Filtered by vendor Python
Subscriptions
Total
226 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-4032 | 2 Python, Redhat | 3 Cpython, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2024-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| The “ipaddress” module contained incorrect information about whether certain IPv4 and IPv6 addresses were designated as “globally reachable” or “private”. This affected the is_private and is_global properties of the ipaddress.IPv4Address, ipaddress.IPv4Network, ipaddress.IPv6Address, and ipaddress.IPv6Network classes, where values wouldn’t be returned in accordance with the latest information from the IANA Special-Purpose Address Registries. CPython 3.12.4 and 3.13.0a6 contain updated information from these registries and thus have the intended behavior. | ||||
| CVE-2012-4571 | 1 Python | 1 Keyring | 2024-09-17 | N/A |
| Python Keyring 0.9.1 does not securely initialize the cipher when encrypting passwords for CryptedFileKeyring files, which makes it easier for local users to obtain passwords via a brute-force attack. | ||||
| CVE-2014-3007 | 2 Python, Pythonware | 2 Pillow, Python Imaging Library | 2024-09-17 | N/A |
| Python Image Library (PIL) 1.1.7 and earlier and Pillow 2.3 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in unspecified vectors related to CVE-2014-1932, possibly JpegImagePlugin.py. | ||||
| CVE-2018-1000117 | 2 Microsoft, Python | 2 Windows, Python | 2024-09-17 | 6.7 Medium |
| Python Software Foundation CPython version From 3.2 until 3.6.4 on Windows contains a Buffer Overflow vulnerability in os.symlink() function on Windows that can result in Arbitrary code execution, likely escalation of privilege. This attack appears to be exploitable via a python script that creates a symlink with an attacker controlled name or location. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 3.7.0 and 3.6.5. | ||||
| CVE-2013-1633 | 1 Python | 1 Setuptools | 2024-09-16 | N/A |
| easy_install in setuptools before 0.7 uses HTTP to retrieve packages from the PyPI repository, and does not perform integrity checks on package contents, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted response to the default use of the product. | ||||
| CVE-2021-23437 | 2 Fedoraproject, Python | 2 Fedora, Pillow | 2024-09-16 | 7.5 High |
| The package pillow 5.2.0 and before 8.3.2 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the getrgb function. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25091 | 2 Python, Redhat | 2 Urllib3, Enterprise Linux | 2024-09-16 | 6.1 Medium |
| urllib3 before 1.24.2 does not remove the authorization HTTP header when following a cross-origin redirect (i.e., a redirect that differs in host, port, or scheme). This can allow for credentials in the authorization header to be exposed to unintended hosts or transmitted in cleartext. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-20060 (which was case-sensitive). | ||||
| CVE-2021-23336 | 7 Debian, Djangoproject, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 14 Debian Linux, Django, Fedora and 11 more | 2024-09-16 | 5.9 Medium |
| The package python/cpython from 0 and before 3.6.13, from 3.7.0 and before 3.7.10, from 3.8.0 and before 3.8.8, from 3.9.0 and before 3.9.2 are vulnerable to Web Cache Poisoning via urllib.parse.parse_qsl and urllib.parse.parse_qs by using a vector called parameter cloaking. When the attacker can separate query parameters using a semicolon (;), they can cause a difference in the interpretation of the request between the proxy (running with default configuration) and the server. This can result in malicious requests being cached as completely safe ones, as the proxy would usually not see the semicolon as a separator, and therefore would not include it in a cache key of an unkeyed parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45803 | 3 Fedoraproject, Python, Redhat | 8 Fedora, Urllib3, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2024-09-13 | 4.2 Medium |
| urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. urllib3 previously wouldn't remove the HTTP request body when an HTTP redirect response using status 301, 302, or 303 after the request had its method changed from one that could accept a request body (like `POST`) to `GET` as is required by HTTP RFCs. Although this behavior is not specified in the section for redirects, it can be inferred by piecing together information from different sections and we have observed the behavior in other major HTTP client implementations like curl and web browsers. Because the vulnerability requires a previously trusted service to become compromised in order to have an impact on confidentiality we believe the exploitability of this vulnerability is low. Additionally, many users aren't putting sensitive data in HTTP request bodies, if this is the case then this vulnerability isn't exploitable. Both of the following conditions must be true to be affected by this vulnerability: 1. Using urllib3 and submitting sensitive information in the HTTP request body (such as form data or JSON) and 2. The origin service is compromised and starts redirecting using 301, 302, or 303 to a malicious peer or the redirected-to service becomes compromised. This issue has been addressed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7 and users are advised to update to resolve this issue. Users unable to update should disable redirects for services that aren't expecting to respond with redirects with `redirects=False` and disable automatic redirects with `redirects=False` and handle 301, 302, and 303 redirects manually by stripping the HTTP request body. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7592 | 1 Python | 2 Cpython, Python | 2024-09-09 | 7.5 High |
| There is a LOW severity vulnerability affecting CPython, specifically the 'http.cookies' standard library module. When parsing cookies that contained backslashes for quoted characters in the cookie value, the parser would use an algorithm with quadratic complexity, resulting in excess CPU resources being used while parsing the value. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6232 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2024-09-07 | 7.5 High |
| There is a MEDIUM severity vulnerability affecting CPython. Regular expressions that allowed excessive backtracking during tarfile.TarFile header parsing are vulnerable to ReDoS via specifically-crafted tar archives. | ||||
| CVE-2023-43804 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Python and 1 more | 12 Debian Linux, Fedora, Urllib3 and 9 more | 2024-08-19 | 5.9 Medium |
| urllib3 is a user-friendly HTTP client library for Python. urllib3 doesn't treat the `Cookie` HTTP header special or provide any helpers for managing cookies over HTTP, that is the responsibility of the user. However, it is possible for a user to specify a `Cookie` header and unknowingly leak information via HTTP redirects to a different origin if that user doesn't disable redirects explicitly. This issue has been patched in urllib3 version 1.26.17 or 2.0.5. | ||||
| CVE-2002-1119 | 2 Python, Redhat | 3 Python, Enterprise Linux, Linux | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
| os._execvpe from os.py in Python 2.2.1 and earlier creates temporary files with predictable names, which could allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a symlink attack. | ||||
| CVE-2004-0150 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2024-08-08 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the getaddrinfo function in Python 2.2 before 2.2.2, when IPv6 support is disabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an IPv6 address that is obtained using DNS. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0089 | 2 Python, Redhat | 2 Python, Enterprise Linux | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
| The SimpleXMLRPCServer library module in Python 2.2, 2.3 before 2.3.5, and 2.4, when used by XML-RPC servers that use the register_instance method to register an object without a _dispatch method, allows remote attackers to read or modify globals of the associated module, and possibly execute arbitrary code, via dotted attributes. | ||||
| CVE-2006-4980 | 2 Python, Redhat | 3 Python, Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the repr function in Python 2.3 through 2.6 before 20060822 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted wide character UTF-32/UCS-4 strings to certain scripts. | ||||
| CVE-2006-1542 | 2 Python, Redhat | 2 Python, Network Satellite | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Python 2.4.2 and earlier, running on Linux 2.6.12.5 under gcc 4.0.3 with libc 2.3.5, allows local users to cause a "stack overflow," and possibly gain privileges, by running a script from a current working directory that has a long name, related to the realpath function. NOTE: this might not be a vulnerability. However, the fact that it appears in a programming language interpreter could mean that some applications are affected, although attack scenarios might be limited because the attacker might already need to cross privilege boundaries to cause an exploitable program to be placed in a directory with a long name; or, depending on the method that Python uses to determine the current working directory, setuid applications might be affected. | ||||
| CVE-2007-4965 | 2 Python, Redhat | 3 Python, Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
| Multiple integer overflows in the imageop module in Python 2.5.1 and earlier allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly obtain sensitive information (memory contents) via crafted arguments to (1) the tovideo method, and unspecified other vectors related to (2) imageop.c, (3) rbgimgmodule.c, and other files, which trigger heap-based buffer overflows. | ||||
| CVE-2007-4559 | 2 Python, Redhat | 4 Python, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus and 1 more | 2024-08-07 | 5.5 Medium |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the (1) extract and (2) extractall functions in the tarfile module in Python allows user-assisted remote attackers to overwrite arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) sequence in filenames in a TAR archive, a related issue to CVE-2001-1267. | ||||
| CVE-2007-2052 | 2 Python, Redhat | 3 Python, Enterprise Linux, Network Satellite | 2024-08-07 | N/A |
| Off-by-one error in the PyLocale_strxfrm function in Modules/_localemodule.c for Python 2.4 and 2.5 causes an incorrect buffer size to be used for the strxfrm function, which allows context-dependent attackers to read portions of memory via unknown manipulations that trigger a buffer over-read due to missing null termination. | ||||