| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 17.2 prior to 17.3.7, starting from 17.4 prior to 17.4.4 and starting from 17.5 prior to 17.5.2, which could have allowed an attacker gaining full API access as the victim via the Device OAuth flow. |
| A Cross Window Forgery vulnerability exists within GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 16.3 prior to 16.11.5, 17.0 prior to 17.0.3, and 17.1 prior to 17.1.1. This condition allows for an attacker to abuse the OAuth authentication flow via a crafted payload. |
| A clickjacking vulnerability in the HCL BigFix OSD Bare Metal Server version 311.12 or lower allows attacker to use transparent or opaque layers to trick a user into clicking on a button or link on another page to perform a redirect to an attacker-controlled domain.
|
| In hasInputInfo of Layer.cpp, there is a possible bypass of user interaction requirements due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android-13Android ID: A-194480991 |
| A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-frame scripting (XFS) attack against the user of the web UI of an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient protections for HTML inline frames (iframes) by the web UI of the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the affected UI to navigate to an attacker-controlled web page that contains a malicious HTML iframe. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct click-jacking or other client-side browser attacks on the affected system. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg19761. |
| Telegram v9.6.3 on iOS allows attackers to hide critical information on the User Interface via calling the function SFSafariViewController. |
| A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco HyperFlex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to affect the integrity of a device via a clickjacking attack. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of iFrame data in HTTP requests that are sent to an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets with malicious iFrame data. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform a clickjacking attack where the user is tricked into clicking a malicious link. |
| Inappropriate implementation in Compositing in Google Chrome prior to 119.0.6045.105 allowed a remote attacker to potentially spoof security UI via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| A vulnerability in the web-based interface of Cisco HyperFlex Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute a cross-frame scripting (XFS) attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient HTML iframe protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by directing a user to an attacker-controlled web page that contains a malicious HTML iframe. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct clickjacking or other clientside browser attacks. |
| Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to 3.2.5 and 3.3.0.beta5, the vulnerability allows an attacker to inject iframes from any domain, bypassing the intended restrictions enforced by the allowed_iframes setting. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.2.5 and 3.3.0.beta5. |
| HCL DRYiCE AEX is impacted by a lack of clickjacking protection in the AEX web application. An attacker can use multiple transparent or opaque layers to trick a user into clicking on a button or link on another page than the one intended. |
| A clickjacking vulnerability exists in zenml-io/zenml versions up to and including 0.55.5 due to the application's failure to set appropriate X-Frame-Options or Content-Security-Policy HTTP headers. This vulnerability allows an attacker to embed the application UI within an iframe on a malicious page, potentially leading to unauthorized actions by tricking users into interacting with the interface under the attacker's control. The issue was addressed in version 0.56.3. |
| A clickjacking vulnerability has been identified in OnCell G3150A-LTE Series firmware versions v1.3 and prior. This vulnerability is caused by incorrectly restricts frame objects, which can lead to user confusion about which interface the user is interacting with. This vulnerability may lead the attacker to trick the user into interacting with the application.
|
| Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames in RDT400 in SICK APU allows an unprivileged remote attacker to potentially reveal sensitive information via tricking a user into
clicking on an actionable item using an iframe.
|
| In Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security (RHACS), it was found that some security related HTTP headers were missing, allowing an attacker to exploit this with a clickjacking attack. An attacker could exploit this by convincing a valid RHACS user to visit an attacker-controlled web page, that deceptively points to valid RHACS endpoints, hijacking the user's account permissions to perform other actions. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in ioLogik 4000 Series (ioLogik E4200) firmware versions v1.6 and prior, potentially exposing users to security risks. This vulnerability may allow attackers to trick users into interacting with malicious content, leading to unintended actions or unauthorized data disclosures. |
| Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames vulnerability in Automattic Jetpack allows Clickjacking.This issue affects Jetpack: from n/a before 12.7.
|
| An issue in Yamcs 5.8.6 allows attackers to send aribitrary telelcommands in a Command Stack via Clickjacking. |
| Sametime is impacted by lack of clickjacking protection in Outlook add-in. The application is not implementing appropriate protections in order to protect users from clickjacking attacks.
|
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 6.1 and 6.2 does not restrict or incorrectly restricts frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain, which can lead to user confusion about which interface the user is interacting with. IBM X-Force ID: 265508. |
