The WP SinoType plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the sinotype_config function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify typography settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Fixes

Solution

No solution given by the vendor.


Workaround

No workaround given by the vendor.

History

Fri, 03 Oct 2025 14:15:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
Metrics ssvc

{'options': {'Automatable': 'no', 'Exploitation': 'none', 'Technical Impact': 'partial'}, 'version': '2.0.3'}


Fri, 03 Oct 2025 11:30:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
Description The WP SinoType plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the sinotype_config function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify typography settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Title WP SinoType <= 1.0 - Cross-Site Request Forgery
Weaknesses CWE-352
References
Metrics cvssV3_1

{'score': 4.3, 'vector': 'CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N'}


cve-icon MITRE

Status: PUBLISHED

Assigner: Wordfence

Published:

Updated: 2025-10-03T14:01:55.192Z

Reserved: 2025-08-28T19:46:35.987Z

Link: CVE-2025-9630

cve-icon Vulnrichment

Updated: 2025-10-03T14:01:48.545Z

cve-icon NVD

Status : Received

Published: 2025-10-03T12:15:48.743

Modified: 2025-10-03T12:15:48.743

Link: CVE-2025-9630

cve-icon Redhat

No data.

cve-icon OpenCVE Enrichment

No data.