Filtered by vendor Zope
Subscriptions
Total
52 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-51734 | 1 Zope | 1 Accesscontrol | 2024-11-21 | 0 Low |
Zope AccessControl provides a general security framework for use in Zope. In affected versions anonymous users can delete the user data maintained by an `AccessControl.userfolder.UserFolder` which may prevent any privileged access. This problem has been fixed in version 7.2. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may address the issue by adding `data__roles__ = ()` to `AccessControl.userfolder.UserFolder`. | ||||
CVE-2024-47532 | 1 Zope | 1 Restrictedpython | 2024-11-15 | 6.5 Medium |
RestrictedPython is a restricted execution environment for Python to run untrusted code. A user can gain access to protected (and potentially sensible) information indirectly via AttributeError.obj and the string module. The problem will be fixed in version 7.3. As a workaround, If the application does not require access to the module string, it can remove it from RestrictedPython.Utilities.utility_builtins or otherwise do not make it available in the restricted execution environment. | ||||
CVE-2023-37271 | 1 Zope | 1 Restrictedpython | 2024-11-07 | 8.4 High |
RestrictedPython is a tool that helps to define a subset of the Python language which allows users to provide a program input into a trusted environment. RestrictedPython does not check access to stack frames and their attributes. Stack frames are accessible within at least generators and generator expressions, which are allowed inside RestrictedPython. Prior to versions 6.1 and 5.3, an attacker with access to a RestrictedPython environment can write code that gets the current stack frame in a generator and then walk the stack all the way beyond the RestrictedPython invocation boundary, thus breaking out of the restricted sandbox and potentially allowing arbitrary code execution in the Python interpreter. All RestrictedPython deployments that allow untrusted users to write Python code in the RestrictedPython environment are at risk. In terms of Zope and Plone, this would mean deployments where the administrator allows untrusted users to create and/or edit objects of type `Script (Python)`, `DTML Method`, `DTML Document` or `Zope Page Template`. This is a non-default configuration and likely to be extremely rare. The problem has been fixed in versions 6.1 and 5.3. | ||||
CVE-2023-41039 | 1 Zope | 1 Restrictedpython | 2024-10-01 | 8.3 High |
RestrictedPython is a restricted execution environment for Python to run untrusted code. Python's "format" functionality allows someone controlling the format string to "read" all objects accessible through recursive attribute lookup and subscription from objects he can access. This can lead to critical information disclosure. With `RestrictedPython`, the format functionality is available via the `format` and `format_map` methods of `str` (and `unicode`) (accessed either via the class or its instances) and via `string.Formatter`. All known versions of `RestrictedPython` are vulnerable. This issue has been addressed in commit `4134aedcff1` which has been included in the 5.4 and 6.2 releases. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
CVE-2023-41050 | 1 Zope | 2 Accesscontrol, Zope | 2024-09-26 | 6.8 Medium |
AccessControl provides a general security framework for use in Zope. Python's "format" functionality allows someone controlling the format string to "read" objects accessible (recursively) via attribute access and subscription from accessible objects. Those attribute accesses and subscriptions use Python's full blown `getattr` and `getitem`, not the policy restricted `AccessControl` variants `_getattr_` and `_getitem_`. This can lead to critical information disclosure. `AccessControl` already provides a safe variant for `str.format` and denies access to `string.Formatter`. However, `str.format_map` is still unsafe. Affected are all users who allow untrusted users to create `AccessControl` controlled Python code and execute it. A fix has been introduced in versions 4.4, 5.8 and 6.2. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
CVE-2023-42458 | 1 Zope | 1 Zope | 2024-09-24 | 3.7 Low |
Zope is an open-source web application server. Prior to versions 4.8.10 and 5.8.5, there is a stored cross site scripting vulnerability for SVG images. Note that an image tag with an SVG image as source is never vulnerable, even when the SVG image contains malicious code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would first need to upload an image, and then trick a user into following a specially crafted link. Patches are available in Zope 4.8.10 and 5.8.5. As a workaround, make sure the "Add Documents, Images, and Files" permission is only assigned to trusted roles. By default, only the Manager has this permission. | ||||
CVE-2012-6661 | 2 Plone, Zope | 2 Plone, Zope | 2024-09-16 | N/A |
Zope before 2.13.19, as used in Plone before 4.2.3 and 4.3 before beta 1, does not reseed the pseudo-random number generator (PRNG), which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the value via unspecified vectors. NOTE: this issue was SPLIT from CVE-2012-5508 due to different vulnerability types (ADT2). | ||||
CVE-2009-2701 | 1 Zope | 1 Zodb | 2024-09-16 | N/A |
Unspecified vulnerability in the Zope Enterprise Objects (ZEO) storage-server functionality in Zope Object Database (ZODB) 3.8 before 3.8.3 and 3.9.x before 3.9.0c2, when certain ZEO database sharing and blob support are enabled, allows remote authenticated users to read or delete arbitrary files via unknown vectors. | ||||
CVE-2010-3198 | 1 Zope | 1 Zope | 2024-09-16 | N/A |
ZServer in Zope 2.10.x before 2.10.12 and 2.11.x before 2.11.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash of worker threads) via vectors that trigger uncaught exceptions. | ||||
CVE-2000-1211 | 2 Redhat, Zope | 2 Powertools, Zope | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Zope 2.2.0 through 2.2.4 does not properly perform security registration for legacy names of object constructors such as DTML method objects, which could allow attackers to perform unauthorized activities. | ||||
CVE-2000-1212 | 2 Redhat, Zope | 2 Powertools, Zope | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Zope 2.2.0 through 2.2.4 does not properly protect a data updating method on Image and File objects, which allows attackers with DTML editing privileges to modify the raw data of these objects. | ||||
CVE-2000-0725 | 1 Zope | 1 Zope | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Zope before 2.2.1 does not properly restrict access to the getRoles method, which allows users who can edit DTML to add or modify roles by modifying the roles list that is included in a request. | ||||
CVE-2000-0483 | 2 Redhat, Zope | 2 Linux Powertools, Zope | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
The DocumentTemplate package in Zope 2.2 and earlier allows a remote attacker to modify DTMLDocuments or DTMLMethods without authorization. | ||||
CVE-2000-0062 | 1 Zope | 1 Zope | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
The DTML implementation in the Z Object Publishing Environment (Zope) allows remote attackers to conduct unauthorized activities. | ||||
CVE-2001-1278 | 1 Zope | 1 Zope | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Zope before 2.2.4 allows partially trusted users to bypass security controls for certain methods by accessing the methods through the fmt attribute of dtml-var tags. | ||||
CVE-2001-1227 | 2 Redhat, Zope | 3 Linux, Powertools, Zope | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Zope before 2.2.4 allows partially trusted users to bypass security controls for certain methods by accessing the methods through the fmt attribute of dtml-var tags. | ||||
CVE-2001-0569 | 2 Redhat, Zope | 2 Powertools, Zope | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Digital Creations Zope 2.3.1 b1 and earlier contains a problem in the method return values related to the classes (1) ObjectManager, (2) PropertyManager, and (3) PropertySheet. | ||||
CVE-2001-0567 | 2 Redhat, Zope | 2 Powertools, Zope | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Digital Creations Zope 2.3.2 and earlier allows a local attacker to gain additional privileges via the changing of ZClass permission mappings for objects and methods in the ZClass. | ||||
CVE-2001-0568 | 2 Redhat, Zope | 2 Powertools, Zope | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Digital Creations Zope 2.3.1 b1 and earlier allows a local attacker (Zope user) with through-the-web scripting capabilities to alter ZClasses class attributes. | ||||
CVE-2001-0128 | 6 Conectiva, Debian, Freebsd and 3 more | 8 Linux, Debian Linux, Freebsd and 5 more | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
Zope before 2.2.4 does not properly compute local roles, which could allow users to bypass specified access restrictions and gain privileges. |