Search Results (8629 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2023-42952 1 Apple 3 Ipad Os, Iphone Os, Macos 2025-11-04 4.4 Medium
The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 17.1 and iPadOS 17.1, macOS Ventura 13.6.3, macOS Sonoma 14.1, macOS Monterey 12.7.1. An app with root privileges may be able to access private information.
CVE-2025-59247 1 Microsoft 2 Azure, Azure Playfab 2025-11-04 8.8 High
Azure PlayFab Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2024-28085 2 Debian, Kernel 2 Debian Linux, Util-linux 2025-11-04 3.3 Low
wall in util-linux through 2.40, often installed with setgid tty permissions, allows escape sequences to be sent to other users' terminals through argv. (Specifically, escape sequences received from stdin are blocked, but escape sequences received from argv are not blocked.) There may be plausible scenarios where this leads to account takeover.
CVE-2024-23288 1 Apple 6 Ipad Os, Ipados, Iphone Os and 3 more 2025-11-04 8.4 High
This issue was addressed by removing the vulnerable code. This issue is fixed in tvOS 17.4, iOS 17.4 and iPadOS 17.4, macOS Sonoma 14.4, watchOS 10.4. An app may be able to elevate privileges.
CVE-2024-23276 1 Apple 1 Macos 2025-11-04 8.4 High
A logic issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.4, macOS Monterey 12.7.4, macOS Ventura 13.6.5. An app may be able to elevate privileges.
CVE-2024-23253 1 Apple 1 Macos 2025-11-04 7.5 High
A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.4. An app may be able to access a user's Photos Library.
CVE-2023-38944 1 Multilaser 4 Re160v, Re160v Firmware, Re163v and 1 more 2025-11-04 9.8 Critical
An issue in Multilaser RE160V firmware v12.03.01.09_pt and Multilaser RE163V firmware v12.03.01.10_pt allows attackers to bypass the access control and gain complete access to the application via modifying a HTTP header.
CVE-2024-40802 1 Apple 1 Macos 2025-11-04 7.8 High
The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.6, macOS Monterey 12.7.6, macOS Ventura 13.6.8. A local attacker may be able to elevate their privileges.
CVE-2024-40781 1 Apple 1 Macos 2025-11-04 8.4 High
The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.6, macOS Monterey 12.7.6, macOS Ventura 13.6.8. A local attacker may be able to elevate their privileges.
CVE-2024-27826 1 Apple 9 Ipad Os, Ipados, Iphone Os and 6 more 2025-11-04 7.8 High
The issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.6.8, macOS Sonoma 14.5, macOS Monterey 12.7.6, watchOS 10.5, visionOS 1.3, tvOS 17.5, iOS 17.5 and iPadOS 17.5. An app may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges.
CVE-2024-44147 1 Apple 3 Ios And Ipados, Ipados, Iphone Os 2025-11-04 7.7 High
This issue was addressed through improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 18 and iPadOS 18. An app may gain unauthorized access to Local Network.
CVE-2024-40861 1 Apple 1 Macos 2025-11-04 7.8 High
The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15. An app may be able to gain root privileges.
CVE-2023-32559 2 Nodejs, Redhat 4 Node.js, Nodejs, Enterprise Linux and 1 more 2025-11-04 7.5 High
A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 16.x, 18.x and, 20.x. The use of the deprecated API `process.binding()` can bypass the policy mechanism by requiring internal modules and eventually take advantage of `process.binding('spawn_sync')` run arbitrary code, outside of the limits defined in a `policy.json` file. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js.
CVE-2025-8900 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2025-11-04 9.8 Critical
The Doccure Core plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in versions up to, and excluding, 1.5.4. This is due to the plugin allowing users who are registering new accounts to set their own role or by supplying 'user_type' field. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to gain elevated privileges by creating an account with the administrator role.
CVE-2022-37705 1 Zmanda 1 Amanda 2025-11-04 6.7 Medium
A privilege escalation flaw was found in Amanda 3.5.1 in which the backup user can acquire root privileges. The vulnerable component is the runtar SUID program, which is a wrapper to run /usr/bin/tar with specific arguments that are controllable by the attacker. This program mishandles the arguments passed to tar binary (it expects that the argument name and value are separated with a space; however, separating them with an equals sign is also supported),
CVE-2022-37704 1 Zmanda 1 Amanda 2025-11-04 6.7 Medium
Amanda 3.5.1 allows privilege escalation from the regular user backup to root. The SUID binary located at /lib/amanda/rundump will execute /usr/sbin/dump as root with controlled arguments from the attacker which may lead to escalation of privileges, denial of service, and information disclosure.
CVE-2025-8489 2 Kingaddons, Wordpress 2 King Addons For Elementor, Wordpress 2025-11-04 9.8 Critical
The King Addons for Elementor – Free Elements, Widgets, Templates, and Features for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in versions 24.12.92 to 51.1.14 . This is due to the plugin not properly restricting the roles that users can register with. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to register with administrator-level user accounts.
CVE-2025-62645 2 Rbi, Restaurant Brands International 2 Restaurant Brands International Assistant, Assistant Platform 2025-11-04 9.9 Critical
The Restaurant Brands International (RBI) assistant platform through 2025-09-06 allows a remote authenticated attacker to obtain a token with administrative privileges for the entire platform via the createToken GraphQL mutation.
CVE-2025-24254 1 Apple 1 Macos 2025-11-03 8.8 High
This issue was addressed with improved validation of symlinks. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.7.5, macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5. A user may be able to elevate privileges.
CVE-2024-43882 2 Linux, Redhat 2 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux 2025-11-03 8.4 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exec: Fix ToCToU between perm check and set-uid/gid usage When opening a file for exec via do_filp_open(), permission checking is done against the file's metadata at that moment, and on success, a file pointer is passed back. Much later in the execve() code path, the file metadata (specifically mode, uid, and gid) is used to determine if/how to set the uid and gid. However, those values may have changed since the permissions check, meaning the execution may gain unintended privileges. For example, if a file could change permissions from executable and not set-id: ---------x 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target to set-id and non-executable: ---S------ 1 root root 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target it is possible to gain root privileges when execution should have been disallowed. While this race condition is rare in real-world scenarios, it has been observed (and proven exploitable) when package managers are updating the setuid bits of installed programs. Such files start with being world-executable but then are adjusted to be group-exec with a set-uid bit. For example, "chmod o-x,u+s target" makes "target" executable only by uid "root" and gid "cdrom", while also becoming setuid-root: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target becomes: -rwsr-xr-- 1 root cdrom 16048 Aug 7 13:16 target But racing the chmod means users without group "cdrom" membership can get the permission to execute "target" just before the chmod, and when the chmod finishes, the exec reaches brpm_fill_uid(), and performs the setuid to root, violating the expressed authorization of "only cdrom group members can setuid to root". Re-check that we still have execute permissions in case the metadata has changed. It would be better to keep a copy from the perm-check time, but until we can do that refactoring, the least-bad option is to do a full inode_permission() call (under inode lock). It is understood that this is safe against dead-locks, but hardly optimal.