Total
521 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-24403 | 1 Midnightblue | 1 Tetra\ | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| The TETRA TA61 identity encryption function internally uses a 64-bit value derived exclusively from the SCK (Class 2 networks) or CCK (Class 3 networks). The structure of TA61 allows for efficient recovery of this 64-bit value, allowing an adversary to encrypt or decrypt arbitrary identities given only three known encrypted/unencrypted identity pairs. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24296 | 1 Mitsubishi | 40 Ae-200a, Ae-200a Firmware, Ae-200e and 37 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability in Air Conditioning System G-150AD Ver. 3.21 and prior, Air Conditioning System AG-150A-A Ver. 3.21 and prior, Air Conditioning System AG-150A-J Ver. 3.21 and prior, Air Conditioning System GB-50AD Ver. 3.21 and prior, Air Conditioning System GB-50ADA-A Ver. 3.21 and prior, Air Conditioning System GB-50ADA-J Ver. 3.21 and prior, Air Conditioning System EB-50GU-A Ver. 7.10 and prior, Air Conditioning System EB-50GU-J Ver. 7.10 and prior, Air Conditioning System AE-200J Ver. 7.97 and prior, Air Conditioning System AE-200A Ver. 7.97 and prior, Air Conditioning System AE-200E Ver. 7.97 and prior, Air Conditioning System AE-50J Ver. 7.97 and prior, Air Conditioning System AE-50A Ver. 7.97 and prior, Air Conditioning System AE-50E Ver. 7.97 and prior, Air Conditioning System EW-50J Ver. 7.97 and prior, Air Conditioning System EW-50A Ver. 7.97 and prior, Air Conditioning System EW-50E Ver. 7.97 and prior, Air Conditioning System TE-200A Ver. 7.97 and prior, Air Conditioning System TE-50A Ver. 7.97 and prior and Air Conditioning System TW-50A Ver. 7.97 and prior allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a disclosure of encrypted message of the air conditioning systems by sniffing encrypted communications. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23540 | 2 Auth0, Redhat | 2 Jsonwebtoken, Openshift Data Foundation | 2024-11-21 | 6.4 Medium |
| In versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library, lack of algorithm definition in the `jwt.verify()` function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the `none` algorithm for signature verification. Users are affected if you do not specify algorithms in the `jwt.verify()` function. This issue has been fixed, please update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the `jwt.verify()` method. There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the `none` algorithm. If you need 'none' algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in `jwt.verify()` options. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23539 | 2 Auth0, Redhat | 2 Jsonwebtoken, Openshift Data Foundation | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| Versions `<=8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library could be misconfigured so that legacy, insecure key types are used for signature verification. For example, DSA keys could be used with the RS256 algorithm. You are affected if you are using an algorithm and a key type other than a combination listed in the GitHub Security Advisory as unaffected. This issue has been fixed, please update to version 9.0.0. This version validates for asymmetric key type and algorithm combinations. Please refer to the above mentioned algorithm / key type combinations for the valid secure configuration. After updating to version 9.0.0, if you still intend to continue with signing or verifying tokens using invalid key type/algorithm value combinations, you’ll need to set the `allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes` option to `true` in the `sign()` and/or `verify()` functions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22564 | 1 Dell | 3 Emc Unity Operating Environment, Emc Unity Xt Operating Environment, Emc Unityvsa Operating Environment | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| Dell EMC Unity versions before 5.2.0.0.5.173 , use(es) broken cryptographic algorithm. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability by performing MitM attacks and let attackers obtain sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22559 | 1 Dell | 1 Emc Powerscale Onefs | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS, version 9.3.0, contains a use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm. An unprivileged network attacker could exploit this vulnerability, leading to the potential for information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22462 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Verify Governance, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 3.7 Low |
| IBM Security Verify Governance, Identity Manager virtual appliance component 10.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 225078. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22461 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Verify Governance, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Security Verify Governance, Identity Manager 10.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 225007. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22327 | 1 Ibm | 1 Urbancode Deploy | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.0.5, 7.1.0, 7.1.1, and 7.1.2 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 218859. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22313 | 1 Ibm | 1 Qradar Data Synchronization | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 Medium |
| IBM QRadar Data Synchronization App 1.0 through 3.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 217370. | ||||
| CVE-2022-21800 | 1 Airspan | 9 A5x, A5x Firmware, C5c and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| MMP: All versions prior to v1.0.3, PTP C-series: Device versions prior to v2.8.6.1, and PTMP C-series and A5x: Device versions prior to v2.5.4.1 uses the MD5 algorithm to hash the passwords before storing them but does not salt the hash. As a result, attackers may be able to crack the hashed passwords. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20805 | 1 Cisco | 1 Umbrella Secure Web Gateway | 2024-11-21 | 4.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the automatic decryption process in Cisco Umbrella Secure Web Gateway (SWG) could allow an authenticated, adjacent attacker to bypass the SSL decryption and content filtering policies on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to how the decryption function uses the TLS Sever Name Indication (SNI) extension of an HTTP request to discover the destination domain and determine if the request needs to be decrypted. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request over TLS from a client to an unknown or controlled URL. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to bypass the decryption process of Cisco Umbrella SWG and allow malicious content to be downloaded to a host on a protected network. There are workarounds that address this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2022-20117 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| In (TBD) of (TBD), there is a possible way to decrypt local data encrypted by the GSC due to improperly used crypto. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android kernelAndroid ID: A-217475903References: N/A | ||||
| CVE-2022-1434 | 2 Netapp, Openssl | 43 A250, A250 Firmware, A700s and 40 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first. Therefore, in such a case, only an OpenSSL 3.0 server would be impacted when talking to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 client. If both endpoints are OpenSSL 3.0 then the attacker could modify data being sent in both directions. In this case both clients and servers could be affected, regardless of the application protocol. Note that in the absence of an attacker this bug means that an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint communicating with a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will fail to complete the handshake when using this ciphersuite. The confidentiality of data is not impacted by this issue, i.e. an attacker cannot decrypt data that has been encrypted using this ciphersuite - they can only modify it. In order for this attack to work both endpoints must legitimately negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. This ciphersuite is not compiled by default in OpenSSL 3.0, and is not available within the default provider or the default ciphersuite list. This ciphersuite will never be used if TLSv1.3 has been negotiated. In order for an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to use this ciphersuite the following must have occurred: 1) OpenSSL must have been compiled with the (non-default) compile time option enable-weak-ssl-ciphers 2) OpenSSL must have had the legacy provider explicitly loaded (either through application code or via configuration) 3) The ciphersuite must have been explicitly added to the ciphersuite list 4) The libssl security level must have been set to 0 (default is 1) 5) A version of SSL/TLS below TLSv1.3 must have been negotiated 6) Both endpoints must negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite in preference to any others that both endpoints have in common Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). | ||||
| CVE-2022-1252 | 1 Sir | 1 Gnuboard | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm in GitHub repository gnuboard/gnuboard5 prior to and including 5.5.5. A vulnerability in gnuboard v5.5.5 and below uses weak encryption algorithms leading to sensitive information exposure. This allows an attacker to derive the email address of any user, including when the 'Let others see my information.' box is ticked off. Or to send emails to any email address, with full control of its contents | ||||
| CVE-2022-0377 | 1 Thimpress | 1 Learnpress | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| Users of the LearnPress WordPress plugin before 4.1.5 can upload an image as a profile avatar after the registration. After this process the user crops and saves the image. Then a "POST" request that contains user supplied name of the image is sent to the server for renaming and cropping of the image. As a result of this request, the name of the user-supplied image is changed with a MD5 value. This process can be conducted only when type of the image is JPG or PNG. An attacker can use this vulnerability in order to rename an arbitrary image file. By doing this, they could destroy the design of the web site. | ||||
| CVE-2021-4160 | 4 Debian, Openssl, Oracle and 1 more | 8 Debian Linux, Openssl, Enterprise Manager Ops Center and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring procedure. Many EC algorithms are affected, including some of the TLS 1.3 default curves. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because the pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely and include reusing private keys. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 on the 15th of December 2021. For the 1.0.2 release it is addressed in git commit 6fc1aaaf3 that is available to premium support customers only. It will be made available in 1.0.2zc when it is released. The issue only affects OpenSSL on MIPS platforms. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1m (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1l). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zc-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zb). | ||||
| CVE-2021-46900 | 1 Sympa | 1 Sympa | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Sympa before 6.2.62 relies on a cookie parameter for certain security objectives, but does not ensure that this parameter exists and has an unpredictable value. Specifically, the cookie parameter is both a salt for stored passwords and an XSS protection mechanism. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45696 | 1 Sha2 Project | 1 Sha2 | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in the sha2 crate 0.9.7 before 0.9.8 for Rust. Hashes of long messages may be incorrect when the AVX2-accelerated backend is used. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45512 | 1 Netgear | 42 D7000, D7000 Firmware, D8500 and 39 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.6 High |
| Certain NETGEAR devices are affected by weak cryptography. This affects D7000v2 before 1.0.0.62, D8500 before 1.0.3.50, EX3700 before 1.0.0.84, EX3800 before 1.0.0.84, EX6120 before 1.0.0.54, EX6130 before 1.0.0.36, EX7000 before 1.0.1.90, R6250 before 1.0.4.42, R6400v2 before 1.0.4.98, R6700v3 before 1.0.4.98, R6900P before 1.3.2.124, R7000 before 1.0.11.106, R7000P before 1.3.2.124, R7100LG before 1.0.0.56, R7900 before 1.0.4.26, R8000 before 1.0.4.58, R8300 before 1.0.2.134, R8500 before 1.0.2.134, RS400 before 1.5.0.48, WNR3500Lv2 before 1.2.0.62, and XR300 before 1.0.3.50. | ||||