| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The issue was resolved by blocking unsigned services from launching on Intel Macs. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8, macOS Sequoia 15.7. An app may be able to access protected user data. |
| This issue was addressed by removing the vulnerable code. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8, macOS Sequoia 15.7. An app may be able to access protected user data. |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in visionOS 26, tvOS 26, iOS 26 and iPadOS 26, watchOS 26. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. |
| This issue was addressed by removing the vulnerable code. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8, macOS Sequoia 15.7. An app may be able to access user-sensitive data. |
| This issue was addressed with additional entitlement checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8, macOS Sequoia 15.7. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. |
| A logic issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8, macOS Sequoia 15.7. A malicious app may be able to access private information. |
| An issue existed in the handling of environment variables. This issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in watchOS 26.1, iOS 26.1 and iPadOS 26.1, tvOS 26.1. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. |
| A permissions issue was addressed by removing the vulnerable code. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8, macOS Sequoia 15.7. An app may be able to modify protected parts of the file system. |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8, macOS Sequoia 15.7. An app may be able to access protected user data. |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8. An app may be able to access protected user data. |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8, macOS Sequoia 15.7. An app may be able to access protected user data. |
| A logic issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8, macOS Sequoia 15.7. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. |
| Improper access control of endpoint in HCL Domino Leap
allows certain admin users to import applications from the
server's filesystem. |
| BlueZ HID over GATT Profile Improper Access Control Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of BlueZ. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability.
The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the HID over GATT Profile. The issue results from the lack of authorization prior to allowing access to functionality. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-25177. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: prevent nf_skb_duplicated corruption
syzbot found that nf_dup_ipv4() or nf_dup_ipv6() could write
per-cpu variable nf_skb_duplicated in an unsafe way [1].
Disabling preemption as hinted by the splat is not enough,
we have to disable soft interrupts as well.
[1]
BUG: using __this_cpu_write() in preemptible [00000000] code: syz.4.282/6316
caller is nf_dup_ipv4+0x651/0x8f0 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_dup_ipv4.c:87
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6316 Comm: syz.4.282 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7-syzkaller-00104-g7052622fccb1 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
check_preemption_disabled+0x10e/0x120 lib/smp_processor_id.c:49
nf_dup_ipv4+0x651/0x8f0 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_dup_ipv4.c:87
nft_dup_ipv4_eval+0x1db/0x300 net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_dup_ipv4.c:30
expr_call_ops_eval net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:240 [inline]
nft_do_chain+0x4ad/0x1da0 net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:288
nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x202/0x320 net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c:23
nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline]
nf_hook_slow+0xc3/0x220 net/netfilter/core.c:626
nf_hook+0x2c4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:269
NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:302 [inline]
ip_output+0x185/0x230 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:433
ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
ip_send_skb+0x74/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:1495
udp_send_skb+0xacf/0x1650 net/ipv4/udp.c:981
udp_sendmsg+0x1c21/0x2a60 net/ipv4/udp.c:1269
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
__sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
__do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f4ce4f7def9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f4ce5d4a038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f4ce5135f80 RCX: 00007f4ce4f7def9
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020005d40 RDI: 0000000000000006
RBP: 00007f4ce4ff0b76 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f4ce5135f80 R15: 00007ffd4cbc6d68
</TASK> |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: Require FMODE_WRITE for atomic write ioctls
The F2FS ioctls for starting and committing atomic writes check for
inode_owner_or_capable(), but this does not give LSMs like SELinux or
Landlock an opportunity to deny the write access - if the caller's FSUID
matches the inode's UID, inode_owner_or_capable() immediately returns true.
There are scenarios where LSMs want to deny a process the ability to write
particular files, even files that the FSUID of the process owns; but this
can currently partially be bypassed using atomic write ioctls in two ways:
- F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_REPLACE + F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE can
truncate an inode to size 0
- F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE + F2FS_IOC_ABORT_ATOMIC_WRITE can revert
changes another process concurrently made to a file
Fix it by requiring FMODE_WRITE for these operations, just like for
F2FS_IOC_MOVE_RANGE. Since any legitimate caller should only be using these
ioctls when intending to write into the file, that seems unlikely to break
anything. |
| This issue was addressed by removing the vulnerable code. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.7.5, macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5. An app may be able to modify protected parts of the file system. |
| A library injection issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.7.5, macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5. Apps that appear to use App Sandbox may be able to launch without restrictions. |
| A permissions issue was addressed by removing vulnerable code and adding additional checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.7.5, macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5. An app may be able to access protected user data. |
| This issue was addressed with improved validation of symlinks. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.7.5, macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. |
