473 | 5 Conectiva, Immunix, Mandrakesoft and 2 more | 5 Linux, Immunix, Mandrake Linux and 2 more | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Format string vulnerability in Mutt before 1.2.5 allows a remote malicious IMAP server to execute arbitrary commands. | ||||
CVE-2002-0001 | 2 Mutt, Redhat | 2 Mutt, Linux | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Vulnerability in RFC822 address parser in mutt before 1.2.5.1 and mutt 1.3.x before 1.3.25 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via an improperly terminated comment or phrase in the address list. | ||||
CVE-2003-0299 | 2 Mutt, Stuart Parmenter | 2 Mutt, Balsa | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
The IMAP Client, as used in mutt 1.4.1 and Balsa 2.0.10, allows remote malicious IMAP servers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via certain large mailbox size values that cause either integer signedness errors or integer overflow errors. | ||||
CVE-2003-0300 | 8 Microsoft, Mozilla, Mutt and 5 more | 8 Outlook Express, Mozilla, Mutt and 5 more | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
The IMAP Client for Sylpheed 0.8.11 allows remote malicious IMAP servers to cause a denial of service (crash) via certain large literal size values that cause either integer signedness errors or integer overflow errors. | ||||
CVE-2003-0167 | 1 Mutt | 1 Mutt | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Multiple off-by-one buffer overflows in the IMAP capability for Mutt 1.3.28 and earlier, and Balsa 1.2.4 and earlier, allow a remote malicious IMAP server to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a specially crafted mail folder, a different vulnerability than CVE-2003-0140. | ||||
CVE-2003-0140 | 2 Mutt, Redhat | 3 Mutt, Enterprise Linux, Linux | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Buffer overflow in Mutt 1.4.0 and possibly earlier versions, 1.5.x up to 1.5.3, and other programs that use Mutt code such as Balsa before 2.0.10, allows a remote malicious IMAP server to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted folder. | ||||
CVE-2004-0078 | 2 Mutt, Redhat | 3 Mutt, Enterprise Linux, Linux | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Buffer overflow in the index menu code (menu_pad_string of menu.c) for Mutt 1.4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via certain mail messages. | ||||
CVE-2005-2642 | 1 Mutt | 1 Mutt | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
Buffer overflow in the mutt_decode_xbit function in Handler.c for Mutt 1.5.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, possibly due to interactions with libiconv or gettext. | ||||
CVE-2005-2351 | 2 Debian, Mutt | 2 Debian Linux, Mutt | 2024-08-07 | 5.5 Medium |
Mutt before 1.5.20 patch 7 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via a series of requests to mutt temporary files. | ||||
CVE-2006-5297 | 2 Mutt, Redhat | 2 Mutt, Enterprise Linux | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
Race condition in the safe_open function in the Mutt mail client 1.5.12 and earlier, when creating temporary files in an NFS filesystem, allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files due to limitations of the use of the O_EXCL flag on NFS filesystems. | ||||
CVE-2006-5298 | 1 Mutt | 1 Mutt | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
The mutt_adv_mktemp function in the Mutt mail client 1.5.12 and earlier does not properly verify that temporary files have been created with restricted permissions, which might allow local users to create files with weak permissions via a race condition between the mktemp and safe_fopen function calls. | ||||
CVE-2006-3242 | 2 Mutt, Redhat | 2 Mutt, Enterprise Linux | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
Stack-based buffer overflow in the browse_get_namespace function in imap/browse.c of Mutt 1.4.2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via long namespaces received from the IMAP server. | ||||
CVE-2007-2683 | 2 Mutt, Redhat | 2 Mutt, Enterprise Linux | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
Buffer overflow in Mutt 1.4.2 might allow local users to execute arbitrary code via "&" characters in the GECOS field, which triggers the overflow during alias expansion. | ||||
CVE-2007-1268 | 1 Mutt | 1 Mutt | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
Mutt 1.5.13 and earlier does not properly use the --status-fd argument when invoking GnuPG, which prevents Mutt from visually distinguishing between signed and unsigned portions of OpenPGP messages with multiple components, which allows remote attackers to forge the contents of a message without detection. |