Description
A flaw was found in Contour. When an HTTPProxy is configured with both a fallback certificate and JWT (JSON Web Token) providers, Contour does not properly enforce JWT verification. This allows remote attackers to bypass security checks by sending requests without a valid token, specifically when clients do not provide a TLS Server Name Indication (SNI) or provide an unrecognized SNI. The consequence is unauthorized access to upstream services and potential information disclosure.
No analysis available yet.
Remediation
No remediation available yet.
Tracking
Sign in to view the affected projects.
Advisories
| Source | ID | Title |
|---|---|---|
Github GHSA |
GHSA-g3xr-5w5j-w4q4 | Contour has Improper JWT Verification for Non-SNI Requests on Virtual Hosts with Fallback Certificate Enabled |
References
History
Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:30:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| First Time appeared |
Projectcontour
Projectcontour contour |
|
| Vendors & Products |
Projectcontour
Projectcontour contour |
Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:15:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | A flaw was found in Contour. When an HTTPProxy is configured with both a fallback certificate and JWT (JSON Web Token) providers, Contour does not properly enforce JWT verification. This allows remote attackers to bypass security checks by sending requests without a valid token, specifically when clients do not provide a TLS Server Name Indication (SNI) or provide an unrecognized SNI. The consequence is unauthorized access to upstream services and potential information disclosure. | |
| Title | contour: Contour: JWT verification bypass allows unauthorized access via HTTPProxy misconfiguration | |
| Weaknesses | CWE-295 | |
| References |
| |
| Metrics |
threat_severity
|
cvssV3_1
|
No data.
No data.
No data.
OpenCVE Enrichment
Updated: 2026-07-15T14:15:15Z
Weaknesses
-
CWE-295
Improper Certificate Validation
Github GHSA