Filtered by vendor Checkmk
Subscriptions
Total
54 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-6052 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-09-16 | 6.5 Medium |
| Stored XSS in Checkmk before versions 2.3.0p8, 2.2.0p29, 2.1.0p45, and 2.0.0 (EOL) allows users to execute arbitrary scripts by injecting HTML elements | ||||
| CVE-2024-6572 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-09-09 | 7.4 High |
| Improper host key checking in active check 'Check SFTP Service' and special agent 'VNX quotas and filesystem' in Checkmk before Checkmk 2.3.0p15, 2.2.0p33, 2.1.0p48 and 2.0.0 (EOL) allows man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept traffic | ||||
| CVE-2024-38858 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-09-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| Improper neutralization of input in Checkmk before version 2.3.0p14 allows attackers to inject and run malicious scripts in the Robotmk logs view. | ||||
| CVE-2023-22359 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-08-28 | 4.3 Medium |
| User enumeration in Checkmk <=2.2.0p4 allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate usernames. | ||||
| CVE-2023-23549 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-08-28 | 2.7 Low |
| Improper Input Validation in Checkmk <2.2.0p15, <2.1.0p37, <=2.0.0p39 allows priviledged attackers to cause partial denial of service of the UI via too long hostnames. | ||||
| CVE-2023-31209 | 2 Checkmk, Tribe29 | 2 Checkmk, Checkmk | 2024-08-28 | 8.8 High |
| Improper neutralization of active check command arguments in Checkmk < 2.1.0p32, < 2.0.0p38, < 2.2.0p4 leads to arbitrary command execution for authenticated users. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6735 | 2 Checkmk, Tribe29 | 2 Checkmk, Checkmk | 2024-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| Privilege escalation in mk_tsm agent plugin in Checkmk before 2.2.0p18, 2.1.0p38 and 2.0.0p39 allows local user to escalate privileges | ||||
| CVE-2023-31211 | 2 Checkmk, Tribe29 | 2 Checkmk, Checkmk | 2024-08-26 | 8.8 High |
| Insufficient authentication flow in Checkmk before 2.2.0p18, 2.1.0p38 and 2.0.0p39 allows attacker to use locked credentials | ||||
| CVE-2024-28829 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-08-21 | N/A |
| Least privilege violation and reliance on untrusted inputs in the mk_informix Checkmk agent plugin before Checkmk 2.3.0p12, 2.2.0p32, 2.1.0p47 and 2.0.0 (EOL) allows local users to escalate privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6163 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-08-20 | 5.3 Medium |
| Certain http endpoints of Checkmk in Checkmk < 2.3.0p10 < 2.2.0p31, < 2.1.0p46, <= 2.0.0p39 allows remote attacker to bypass authentication and access data | ||||
| CVE-2024-5741 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-08-16 | 6.5 Medium |
| Stored XSS in inventory tree rendering in Checkmk before 2.3.0p7, 2.2.0p28, 2.1.0p45 and 2.0.0 (EOL) | ||||
| CVE-2024-6542 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-08-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper neutralization of livestatus command delimiters in mknotifyd in Checkmk <= 2.0.0p39, < 2.1.0p47, < 2.2.0p32 and < 2.3.0p11 allows arbitrary livestatus command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28828 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-08-07 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-Site request forgery in Checkmk < 2.3.0p8, < 2.2.0p29, < 2.1.0p45, and <= 2.0.0p39 (EOL) could lead to 1-click compromize of the site. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14955 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-08-05 | 5.9 Medium |
| Check_MK before 1.2.8p26 mishandles certain errors within the failed-login save feature because of a race condition, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive user information by reading a GUI crash report. | ||||
| CVE-2020-28919 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-08-04 | 5.4 Medium |
| A stored cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Checkmk 1.6.0x prior to 1.6.0p19 allows an authenticated remote attacker to inject arbitrary JavaScript via a javascript: URL in a view title. | ||||
| CVE-2020-24908 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-08-04 | 7.8 High |
| Checkmk before 1.6.0p17 allows local users to obtain SYSTEM privileges via a Trojan horse shell script in the %PROGRAMDATA%\checkmk\agent\local directory. | ||||
| CVE-2021-40905 | 2 Checkmk, Tribe29 | 2 Checkmk, Checkmk | 2024-08-04 | 8.8 High |
| The web management console of CheckMK Enterprise Edition (versions 1.5.0 to 2.0.0p9) does not properly sanitise the uploading of ".mkp" files, which are Extension Packages, making remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires access to the web management interface, either with valid credentials or with a hijacked session of a user with administrator role. NOTE: the vendor states that this is the intended behavior: admins are supposed to be able to execute code in this manner | ||||
| CVE-2021-40904 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-08-04 | 8.8 High |
| The web management console of CheckMK Raw Edition (versions 1.5.0 to 1.6.0) allows a misconfiguration of the web-app Dokuwiki (installed by default), which allows embedded php code. As a result, remote code execution is achieved. Successful exploitation requires access to the web management interface, either with valid credentials or with a hijacked session by a user with the role of administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2021-40906 | 2 Checkmk, Tribe29 | 2 Checkmk, Checkmk | 2024-08-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| CheckMK Raw Edition software (versions 1.5.0 to 1.6.0) does not sanitise the input of a web service parameter that is in an unauthenticated zone. This Reflected XSS allows an attacker to open a backdoor on the device with HTML content and interpreted by the browser (such as JavaScript or other client-side scripts) or to steal the session cookies of a user who has previously authenticated via a man in the middle. Successful exploitation requires access to the web service resource without authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2021-36563 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-08-04 | 5.4 Medium |
| The CheckMK management web console (versions 1.5.0 to 2.0.0) does not sanitise user input in various parameters of the WATO module. This allows an attacker to open a backdoor on the device with HTML content and interpreted by the browser (such as JavaScript or other client-side scripts), the XSS payload will be triggered when the user accesses some specific sections of the application. In the same sense a very dangerous potential way would be when an attacker who has the monitor role (not administrator) manages to get a stored XSS to steal the secretAutomation (for the use of the API in administrator mode) and thus be able to create another administrator user who has high privileges on the CheckMK monitoring web console. Another way is that persistent XSS allows an attacker to modify the displayed content or change the victim's information. Successful exploitation requires access to the web management interface, either with valid credentials or with a hijacked session. | ||||