Filtered by vendor Alibaba Subscriptions
Total 12 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2020-21699 1 Alibaba 1 Tengine 2024-10-03 7.5 High
The web server Tengine 2.2.2 developed in the Nginx version from 0.5.6 thru 1.13.2 is vulnerable to an integer overflow vulnerability in the nginx range filter module, resulting in the leakage of potentially sensitive information triggered by specially crafted requests.
CVE-2017-18349 2 Alibaba, Pippo 2 Fastjson, Pippo 2024-09-17 N/A
parseObject in Fastjson before 1.2.25, as used in FastjsonEngine in Pippo 1.11.0 and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted JSON request, as demonstrated by a crafted rmi:// URI in the dataSourceName field of HTTP POST data to the Pippo /json URI, which is mishandled in AjaxApplication.java.
CVE-2022-25845 3 Alibaba, Oracle, Redhat 3 Fastjson, Communications Cloud Native Core Unified Data Repository, Jboss Fuse 2024-09-16 8.1 High
The package com.alibaba:fastjson before 1.2.83 are vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data by bypassing the default autoType shutdown restrictions, which is possible under certain conditions. Exploiting this vulnerability allows attacking remote servers. Workaround: If upgrading is not possible, you can enable [safeMode](https://github.com/alibaba/fastjson/wiki/fastjson_safemode).
CVE-2024-44067 1 Alibaba 2 T-head Xuantie C910, T-head Xuantie C920 2024-08-20 8.4 High
The T-Head XuanTie C910 CPU in the TH1520 SoC and the T-Head XuanTie C920 CPU in the SOPHON SG2042 have instructions that allow unprivileged attackers to write to arbitrary physical memory locations, aka GhostWrite.
CVE-2007-0827 1 Alibaba 1 Alipay Activex Control 2024-08-07 N/A
The Alibaba Alipay PTA Module ActiveX control (PTA.DLL) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a JavaScript function that invokes the Remove method with an invalid index argument, which is used as an offset for a function call.
CVE-2014-5976 1 Alibaba 1 Alibaba 2024-08-06 N/A
The alibaba (aka com.alibaba.wireless) application 4.1.0.0 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
CVE-2020-19676 1 Alibaba 1 Nacos 2024-08-04 5.3 Medium
Nacos 1.1.4 is affected by: Incorrect Access Control. An environment can be set up locally to get the service details interface. Then other Nacos service names can be accessed through the service list interface. Service details can then be accessed when not logged in. (detail:https://github.com/alibaba/nacos/issues/2284)
CVE-2021-44667 1 Alibaba 1 Nacos 2024-08-04 6.1 Medium
A Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Nacos 2.0.3 in auth/users via the (1) pageSize and (2) pageNo parameters.
CVE-2021-43116 1 Alibaba 1 Nacos 2024-08-04 8.8 High
An Access Control vulnerability exists in Nacos 2.0.3 in the access prompt page; enter username and password, click on login to capture packets and then change the returned package, which lets a malicious user login.
CVE-2021-33800 1 Alibaba 1 Druid 2024-08-03 7.5 High
In Druid 1.2.3, visiting the path with parameter in a certain function can lead to directory traversal.
CVE-2021-29441 1 Alibaba 1 Nacos 2024-08-03 8.6 High
Nacos is a platform designed for dynamic service discovery and configuration and service management. In Nacos before version 1.4.1, when configured to use authentication (-Dnacos.core.auth.enabled=true) Nacos uses the AuthFilter servlet filter to enforce authentication. This filter has a backdoor that enables Nacos servers to bypass this filter and therefore skip authentication checks. This mechanism relies on the user-agent HTTP header so it can be easily spoofed. This issue may allow any user to carry out any administrative tasks on the Nacos server.
CVE-2021-29442 1 Alibaba 1 Nacos 2024-08-03 8.6 High
Nacos is a platform designed for dynamic service discovery and configuration and service management. In Nacos before version 1.4.1, the ConfigOpsController lets the user perform management operations like querying the database or even wiping it out. While the /data/remove endpoint is properly protected with the @Secured annotation, the /derby endpoint is not protected and can be openly accessed by unauthenticated users. These endpoints are only valid when using embedded storage (derby DB) so this issue should not affect those installations using external storage (e.g. mysql)