Total
141 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-1728 | 2 Quarkus, Redhat | 5 Quarkus, Jboss Single Sign On, Keycloak and 2 more | 2024-08-04 | 4.8 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in all versions of Keycloak where, the pages on the Admin Console area of the application are completely missing general HTTP security headers in HTTP-responses. This does not directly lead to a security issue, yet it might aid attackers in their efforts to exploit other problems. The flaws unnecessarily make the servers more prone to Clickjacking, channel downgrade attacks and other similar client-based attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2020-1761 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2024-08-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the OpenShift web console, where the access token is stored in the browser's local storage. An attacker can use this flaw to get the access token via physical access, or an XSS attack on the victim's browser. This flaw affects openshift/console versions before openshift/console-4. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42017 | 1 Siemens | 54 Ruggedcom I800, Ruggedcom I801, Ruggedcom I802 and 51 more | 2024-08-04 | 5.9 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100F, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200F, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969F, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400F, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416F, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PF, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900F, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GF, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPF, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GF, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488F, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. A new variant of the POODLE attack has left a third-party component vulnerable due to the implementation flaws of the CBC encryption mode in TLS 1.0 to 1.2. If an attacker were to exploit this, they could act as a man-in-the-middle and eavesdrop on encrypted communications. | ||||
| CVE-2021-21387 | 1 Wrongthink | 1 Wrongthink | 2024-08-03 | 8.1 High |
| Wrongthink peer-to-peer, end-to-end encrypted messenger with PeerJS and Axolotl ratchet. In wrongthink from version 2.0.0 and before 2.3.0 there was a set of vulnerabilities causing inadequate encryption strength. Part of the secret identity key was disclosed by the fingerprint used for connection. Additionally, the safety number was improperly calculated. It was computed using part of one of the public identity keys instead of being derived from both public identity keys. This caused issues in computing safety numbers which would potentially be exploitable in the real world. Additionally there was inadequate encryption strength due to use of 1024-bit DSA keys. These issues are all fixed in version 2.3.0. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3448 | 4 Fedoraproject, Oracle, Redhat and 1 more | 4 Fedora, Communications Cloud Native Core Network Function Cloud Native Environment, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-08-03 | 4.0 Medium |
| A flaw was found in dnsmasq in versions before 2.85. When configured to use a specific server for a given network interface, dnsmasq uses a fixed port while forwarding queries. An attacker on the network, able to find the outgoing port used by dnsmasq, only needs to guess the random transmission ID to forge a reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This flaw makes a DNS Cache Poisoning attack much easier. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2022-27219 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinema Remote Connect Server | 2024-08-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V3.0 SP2). Affected application is missing general HTTP security headers in the web server configured on port 443. This could aid attackers by making the servers more prone to clickjacking, channel downgrade attacks and other similar client-based attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2022-27220 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinema Remote Connect Server | 2024-08-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V3.0 SP2). Affected application is missing general HTTP security headers in the web server configured on port 6220. This could aid attackers by making the servers more prone to clickjacking, channel downgrade attacks and other similar client-based attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2324 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Email Security | 2024-08-03 | 7.5 High |
| Improperly Implemented Security Check vulnerability in the SonicWall Hosted Email Security leads to bypass of Capture ATP security service in the appliance. This vulnerability impacts 10.0.17.7319 and earlier versions | ||||
| CVE-2023-30456 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 4 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus and 1 more | 2024-08-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c in the Linux kernel before 6.2.8. nVMX on x86_64 lacks consistency checks for CR0 and CR4. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28113 | 1 Russh Project | 1 Russh | 2024-08-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. Starting in version 0.34.0 and prior to versions 0.36.2 and 0.37.1, Diffie-Hellman key validation is insufficient, which can lead to insecure shared secrets and therefore breaks confidentiality. Connections between a russh client and server or those of a russh peer with some other misbehaving peer are most likely to be problematic. These may vulnerable to eavesdropping. Most other implementations reject such keys, so this is mainly an interoperability issue in such a case. This issue is fixed in versions 0.36.2 and 0.37.1 | ||||
| CVE-2023-22393 | 1 Juniper | 2 Junos, Junos Os Evolved | 2024-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in BGP route processing of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an attacker to cause Routing Protocol Daemon (RPD) crash by sending a BGP route with invalid next-hop resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue only affects systems without import policy configured. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S4; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-S2; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R2-S2, 21.4R3; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R1-S2, 22.1R2; 22.2 versions prior to 22.2R1-S1, 22.2R2. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved 21.4-EVO versions prior to 21.4R2-S2-EVO, 21.4R3-EVO; 22.1-EVO versions prior to 22.1R1-S2-EVO, 22.1R2-EVO; 22.2-EVO versions prior to 22.2R1-S1-EVO, 22.2R2-EVO. This issue does not affect: Juniper Networks Junos OS versions prior to 21.1R1. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved versions prior to 21.3R1-EVO. | ||||
| CVE-2023-21967 | 4 Debian, Netapp, Oracle and 1 more | 17 Debian Linux, 7-mode Transition Tool, Brocade San Navigator and 14 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: JSSE). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u361, 8u361-perf, 11.0.18, 17.0.6, 20; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.9, 21.3.5 and 22.3.1. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability can also be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through a web service which supplies data to the APIs. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.9 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2023-4039 | 1 Gnu | 1 Gcc | 2024-08-02 | 4.8 Medium |
| **DISPUTED**A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables. The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in controlled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer overflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change program flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2585 | 1 Redhat | 8 Enterprise Linux, Openshift Container Platform, Openshift Container Platform For Ibm Z and 5 more | 2024-08-02 | 3.5 Low |
| Keycloak's device authorization grant does not correctly validate the device code and client ID. An attacker client could abuse the missing validation to spoof a client consent request and trick an authorization admin into granting consent to a malicious OAuth client or possible unauthorized access to an existing OAuth client. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27842 | 2024-08-02 | 8.1 High | ||
| The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.5. An app may be able to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27758 | 1 Rpyc Project | 1 Rpyc | 2024-08-02 | 8.4 High |
| In RPyC before 6.0.0, when a server exposes a method that calls the attribute named __array__ for a client-provided netref (e.g., np.array(client_netref)), a remote attacker can craft a class that results in remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25545 | 2024-08-01 | 7.8 High | ||
| An issue in Weave Weave Desktop v.7.78.10 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted script to the nwjs framework component. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6101 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-08-01 | 8.8 High |
| Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 126.0.6478.114 allowed a remote attacker to perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2024-5500 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-08-01 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in Sign-In in Google Chrome prior to 1.3.36.351 allowed a remote attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2024-3845 | 2024-08-01 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Inappropriate implementation in Networks in Google Chrome prior to 124.0.6367.60 allowed a remote attacker to bypass mixed content policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||