| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| jose v6.0.10 was discovered to contain weak encryption. NOTE: this is disputed by a third party because the claim of "do not meet recommended security standards" does not reflect guidance in a final publication. |
| Snowflake JDBC driver versions >= 3.2.6 and <= 3.19.1 have an Incorrect Security Setting that can result in data being uploaded to an encrypted stage without the additional layer of protection provided by client side encryption. |
| An issue in Open Quantum Safe liboqs v.10.0 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the crypto_sign_signature parameter in the /pqcrystals-dilithium-standard_ml-dsa-44-ipd_avx2/sign.c component. |
| IBM MQ Container 3.0.0, 3.0.1, 3.1.0 through 3.1.3 CD, 2.0.0 LTS through 2.0.22 LTS and 2.4.0 through 2.4.8, 2.3.0 through 2.3.3, 2.2.0 through 2.2.2 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. |
| IBM Storage Protect for Virtual Environments: Data Protection for VMware and Storage Protect Backup-Archive Client 8.1.0.0 through 8.1.23.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. |
| IBM Cognos Analytics Mobile (iOS) 1.1.0 through 1.1.22 could allow malicious actors to view and modify information coming to and from the application which could then be used to access confidential information on the device or network by using a the deprecated or misconfigured AFNetworking library at runtime. |
| jwt v5.4.3 was discovered to contain weak encryption. NOTE: this issue has been disputed on the basis that key lengths are expected to be set by an application, not by this library. This dispute is subject to review under CNA rules 4.1.4, 4.1.14, and other rules; the dispute tagging is not meant to recommend an outcome for this CVE Record. |
| php-jwt v6.11.0 was discovered to contain weak encryption. NOTE: this issue has been disputed on the basis that key lengths are expected to be set by an application, not by this library. This dispute is subject to review under CNA rules 4.1.4, 4.1.14, and other rules; the dispute tagging is not meant to recommend an outcome for this CVE Record. |
| poco v1.14.1-release was discovered to contain weak encryption. NOTE: this issue has been disputed on the basis that key lengths are expected to be set by an application, not by this library. This dispute is subject to review under CNA rules 4.1.4, 4.1.14, and other rules; the dispute tagging is not meant to recommend an outcome for this CVE Record. |
| IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.3.1, 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.0, and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. |
| IBM Aspera Console 3.4.0 through 3.4.4
uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. |
| The Fedora Secure Boot CA certificate shipped with shim in Fedora was expired which could lead to old or invalid signed boot components being loaded. |
| IBM DevOps Velocity 5.0.0 and IBM UrbanCode Velocity 4.0.0 through 4.0. 25 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. |
| IBM Security Guardium Data Encryption (GDE) 3.0.0.2 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 158577. |
| ruby-jwt v3.0.0.beta1 was discovered to contain weak encryption. NOTE: the Supplier's perspective is "keysize is not something that is enforced by this library. Currently more recent versions of OpenSSL are enforcing some key sizes and those restrictions apply to the users of this gem also." |
| Softing Secure Integration Server Hardcoded Cryptographic Key Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Softing Secure Integration Server. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed.
The specific flaw exists within libopcuaclient.so. The issue results from hardcoding crytographic keys within the product. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to disclose stored credentials, leading to further compromise. Was ZDI-CAN-20610. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM i801 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM i802 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM i803 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM M2100 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM M2200 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM M969 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RMC30 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RP110 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS1600 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS1600F (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS1600T (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS400 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS401 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416P (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RS8000 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS8000A (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS8000H (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS8000T (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900GP (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900L (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900W (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS910 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS910L (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS910W (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS920L (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS920W (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS930L (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS930W (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS940G (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS969 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2200 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.7.0). The SSH server on affected devices is configured to offer weak ciphers by default.
This could allow an unauthorized attacker in a man-in-the-middle position to read and modify any data passed over the connection between legitimate clients and the affected device. |
| Affected devices use a hardcoded key to obfuscate the configuration backup that an administrator can export from the device. This could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges or an attacker that obtains a configuration backup to extract configuration information from the exported file. |
| A low privileged local attacker can abuse the affected service by using a hardcoded cryptographic key. |
| The File Away plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the ajax() function in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.9.0.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers, leveraging the use of a reversible weak algorithm, to read the contents of arbitrary files on the server, which can contain sensitive information. |
