Filtered by vendor Pulsesecure
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Pulse Policy Secure
Subscriptions
Total
32 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-11477 | 6 Canonical, F5, Ivanti and 3 more | 29 Ubuntu Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 26 more | 2024-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Acknowledgments (SACKs). A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit 3b4929f65b0d8249f19a50245cd88ed1a2f78cff. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11478 | 6 Canonical, F5, Ivanti and 3 more | 29 Ubuntu Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 26 more | 2024-09-16 | N/A |
| Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP retransmission queue implementation in tcp_fragment in the Linux kernel could be fragmented when handling certain TCP Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) sequences. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit f070ef2ac66716357066b683fb0baf55f8191a2e. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20809 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-09-16 | N/A |
| A crafted message can cause the web server to crash with Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.3RX before 8.3R5 and Pulse Policy Secure 5.4RX before 5.4R5. This is not applicable to PCS 8.1RX. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20810 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-09-16 | N/A |
| Session data between cluster nodes during cluster synchronization is not properly encrypted in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.3RX before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.4RX before 5.4R2. This is not applicable to PCS 8.1RX, PPS 5.2RX, or stand-alone devices. | ||||
| CVE-2017-11455 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| diag.cgi in Pulse Connect Secure 8.2R1 through 8.2R5, 8.1R1 through 8.1R10 and Pulse Policy Secure 5.3R1 through 5.3R5, 5.2R1 through 5.2R8, and 5.1R1 through 5.1R10 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests to start tcpdump, related to the lack of anti-CSRF tokens. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20814 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| An XSS issue was found with Psaldownload.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.3R2 before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.4RX before 5.4R2. This is not applicable to PCS 8.1RX or PPS 5.2RX. | ||||
| CVE-2018-14366 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| download.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure 8.1RX before 8.1R13 and 8.3RX before 8.3R4 and Pulse Policy Secure through 5.2RX before 5.2R10 and 5.4RX before 5.4R4 have an Open Redirect Vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2018-6320 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| A vulnerability has been discovered in login.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.1RX before 8.1R12 and 8.3RX before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.2RX before 5.2R9 and 5.4RX before 5.4R2 wherein an http(s) Host header received from the browser is trusted without validation. | ||||
| CVE-2018-5299 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-08-05 | N/A |
| A stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability exists in the web server in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 8.3R4 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 5.4R4, leading to memory corruption and possibly remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11543 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-08-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| XSS exists in the admin web console in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, and 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11542 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-08-04 | 7.2 High |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, 5.3RX before 5.3R12.1, 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1, and 5.1RX before 5.1R15.1, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can send a specially crafted message resulting in a stack buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11539 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-08-04 | 7.2 High |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4, 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1, 8.2RX before 8.2R12.1, and 8.1RX before 8.1R15.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2, 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, 5.3RX before 5.3R12.1, 5.2RX before 5.2R12.1, and 5.1RX before 5.1R15.1, the admin web interface allows an authenticated attacker to inject and execute commands. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11540 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-08-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.4 and 8.3RX before 8.3R7.1 and Pulse Policy Secure version 9.0RX before 9.0R3.2 and 5.4RX before 5.4R7.1, an unauthenticated, remote attacker can conduct a session hijacking attack. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11509 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-08-04 | 8.8 High |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 8.1R15.1, 8.2 before 8.2R12.1, 8.3 before 8.3R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.4 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 5.1R15.1, 5.2 before 5.2R12.1, 5.3 before 5.3R15.1, 5.4 before 5.4R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.2, an authenticated attacker (via the admin web interface) can exploit Incorrect Access Control to execute arbitrary code on the appliance. | ||||
| CVE-2020-15352 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-08-04 | 7.2 High |
| An XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 9.1R9 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 9.1R9 allows remote authenticated admins to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD in an XML request. | ||||
| CVE-2020-12880 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-08-04 | 5.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) and Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) Virtual Appliance before 9.1R8. By manipulating a certain kernel boot parameter, it can be tricked into dropping into a root shell in a pre-install phase where the entire source code of the appliance is available and can be retrieved. (The source code is otherwise inaccessible because the appliance has its hard disks encrypted, and no root shell is available during normal operation.) | ||||
| CVE-2020-11582 | 4 Apple, Linux, Oracle and 1 more | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, Solaris and 2 more | 2024-08-04 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) through 2020-04-06. The applet in tncc.jar, executed on macOS, Linux, and Solaris clients when a Host Checker policy is enforced, launches a TCP server that accepts local connections on a random port. This can be reached by local HTTP clients, because up to 25 invalid lines are ignored, and because DNS rebinding can occur. (This server accepts, for example, a setcookie command that might be relevant to CVE-2020-11581 exploitation.) | ||||
| CVE-2020-11581 | 4 Apple, Linux, Oracle and 1 more | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, Solaris and 2 more | 2024-08-04 | 8.1 High |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) through 2020-04-06. The applet in tncc.jar, executed on macOS, Linux, and Solaris clients when a Host Checker policy is enforced, allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to perform OS command injection attacks (against a client) via shell metacharacters to the doCustomRemediateInstructions method, because Runtime.getRuntime().exec() is used. | ||||
| CVE-2020-11580 | 4 Apple, Linux, Oracle and 1 more | 5 Macos, Linux Kernel, Solaris and 2 more | 2024-08-04 | 9.1 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) through 2020-04-06. The applet in tncc.jar, executed on macOS, Linux, and Solaris clients when a Host Checker policy is enforced, accepts an arbitrary SSL certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2020-8261 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 4 Connect Secure, Policy Secure, Pulse Connect Secure and 1 more | 2024-08-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the Pulse Connect Secure / Pulse Policy Secure < 9.1R9 is vulnerable to arbitrary cookie injection. | ||||