Total
1095 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-3547 | 1 Oracle | 1 Peoplesoft Enterprise Peopletools | 2024-10-07 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools component of Oracle PeopleSoft Products (subcomponent: MultiChannel Framework). Supported versions that are affected are 8.54 and 8.55. Easily "exploitable" vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools accessible data. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 7.4 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2024-41121 | 1 Woodpecker-ci | 1 Woodpecker | 2024-10-03 | 8.8 High |
| Woodpecker is a simple yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility. The server allow to create any user who can trigger a pipeline run malicious workflows: 1. Those workflows can either lead to a host takeover that runs the agent executing the workflow. 2. Or allow to extract the secrets who would be normally provided to the plugins who's entrypoint are overwritten. This issue has been addressed in release version 2.7.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41122 | 1 Woodpecker-ci | 1 Woodpecker | 2024-10-03 | 7.5 High |
| Woodpecker is a simple yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility. The server allow to create any user who can trigger a pipeline run malicious workflows: 1. Those workflows can either lead to a host takeover that runs the agent executing the workflow. 2. Or allow to extract the secrets who would be normally provided to the plugins who's entrypoint are overwritten. This issue has been addressed in release version 2.7.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40035 | 1 Craftcms | 1 Craft Cms | 2024-10-02 | 7.2 High |
| Craft is a CMS for creating custom digital experiences on the web and beyond. Bypassing the validatePath function can lead to potential remote code execution. This vulnerability can lead to malicious control of vulnerable systems and data exfiltrations. Although the vulnerability is exploitable only in the authenticated users, configuration with ALLOW_ADMIN_CHANGES=true, there is still a potential security threat (Remote Code Execution). This issue has been patched in version 4.4.15 and version 3.8.15. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45302 | 1 Restsharp | 1 Restsharp | 2024-10-01 | 6.1 Medium |
| RestSharp is a Simple REST and HTTP API Client for .NET. The second argument to `RestRequest.AddHeader` (the header value) is vulnerable to CRLF injection. The same applies to `RestRequest.AddOrUpdateHeader` and `RestClient.AddDefaultHeader`. The way HTTP headers are added to a request is via the `HttpHeaders.TryAddWithoutValidation` method which does not check for CRLF characters in the header value. This means that any headers from a `RestSharp.RequestHeaders` object are added to the request in such a way that they are vulnerable to CRLF-injection. In general, CRLF-injection into a HTTP header (when using HTTP/1.1) means that one can inject additional HTTP headers or smuggle whole HTTP requests. If an application using the RestSharp library passes a user-controllable value through to a header, then that application becomes vulnerable to CRLF-injection. This is not necessarily a security issue for a command line application like the one above, but if such code were present in a web application then it becomes vulnerable to request splitting (as shown in the PoC) and thus Server Side Request Forgery. Strictly speaking this is a potential vulnerability in applications using RestSharp, not in RestSharp itself, but I would argue that at the very least there needs to be a warning about this behaviour in the RestSharp documentation. RestSharp has addressed this issue in version 112.0.0. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41039 | 1 Zope | 1 Restrictedpython | 2024-10-01 | 8.3 High |
| RestrictedPython is a restricted execution environment for Python to run untrusted code. Python's "format" functionality allows someone controlling the format string to "read" all objects accessible through recursive attribute lookup and subscription from objects he can access. This can lead to critical information disclosure. With `RestrictedPython`, the format functionality is available via the `format` and `format_map` methods of `str` (and `unicode`) (accessed either via the class or its instances) and via `string.Formatter`. All known versions of `RestrictedPython` are vulnerable. This issue has been addressed in commit `4134aedcff1` which has been included in the 5.4 and 6.2 releases. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2019-2725 | 1 Oracle | 8 Agile Plm, Communications Converged Application Server, Peoplesoft Enterprise Peopletools and 5 more | 2024-10-01 | 9.8 Critical |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Services). Supported versions that are affected are 10.3.6.0.0 and 12.1.3.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebLogic Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebLogic Server. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2023-1523 | 1 Canonical | 2 Snapd, Ubuntu Linux | 2024-10-01 | 10 Critical |
| Using the TIOCLINUX ioctl request, a malicious snap could inject contents into the input of the controlling terminal which could allow it to cause arbitrary commands to be executed outside of the snap sandbox after the snap exits. Graphical terminal emulators like xterm, gnome-terminal and others are not affected - this can only be exploited when snaps are run on a virtual console. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43393 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 72 Fl Mguard 2102, Fl Mguard 2102 Firmware, Fl Mguard 2105 and 69 more | 2024-10-01 | 8.1 High |
| A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the firewall services, including packet filter, packet forwarding, network access control or NAT through the FW_INCOMING.FROM_IP FW_INCOMING.IN_IP FW_OUTGOING.FROM_IP FW_OUTGOING.IN_IP FW_RULESETS.FROM_IP FW_RULESETS.IN_IP environment variable which can lead to a DoS. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43392 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 60 Fl Mguard Centerport Vpn-1000, Fl Mguard Centerport Vpn-1000 Firmware, Fl Mguard Core Tx and 57 more | 2024-10-01 | 8.1 High |
| A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the firewall services, including packet filter, packet forwarding, network access control or NAT through the FW_INCOMING.FROM_IP FW_INCOMING.IN_IP FW_OUTGOING.FROM_IP FW_OUTGOING.IN_IP environment variable which can lead to a DoS. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43391 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 72 Fl Mguard 2102, Fl Mguard 2102 Firmware, Fl Mguard 2105 and 69 more | 2024-10-01 | 8.1 High |
| A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the firewall services, including packet filter, packet forwarding, network access control or NAT through the FW_PORTFORWARDING.SRC_IP environment variable which can lead to a DoS. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43390 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 72 Fl Mguard 2102, Fl Mguard 2102 Firmware, Fl Mguard 2105 and 69 more | 2024-10-01 | 8.1 High |
| A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the firewall services, including packet forwarding or NAT through the FW_NAT.IN_IP environment variable which can lead to a DoS. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43389 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 72 Fl Mguard 2102, Fl Mguard 2102 Firmware, Fl Mguard 2105 and 69 more | 2024-10-01 | 8.1 High |
| A low privileged remote attacker can perform configuration changes of the ospf service through OSPF_INTERFACE.SIMPLE_KEY, OSPF_INTERFACE.DIGEST_KEY environment variables which can lead to a DoS. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4478 | 1 Mattermost | 1 Mattermost Server | 2024-09-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| Mattermost fails to restrict which parameters' values it takes from the request during signup allowing an attacker to register users as inactive, thus blocking them from later accessing Mattermost without the system admin activating their accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47180 | 1 Badges | 1 Shields | 2024-09-30 | 8.8 High |
| Shields.io is a service for concise, consistent, and legible badges in SVG and raster format. Shields.io and users self-hosting their own instance of shields using version < `server-2024-09-25` are vulnerable to a remote execution vulnerability via the JSONPath library used by the Dynamic JSON/Toml/Yaml badges. This vulnerability would allow any user with access to make a request to a URL on the instance to the ability to execute code by crafting a malicious JSONPath expression. All users who self-host an instance are vulnerable. This problem was fixed in server-2024-09-25. Those who follow the tagged releases should update to `server-2024-09-25` or later. Those who follow the rolling tag on DockerHub, `docker pull shieldsio/shields:next` to update to the latest version. As a workaround, blocking access to the endpoints `/badge/dynamic/json`, `/badge/dynamic/toml`, and `/badge/dynamic/yaml` (e.g: via a firewall or reverse proxy in front of your instance) would prevent the exploitable endpoints from being accessed. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43388 | 1 Phoenixcontact | 72 Fl Mguard 2102, Fl Mguard 2102 Firmware, Fl Mguard 2105 and 69 more | 2024-09-27 | 8.8 High |
| A low privileged remote attacker with write permissions can reconfigure the SNMP service due to improper input validation. | ||||
| CVE-2023-43667 | 1 Apache | 1 Inlong | 2024-09-27 | 7.5 High |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') vulnerability in Apache InLong.This issue affects Apache InLong: from 1.4.0 through 1.8.0, the attacker can create misleading or false log records, making it harder to audit and trace malicious activities. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 1.9.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it. [1] https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/8628 | ||||
| CVE-2023-39424 | 1 Resortdata | 1 Internet Reservation Module Next Generation | 2024-09-26 | 9.9 Critical |
| A vulnerability in RDPngFileUpload.dll, as used in the IRM Next Generation booking system, allows a remote attacker to upload arbitrary content (such as a web shell component) to the SQL database and execute it with SYSTEM privileges. This vulnerability requires authentication to be exploited but can be paired with another vulnerability in the platform (CVE-2023-39420, which grants access to hardcoded credentials) to carry the attack without having assigned credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26142 | 1 Crowcpp | 1 Crow | 2024-09-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| All versions of the package crow are vulnerable to HTTP Response Splitting when untrusted user input is used to build header values. Header values are not properly sanitized against CRLF Injection in the set_header and add_header functions. An attacker can add the \r\n (carriage return line feeds) characters to end the HTTP response headers and inject malicious content. | ||||
| CVE-2023-36250 | 1 Gnome | 1 Gnome-time Tracker | 2024-09-25 | 7.8 High |
| CSV Injection vulnerability in GNOME time tracker version 3.0.2, allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted .tsv file when creating a new record. | ||||