Description
Contrast before 1.16.0 is susceptible to remote attestation relay attacks. Contrast accepted any TEE attestation report that verified correctly and contained the expected firmware patch levels and software measurements, regardless of which machine produced it, so attestation was not bound to specific, physically trusted hardware. An attacker who can both intercept network traffic between the CLI and the Coordinator (or between the Coordinator and an attested component) and forge reports or extract secrets from any single TEE machine under their physical control can relay such a report to impersonate a Contrast Coordinator or a Contrast workload, defeating identity verification in Contrast's attested TLS (aTLS).
Published: 2026-09-27
Score: 9.1 Critical
EPSS: < 1% Very Low
KEV: No
Impact: Remote Impersonation and Unauthorized Access via attestation relays
Action: Immediate Patch
AI Analysis

Impact

Contrast before version 1.16.0 accepts any signed TEE attestation report that verifies and contains the correct firmware and software measurements, but it does not bind that report to the physical hardware that produced it. This flaw allows an attacker to relay a valid attestation report from a compromised or physically controlled TEE, effectively masquerading as a trusted Contrast Coordinator or workload. By doing so the attacker can bypass Contrast’s attested TLS (aTLS) identity checks, enabling man‑in‑the‑middle attacks, credential theft, or potentially the execution of unauthorized code within the Contrast ecosystem. The weakness is a classic example of Improper Binding of Authentication Credentials to Device (CWE‑295).

Affected Systems

All installations of the edgelesssys Contrast product that use a version older than 1.16.0 are susceptible to this remote attestation relay attack. No specific patch releases are listed for earlier versions, but the vulnerability is mitigated by updating to any release that is version 1.16.0 or newer.

Risk and Exploitability

The CVSS base score of 9.1 indicates a high‑severity vulnerability; the EPSS score is not available, and it is not flagged in CISA’s KEV catalog. An attacker must first intercept network traffic between the Contrast CLI and the Coordinator or between the Coordinator and an attested component, and must also have a TEE device under their physical control to produce or capture a valid attestation report. Once these conditions are met, the attacker can relay the report to impersonate a trusted component, thereby breaking the authentication guarantees that aTLS provides. The exploitation pathway is therefore a combination of network interception and physical access to a TEE, which presents a significant threat to systems that rely on Contrast’s attestation for secure communications.

Generated by OpenCVE AI on September 27, 2026 at 03:22 UTC.

Remediation

No solution or workaround provided in the CVE record.

OpenCVE Recommended Actions

  • Upgrade Contrast to version 1.16.0 or later.
  • Ensure that network traffic between the CLI, Coordinator, and attested components is protected by additional isolation measures or encryption beyond the standard aTLS channel.
  • Monitor for anomalous attestation report patterns or unexpected changes in TLS handshake behavior that could indicate a relay attempt.

Generated by OpenCVE AI on September 27, 2026 at 03:22 UTC.

Tracking

Sign in to view the affected projects.

Advisories

No advisories yet.

History

Wed, 30 Sep 2026 16:30:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
Metrics ssvc

{'options': {'Automatable': 'no', 'Exploitation': 'none', 'Technical Impact': 'total'}, 'version': '2.0.3'}


Sun, 27 Sep 2026 12:15:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
First Time appeared Edgelesssys
Edgelesssys contrast
Vendors & Products Edgelesssys
Edgelesssys contrast

Sun, 27 Sep 2026 02:00:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
Description Contrast before 1.16.0 is susceptible to remote attestation relay attacks. Contrast accepted any TEE attestation report that verified correctly and contained the expected firmware patch levels and software measurements, regardless of which machine produced it, so attestation was not bound to specific, physically trusted hardware. An attacker who can both intercept network traffic between the CLI and the Coordinator (or between the Coordinator and an attested component) and forge reports or extract secrets from any single TEE machine under their physical control can relay such a report to impersonate a Contrast Coordinator or a Contrast workload, defeating identity verification in Contrast's attested TLS (aTLS).
Title Contrast before 1.16.0 Remote Attestation Relay Attack
Weaknesses CWE-295
References
Metrics cvssV3_1

{'score': 7.4, 'vector': 'CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N'}

cvssV4_0

{'score': 9.1, 'vector': 'CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N'}


Subscriptions

Edgelesssys Contrast
cve-icon MITRE

Status: PUBLISHED

Assigner: VulnCheck

Published:

Updated: 2026-09-30T15:16:05.311Z

Reserved: 2026-09-26T23:23:03.410Z

Link: CVE-2026-100835

cve-icon Vulnrichment

Updated: 2026-09-30T15:15:59.387Z

cve-icon NVD

Status : Deferred

Published: 2026-09-27T02:17:21.640

Modified: 2026-09-30T16:17:01.910

Link: CVE-2026-100835

cve-icon Redhat

No data.

cve-icon OpenCVE Enrichment

Updated: 2026-09-27T11:42:56Z

Weaknesses
  • CWE-295

    Improper Certificate Validation