Total
1088 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-24968 | 1 Mellium | 1 Xmpp | 2024-08-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| In Mellium mellium.im/xmpp through 0.21.0, an attacker capable of spoofing DNS TXT records can redirect a WebSocket connection request to a server under their control without causing TLS certificate verification to fail. This occurs because the wrong host name is selected during this verification. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24901 | 1 Parseplatform | 1 Parse-server | 2024-08-03 | 7.5 High |
| Improper validation of the Apple certificate URL in the Apple Game Center authentication adapter allows attackers to bypass authentication, making the server vulnerable to DoS attacks. The vulnerability has been fixed by improving the URL validation and adding additional checks of the resource the URL points to before downloading it. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24319 | 1 Schneider-electric | 3 Clearscada, Ecostruxure Geo Scada Expert 2019, Ecostruxure Geo Scada Expert 2020 | 2024-08-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| A CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability exists that could allow a Man-in-theMiddle attack when communications between the client and Geo SCADA web server are intercepted. Affected Product: ClearSCADA (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2019 (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2020 (All Versions) | ||||
| CVE-2022-24320 | 1 Schneider-electric | 3 Clearscada, Ecostruxure Geo Scada Expert 2019, Ecostruxure Geo Scada Expert 2020 | 2024-08-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| A CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability exists that could allow a Man-in-theMiddle attack when communications between the client and Geo SCADA database server are intercepted. Affected Product: ClearSCADA (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2019 (All Versions), EcoStruxure Geo SCADA Expert 2020 (All Versions) | ||||
| CVE-2022-23632 | 2 Oracle, Traefik | 2 Communications Unified Inventory Management, Traefik | 2024-08-03 | 7.4 High |
| Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to version 2.6.1, Traefik skips the router transport layer security (TLS) configuration when the host header is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). For a request, the TLS configuration choice can be different than the router choice, which implies the use of a wrong TLS configuration. When sending a request using FQDN handled by a router configured with a dedicated TLS configuration, the TLS configuration falls back to the default configuration that might not correspond to the configured one. If the CNAME flattening is enabled, the selected TLS configuration is the SNI one and the routing uses the CNAME value, so this can skip the expected TLS configuration. Version 2.6.1 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, one may add the FDQN to the host rule. However, there is no workaround if the CNAME flattening is enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23649 | 1 Sigstore | 1 Cosign | 2024-08-03 | 3.3 Low |
| Cosign provides container signing, verification, and storage in an OCI registry for the sigstore project. Prior to version 1.5.2, Cosign can be manipulated to claim that an entry for a signature exists in the Rekor transparency log even if it doesn't. This requires the attacker to have pull and push permissions for the signature in OCI. This can happen with both standard signing with a keypair and "keyless signing" with Fulcio. If an attacker has access to the signature in OCI, they can manipulate cosign into believing the entry was stored in Rekor even though it wasn't. The vulnerability has been patched in v1.5.2 of Cosign. The `signature` in the `signedEntryTimestamp` provided by Rekor is now compared to the `signature` that is being verified. If these don't match, then an error is returned. If a valid bundle is copied to a different signature, verification should fail. Cosign output now only informs the user that certificates were verified if a certificate was in fact verified. There is currently no known workaround. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22946 | 2 Oracle, Vmware | 6 Commerce Guided Search, Communications Cloud Native Core Binding Support Function, Communications Cloud Native Core Console and 3 more | 2024-08-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| In spring cloud gateway versions prior to 3.1.1+ , applications that are configured to enable HTTP2 and no key store or trusted certificates are set will be configured to use an insecure TrustManager. This makes the gateway able to connect to remote services with invalid or custom certificates. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22885 | 1 Hutool | 1 Hutool | 2024-08-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| Hutool v5.7.18's HttpRequest was discovered to ignore all TLS/SSL certificate validation. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22747 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 6 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird and 3 more | 2024-08-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| After accepting an untrusted certificate, handling an empty pkcs7 sequence as part of the certificate data could have lead to a crash. This crash is believed to be unexploitable. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 91.5, Firefox < 96, and Thunderbird < 91.5. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22576 | 6 Brocade, Debian, Haxx and 3 more | 18 Fabric Operating System, Debian Linux, Curl and 15 more | 2024-08-03 | 8.1 High |
| An improper authentication vulnerability exists in curl 7.33.0 to and including 7.82.0 which might allow reuse OAUTH2-authenticated connections without properly making sure that the connection was authenticated with the same credentials as set for this transfer. This affects SASL-enabled protocols: SMPTP(S), IMAP(S), POP3(S) and LDAP(S) (openldap only). | ||||
| CVE-2022-21656 | 1 Envoyproxy | 1 Envoy | 2024-08-03 | 7.4 High |
| Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. The default_validator.cc implementation used to implement the default certificate validation routines has a "type confusion" bug when processing subjectAltNames. This processing allows, for example, an rfc822Name or uniformResourceIndicator to be authenticated as a domain name. This confusion allows for the bypassing of nameConstraints, as processed by the underlying OpenSSL/BoringSSL implementation, exposing the possibility of impersonation of arbitrary servers. As a result Envoy will trust upstream certificates that should not be trusted. | ||||
| CVE-2022-21657 | 1 Envoyproxy | 1 Envoy | 2024-08-03 | 6.8 Medium |
| Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. In affected versions Envoy does not restrict the set of certificates it accepts from the peer, either as a TLS client or a TLS server, to only those certificates that contain the necessary extendedKeyUsage (id-kp-serverAuth and id-kp-clientAuth, respectively). This means that a peer may present an e-mail certificate (e.g. id-kp-emailProtection), either as a leaf certificate or as a CA in the chain, and it will be accepted for TLS. This is particularly bad when combined with the issue described in pull request #630, in that it allows a Web PKI CA that is intended only for use with S/MIME, and thus exempted from audit or supervision, to issue TLS certificates that will be accepted by Envoy. As a result Envoy will trust upstream certificates that should not be trusted. There are no known workarounds to this issue. Users are advised to upgrade. | ||||
| CVE-2022-21654 | 2 Envoyproxy, Redhat | 2 Envoy, Service Mesh | 2024-08-03 | 7.4 High |
| Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy, designed for cloud-native applications. Envoy's tls allows re-use when some cert validation settings have changed from their default configuration. The only workaround for this issue is to ensure that default tls settings are used. Users are advised to upgrade. | ||||
| CVE-2022-21170 | 1 Daj | 6 Dspa-15000 M5, Dspa-2000 M4, Dspa-4000 M4 and 3 more | 2024-08-03 | 3.7 Low |
| Improper check for certificate revocation in i-FILTER Ver.10.45R01 and earlier, i-FILTER Ver.9.50R10 and earlier, i-FILTER Browser & Cloud MultiAgent for Windows Ver.4.93R04 and earlier, and D-SPA (Ver.3 / Ver.4) using i-FILTER allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack and eavesdrop on an encrypted communication. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20960 | 1 Cisco | 1 Email Security Appliance | 2024-08-03 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of certain TLS connections that are processed by an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by establishing a large number of concurrent TLS connections to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to drop new TLS email messages that come from the associated email servers. Exploitation of this vulnerability does not cause the affected device to unexpectedly reload. The device will recover autonomously within a few hours of when the attack is halted or mitigated. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20081 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 27 Android, Mt6580, Mt6735 and 24 more | 2024-08-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| In A-GPS, there is a possible man in the middle attack due to improper certificate validation. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS06461919; Issue ID: ALPS06461919. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20071 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 8 Android, Mt6833, Mt6853 and 5 more | 2024-08-03 | 6.7 Medium |
| In ccu, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing certificate validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is no needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS06183315; Issue ID: ALPS06183315. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20034 | 2 Google, Mediatek | 22 Android, Mt6580, Mt6735 and 19 more | 2024-08-03 | 6.8 Medium |
| In Preloader XFLASH, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to an improper certificate validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege for an attacker who has physical access to the device with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS06160806; Issue ID: ALPS06160806. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4895 | 2 Hitachi, Linux | 3 Infrastructure Analytics Advisor, Ops Center Analyzer, Linux Kernel | 2024-08-03 | 8.6 High |
| Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor on Linux (Analytics probe component), Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer on Linux (Analyzer probe component) allows Man in the Middle Attack.This issue affects Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor: from 2.0.0-00 through 4.4.0-00; Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer: from 10.0.0-00 before 10.9.1-00. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3913 | 1 Rapid7 | 1 Nexpose | 2024-08-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| Rapid7 Nexpose and InsightVM versions 6.6.82 through 6.6.177 fail to validate the certificate of the update server when downloading updates. This failure could allow an attacker in a privileged position on the network to provide their own HTTPS endpoint, or intercept communications to the legitimate endpoint. The attacker would need some pre-existing access to at least one node on the network path between the Rapid7-controlled update server and the Nexpose/InsightVM application, and the ability to either spoof the update server's FQDN or redirect legitimate traffic to the attacker's server in order to exploit this vulnerability. Note that even in this scenario, an attacker could not normally replace an update package with a malicious package, since the update process validates a separate, code-signing certificate, distinct from the HTTPS certificate used for communication. This issue was resolved on February 1, 2023 in update 6.6.178 of Nexpose and InsightVM. | ||||