Total
11827 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-26047 | 1 Intel | 352 Converged Security And Manageability Engine, Core I3-1000g1 Firmware, Core I3-1000g4 Firmware and 349 more | 2024-08-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| Improper input validation for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi, Intel vPro(R) CSME WiFi and Killer(TM) WiFi products may allow unauthenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2022-26100 | 1 Sap | 1 Sapcar | 2024-08-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| SAPCAR - version 7.22, does not contain sufficient input validation on the SAPCAR archive. As a result, the SAPCAR process may crash, and the attacker may obtain privileged access to the system. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25976 | 1 Intel | 1 Virtual Raid On Cpu | 2024-08-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| Improper input validation in the Intel(R) VROC software before version 7.7.6.1003 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25818 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-08-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper boundary check in UWB stack prior to SMR Mar-2022 Release 1 allows arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25751 | 1 Siemens | 48 Scalance X302-7eec, Scalance X302-7eec Firmware, Scalance X304-2fe and 45 more | 2024-08-03 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X304-2FE, SCALANCE X306-1LD FE, SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X320-1 FE, SCALANCE X320-1-2LD FE, SCALANCE X408-2, SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE TS (24V, ports on front), SIPLUS NET SCALANCE X308-2. Affected devices do not properly validate the HTTP headers of incoming requests. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash affected devices. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25757 | 1 Apache | 1 Apisix | 2024-08-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Apache APISIX before 2.13.0, when decoding JSON with duplicate keys, lua-cjson will choose the last occurred value as the result. By passing a JSON with a duplicate key, the attacker can bypass the body_schema validation in the request-validation plugin. For example, `{"string_payload":"bad","string_payload":"good"}` can be used to hide the "bad" input. Systems satisfy three conditions below are affected by this attack: 1. use body_schema validation in the request-validation plugin 2. upstream application uses a special JSON library that chooses the first occurred value, like jsoniter or gojay 3. upstream application does not validate the input anymore. The fix in APISIX is to re-encode the validated JSON input back into the request body at the side of APISIX. Improper Input Validation vulnerability in __COMPONENT__ of Apache APISIX allows an attacker to __IMPACT__. This issue affects Apache APISIX Apache APISIX version 2.12.1 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25729 | 1 Qualcomm | 60 Ar8031, Ar8031 Firmware, Csra6620 and 57 more | 2024-08-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| Memory corruption in modem due to improper length check while copying into memory | ||||
| CVE-2022-25271 | 2 Drupal, Fedoraproject | 2 Drupal, Fedora | 2024-08-03 | 7.5 High |
| Drupal core's form API has a vulnerability where certain contributed or custom modules' forms may be vulnerable to improper input validation. This could allow an attacker to inject disallowed values or overwrite data. Affected forms are uncommon, but in certain cases an attacker could alter critical or sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25273 | 1 Drupal | 1 Drupal | 2024-08-03 | 7.5 High |
| Drupal core's form API has a vulnerability where certain contributed or custom modules' forms may be vulnerable to improper input validation. This could allow an attacker to inject disallowed values or overwrite data. Affected forms are uncommon, but in certain cases an attacker could alter critical or sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25167 | 1 Apache | 1 Flume | 2024-08-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| Apache Flume versions 1.4.0 through 1.9.0 are vulnerable to a remote code execution (RCE) attack when a configuration uses a JMS Source with a JNDI LDAP data source URI when an attacker has control of the target LDAP server. This issue is fixed by limiting JNDI to allow only the use of the java protocol or no protocol. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25163 | 2 Mistubishi, Mitsubishi | 6 Melsec Qj71e71-100, Melsec Iq-r Rd81mes96n, Melsec Iq-r Rd81mes96n Firmware and 3 more | 2024-08-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q Series QJ71E71-100 first 5 digits of serial number "24061" or prior, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-L series LJ71E71-100 first 5 digits of serial number "24061" or prior and Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R Series RD81MES96N firmware version "08" or prior allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition or execute malicious code on the target products by sending specially crafted packets. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25161 | 2 Mitsubhishielectric, Mitsubishielectric | 194 Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/ds, Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/ds Firmware, Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/dss and 191 more | 2024-08-03 | 8.6 High |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U-xMy/z(x=32,64,80, y=T,R, z=ES,DS,ESS,DSS) with serial number 17X**** or later and versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U-xMy/z(x=32,64,80, y=T,R, z=ES,DS,ESS,DSS) with serial number 179**** and prior and versions prior to 1.073, MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-xMy/z(x=32,64,96, y=T,R, z=D,DSS) with serial number 17X**** or later and versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-xMy/z(x=32,64,96, y=T,R, z=D,DSS) with serial number 179**** and prior and versions prior to 1.073, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MT/DS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MT/DSS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MR/DS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ-xMy/z(x=24,40,60, y=T,R, z=ES,ESS) versions prior to 1.030, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ-xMy/ES-A(x=24,40,60, y=T,R) versions prior to 1.031 and Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5S-xMy/z(x=30,40,60,80, y=T,R, z=ES,ESS) version 1.000 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a DoS condition for the product's program execution or communication by sending specially crafted packets. System reset of the product is required for recovery. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25162 | 2 Mitsubhishielectric, Mitsubishielectric | 194 Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/ds, Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/ds Firmware, Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/dss and 191 more | 2024-08-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U-xMy/z(x=32,64,80, y=T,R, z=ES,DS,ESS,DSS) with serial number 17X**** or later and versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U-xMy/z(x=32,64,80, y=T,R, z=ES,DS,ESS,DSS) with serial number 179**** and prior and versions prior to 1.073, MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-xMy/z(x=32,64,96, y=T,R, z=D,DSS) with serial number 17X**** or later and versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-xMy/z(x=32,64,96, y=T,R, z=D,DSS) with serial number 179**** and prior and versions prior to 1.073, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MT/DS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MT/DSS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MR/DS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ-xMy/z(x=24,40,60, y=T,R, z=ES,ESS) versions prior to 1.030, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ-xMy/ES-A(x=24,40,60, y=T,R) versions prior to 1.031 and Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5S-xMy/z(x=30,40,60,80, y=T,R, z=ES,ESS) version 1.000 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a temporary DoS condition for the product's communication by sending specially crafted packets. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24926 | 1 Samsung | 1 Smarttagplugin | 2024-08-03 | 5.7 Medium |
| Improper input validation vulnerability in SmartTagPlugin prior to version 1.2.15-6 allows privileged attackers to trigger a XSS on a victim's devices. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24925 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-08-03 | 4.4 Medium |
| Improper input validation vulnerability in SettingsProvider prior to Android S(12) allows privileged attackers to trigger a permanent denial of service attack on a victim's devices. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24952 | 1 Eternal Terminal Project | 1 Eternal Terminal | 2024-08-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Several denial of service vulnerabilities exist in Eternal Terminal prior to version 6.2.0, including a DoS triggered remotely by an invalid sequence number and a local bug triggered by invalid input sent directly to the IPC socket. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24881 | 1 Ballcat | 1 Codegen | 2024-08-03 | 8.8 High |
| Ballcat Codegen provides the function of online editing code to generate templates. In versions prior to 1.0.0.beta.2, attackers can implement remote code execution through malicious code injection of the template engine. This happens because Velocity and freemarker templates are introduced but input verification is not done. The fault is rectified in version 1.0.0.beta.2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24846 | 1 Geoserver | 1 Geowebcache | 2024-08-03 | 9.1 Critical |
| GeoWebCache is a tile caching server implemented in Java. The GeoWebCache disk quota mechanism can perform an unchecked JNDI lookup, which in turn can be used to perform class deserialization and result in arbitrary code execution. While in GeoWebCache the JNDI strings are provided via local configuration file, in GeoServer a user interface is provided to perform the same, that can be accessed remotely, and requires admin-level login to be used. These lookup are unrestricted in scope and can lead to code execution. The lookups are going to be restricted in GeoWebCache 1.21.0, 1.20.2, 1.19.3. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24806 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2024-08-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| net-snmp provides various tools relating to the Simple Network Management Protocol. Prior to version 5.9.2, a user with read-write credentials can exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability when SETing malformed OIDs in master agent and subagent simultaneously. Version 5.9.2 contains a patch. Users should use strong SNMPv3 credentials and avoid sharing the credentials. Those who must use SNMPv1 or SNMPv2c should use a complex community string and enhance the protection by restricting access to a given IP address range. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24828 | 3 Fedoraproject, Getcomposer, Tenable | 3 Fedora, Composer, Tenable.sc | 2024-08-03 | 8.3 High |
| Composer is a dependency manager for the PHP programming language. Integrators using Composer code to call `VcsDriver::getFileContent` can have a code injection vulnerability if the user can control the `$file` or `$identifier` argument. This leads to a vulnerability on packagist.org for example where the composer.json's `readme` field can be used as a vector for injecting parameters into hg/Mercurial via the `$file` argument, or git via the `$identifier` argument if you allow arbitrary data there (Packagist does not, but maybe other integrators do). Composer itself should not be affected by the vulnerability as it does not call `getFileContent` with arbitrary data into `$file`/`$identifier`. To the best of our knowledge this was not abused, and the vulnerability has been patched on packagist.org and Private Packagist within a day of the vulnerability report. | ||||