Search Results (1569 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2015-3406 2 Canonical, Module-signature Project 2 Ubuntu Linux, Module-signature 2024-11-21 7.5 High
The PGP signature parsing in Module::Signature before 0.74 allows remote attackers to cause the unsigned portion of a SIGNATURE file to be treated as the signed portion via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2015-3298 1 Yubico 1 Ykneo-openpgp 2024-11-21 8.8 High
Yubico ykneo-openpgp before 1.0.10 has a typo in which an invalid PIN can be used. When first powered up, a signature will be issued even though the PIN has not been validated.
CVE-2015-1853 2 Redhat, Tuxfamily 2 Enterprise Linux, Chrony 2024-11-21 6.5 Medium
chrony before 1.31.1 does not properly protect state variables in authenticated symmetric NTP associations, which allows remote attackers with knowledge of NTP peering to cause a denial of service (inability to synchronize) via random timestamps in crafted NTP data packets.
CVE-2014-3585 1 Redhat 3 Enterprise Linux, Redhat-upgrade-tool, Rhel Extras Other 2024-11-21 9.8 Critical
redhat-upgrade-tool: Does not check GPG signatures when upgrading versions
CVE-2013-2167 3 Debian, Openstack, Redhat 3 Debian Linux, Python-keystoneclient, Openstack 2024-11-21 9.8 Critical
python-keystoneclient version 0.2.3 to 0.2.5 has middleware memcache signing bypass
CVE-2013-2166 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Openstack and 1 more 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Python-keystoneclient and 1 more 2024-11-21 9.8 Critical
python-keystoneclient version 0.2.3 to 0.2.5 has middleware memcache encryption bypass
CVE-2013-1910 2 Baseurl, Debian 2 Yum, Debian Linux 2024-11-21 9.8 Critical
yum does not properly handle bad metadata, which allows an attacker to cause a denial of service and possibly have other unspecified impact via a Trojan horse file in the metadata of a remote repository.
CVE-2012-2092 1 Canonical 1 Ubuntu Cobbler 2024-11-21 5.9 Medium
A Security Bypass vulnerability exists in Ubuntu Cobbler before 2,2,2 in the cobbler-ubuntu-import script due to an error when verifying the GPG signature.
CVE-2011-3374 1 Debian 2 Advanced Package Tool, Debian Linux 2024-11-21 3.7 Low
It was found that apt-key in apt, all versions, do not correctly validate gpg keys with the master keyring, leading to a potential man-in-the-middle attack.
CVE-2024-10534 2 Dataprom, Dataprom Informatics 3 Personnel Attendance Control Systems \/ Access Control Security Systems, Access Control Security Systems, Personnel Attendance Control Systems 2024-11-19 9.8 Critical
Origin Validation Error vulnerability in Dataprom Informatics Personnel Attendance Control Systems (PACS) / Access Control Security Systems (ACSS) allows Traffic Injection.This issue affects Personnel Attendance Control Systems (PACS) / Access Control Security Systems (ACSS): before 2024.
CVE-2024-52299 2 Xwiki, Xwikisas 2 Pdf Viewer Macro, Macro Pdfviewer 2024-11-18 7.5 High
macro-pdfviewer is a PDF Viewer Macro for XWiki using Mozilla pdf.js. Any user with view right on XWiki.PDFViewerService can access any attachment stored in the wiki as the "key" that is passed to prevent this is computed incorrectly, calling skip on the digest stream doesn't update the digest. This is fixed in 2.5.6.
CVE-2024-9487 1 Github 1 Enterprise Server 2024-11-15 9.1 Critical
An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed SAML SSO authentication to be bypassed resulting in unauthorized provisioning of users and access to the instance. Exploitation required the encrypted assertions feature to be enabled, and the attacker would require direct network access as well as a signed SAML response or metadata document. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.15 and was fixed in versions 3.11.16, 3.12.10, 3.13.5, and 3.14.2. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
CVE-2024-47867 1 Gradio Project 1 Gradio 2024-11-15 7.5 High
Gradio is an open-source Python package designed for quick prototyping. This vulnerability is a **lack of integrity check** on the downloaded FRP client, which could potentially allow attackers to introduce malicious code. If an attacker gains access to the remote URL from which the FRP client is downloaded, they could modify the binary without detection, as the Gradio server does not verify the file's checksum or signature. Any users utilizing the Gradio server's sharing mechanism that downloads the FRP client could be affected by this vulnerability, especially those relying on the executable binary for secure data tunneling. There is no direct workaround for this issue without upgrading. However, users can manually validate the integrity of the downloaded FRP client by implementing checksum or signature verification in their own environment to ensure the binary hasn't been tampered with.
CVE-2024-40592 1 Fortinet 2 Forticlient, Forticlientmac 2024-11-14 6.8 Medium
An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability [CWE-347] in FortiClient MacOS version 7.4.0, version 7.2.4 and below, version 7.0.10 and below, version 6.4.10 and below may allow a local authenticated attacker to swap the installer with a malicious package via a race condition during the installation process.
CVE-2024-51526 1 Huawei 1 Harmonyos 2024-11-07 8.2 High
Permission control vulnerability in the hidebug module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality.
CVE-2024-6674 2 Lollms, Parisneo 2 Lollms Web Ui, Lollms-webui 2024-11-01 7.1 High
A CORS misconfiguration in parisneo/lollms-webui prior to version 10 allows attackers to steal sensitive information such as logs, browser sessions, and settings containing private API keys from other services. This vulnerability can also enable attackers to perform actions on behalf of a user, such as deleting a project or sending a message. The issue impacts the confidentiality and integrity of the information.
CVE-2024-50347 2024-11-01 N/A
Laravel Reverb provides a real-time WebSocket communication backend for Laravel applications. Prior to 1.4.0, there is an issue where verification signatures for requests sent to Reverb's Pusher-compatible API were not being verified. This API is used in scenarios such as broadcasting a message from a backend service or for obtaining statistical information (such as number of connections) about a given channel. This issue only affects the Pusher-compatible API endpoints and not the WebSocket connections themselves. In order to exploit this vulnerability, the application ID which, should never be exposed, would need to be known by an attacker. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.0.
CVE-2024-8036 2024-10-30 5.9 Medium
ABB is aware of privately reported vulnerabilities in the product versions referenced in this CVE. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a specially crafted firmware or configuration to the system node, causing the node to stop, become inaccessible, or allowing the attacker to take control of the node.
CVE-2024-47880 1 Openrefine 1 Openrefine 2024-10-30 8.1 High
OpenRefine is a free, open source tool for working with messy data. Prior to version 3.8.3, the `export-rows` command can be used in such a way that it reflects part of the request verbatim, with a Content-Type header also taken from the request. An attacker could lead a user to a malicious page that submits a form POST that contains embedded JavaScript code. This code would then be included in the response, along with an attacker-controlled `Content-Type` header, and so potentially executed in the victim's browser as if it was part of OpenRefine. The attacker-provided code can do anything the user can do, including deleting projects, retrieving database passwords, or executing arbitrary Jython or Closure expressions, if those extensions are also present. The attacker must know a valid project ID of a project that contains at least one row. Version 3.8.3 fixes the issue.
CVE-2024-41254 1 Litestream 1 Litestream 2024-10-29 5.3 Medium
An issue was discovered in litestream v0.3.13. The usage of the ssh.InsecureIgnoreHostKey() disables host key verification, possibly allowing attackers to obtain sensitive information via a man-in-the-middle attack.