Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: initialize inode mapping flags for cached inodes

[BUG]
When running generic/795 with 8K block size, 4K page size, the test
always fails, triggering some ASSERT()s related to folio size:

795 (241074): drop_caches: 3
assertion failed: IS_ALIGNED(start, blocksize) && IS_ALIGNED(end + 1, blocksize), in extent_io.c:1404 (blocksize=8192 root=262 ino=258 start=16826368 end=16830463 mapping min order=0)
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at extent_io.c:1404!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU: 8 UID: 0 PID: 241105 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G OE 7.2.0-rc5-custom+ #442 PREEMPT(full) f4bfb352566f3949f29c233ce6f735050a03b245
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS unknown 02/02/2022
RIP: 0010:assert_folio_range.cold+0x3d/0x3f [btrfs]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
btrfs_read_folio+0x9e/0x170 [btrfs 4cd1dd93b341b8ef766643f9512f4a86259567a3]
prepare_one_folio.constprop.0+0x104/0x2a0 [btrfs 4cd1dd93b341b8ef766643f9512f4a86259567a3]
btrfs_buffered_write+0x285/0xa50 [btrfs 4cd1dd93b341b8ef766643f9512f4a86259567a3]
btrfs_do_write_iter+0x1aa/0x210 [btrfs 4cd1dd93b341b8ef766643f9512f4a86259567a3]
iter_file_splice_write+0x31a/0x540
direct_splice_actor+0x53/0x170
splice_direct_to_actor+0xe9/0x240
do_splice_direct+0x76/0xb0
vfs_copy_file_range+0x1fd/0x630
__x64_sys_copy_file_range+0xf9/0x220
do_syscall_64+0xe1/0x790
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
</TASK>
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

The ASSERT() itself is added by a later patch.
The crash is triggered with that new debug patch, and without this fix.

[CAUSE]
In the above case, the start 16826368 is properly 8K aligned, but the
end (16830463 + 1) is not 8K aligned.
Furthermore the mapping's minimal folio order is 0, not the expected 1
for 8K block size with 4K page size.

So this means some inodes do not have btrfs_set_inode_mapping_order()
called on it.

The missing btrfs_set_inode_mapping_order() call happens for cached
inodes, through the following events:

- btrfs_create_new_inode() called for inode X
Which properly sets minimal folio order for the VFS inode.

- btrfs_update_inode() called for inode X
Which calls btrfs_delayed_update_inode() to create a delayed_node
into root->delayed_nodes xarray.

- Drop cache/memory pressure, evicting in-memory inode X
Which evicted the inode X, but delayed_node is still in
root->delayed_nodes for future reuse.

- btrfs_iget() for inode X called again

btrfs_iget()
|- btrfs_iget_locked()
| |- iget5_locked_rcu()
| Which creates a new vfs_inode for btrfs, whose mapping still
| has the minimal order as 0.
|
|- btrfs_read_locked_inode()
|- btrfs_fill_inode()
| |- btrfs_get_delayed_node()
| Which found out the previous node, and use that delayed
| node to initialize the new inode.
|
|- filled = true;
|- if (filled) goto cache_index;
Which skips the btrfs_update_inode_mapping_flags() and
btrfs_set_inode_mapping_order() calls.
So the inode still has minimal folio order set as 0, not
the required 1.

Thus later page cache read will get a folio whose size is smaller than
block size, as the mapping has its minimal folio order set as 0 not 1,
then trigger the ASSERT().

[FIX]
Move the btrfs_update_inode_mapping_flags() and
btrfs_set_inode_mapping_order() calls under cache_index label,
so that the mapping flags and minimal folio order is always set
no matter if we have a cached inode.
Published: 2026-09-03
Score: 8.8 High
EPSS: < 1% Very Low
KEV: No
Impact: Kernel Crash (Denial of Service)
Action: Immediate Patch
AI Analysis

Impact

The Btrfs filesystem driver fails to initialize inode mapping flags for cached inodes when the inode is re‑loaded after a cache drop. This leaves the inode’s minimal folio order set to 0 instead of the value required for the file system’s block size. Subsequent page cache reads that request a folio of the wrong size trigger an assertion in extent_io.c, resulting in a kernel panic and an abrupt system halt.

Affected Systems

All Linux kernel releases that include the Btrfs driver before the commit that moves the btrfs_update_inode_mapping_flags() and btrfs_set_inode_mapping_order() logic to the cache_index path are affected. This includes every distribution that ships the kernel with the unpatched code and any vendor that has not yet backported the upstream fix. Systems using a custom 7.2.0‑rc5 build emulate the same kernel tree and thus are also vulnerable.

Risk and Exploitability

The CVSS score of 8.8 indicates a high severity issue. The EPSS score is < 1%, showing a very low probability of exploitation at present. The vulnerability is not listed in CISA’s KEV catalog, but that does not prove it has not been exploited in the wild. Based on the description, it is inferred that the attack requires local write access to the Btrfs filesystem to trigger a cache drop and reload of the same inode, which would lead to a kernel panic and constitute a denial‑of‑service attack. No other exploitation impact beyond a crash is documented in the supplied data.

Generated by OpenCVE AI on September 4, 2026 at 09:53 UTC.

Remediation

No vendor fix or workaround currently provided.

OpenCVE Recommended Actions

  • Apply the upstream patch that moves btrfs_update_inode_mapping_flags() and btrfs_set_inode_mapping_order() under the cache_index label, or upgrade to a kernel version that contains this fix and reboot.
  • If the distribution’s backport or vendor patch is available, install and reboot into the patched kernel as soon as possible.
  • As a temporary countermeasure, restrict or remove write access to the affected Btrfs volume for non‑privileged users, or mount the volume as read‑only if write operations are not required, until a proper kernel update can be applied.

Generated by OpenCVE AI on September 4, 2026 at 09:53 UTC.

Tracking

Sign in to view the affected projects.

Advisories

No advisories yet.

History

Fri, 04 Sep 2026 10:15:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
Weaknesses CWE-665

Fri, 04 Sep 2026 08:45:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
Weaknesses CWE-665

Fri, 04 Sep 2026 05:15:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
Metrics cvssV3_1

{'score': 8.8, 'vector': 'CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H'}


Thu, 03 Sep 2026 13:30:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
Weaknesses CWE-665

Thu, 03 Sep 2026 07:30:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
Description In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: initialize inode mapping flags for cached inodes [BUG] When running generic/795 with 8K block size, 4K page size, the test always fails, triggering some ASSERT()s related to folio size: 795 (241074): drop_caches: 3 assertion failed: IS_ALIGNED(start, blocksize) && IS_ALIGNED(end + 1, blocksize), in extent_io.c:1404 (blocksize=8192 root=262 ino=258 start=16826368 end=16830463 mapping min order=0) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at extent_io.c:1404! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 8 UID: 0 PID: 241105 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G OE 7.2.0-rc5-custom+ #442 PREEMPT(full) f4bfb352566f3949f29c233ce6f735050a03b245 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS unknown 02/02/2022 RIP: 0010:assert_folio_range.cold+0x3d/0x3f [btrfs] Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_read_folio+0x9e/0x170 [btrfs 4cd1dd93b341b8ef766643f9512f4a86259567a3] prepare_one_folio.constprop.0+0x104/0x2a0 [btrfs 4cd1dd93b341b8ef766643f9512f4a86259567a3] btrfs_buffered_write+0x285/0xa50 [btrfs 4cd1dd93b341b8ef766643f9512f4a86259567a3] btrfs_do_write_iter+0x1aa/0x210 [btrfs 4cd1dd93b341b8ef766643f9512f4a86259567a3] iter_file_splice_write+0x31a/0x540 direct_splice_actor+0x53/0x170 splice_direct_to_actor+0xe9/0x240 do_splice_direct+0x76/0xb0 vfs_copy_file_range+0x1fd/0x630 __x64_sys_copy_file_range+0xf9/0x220 do_syscall_64+0xe1/0x790 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The ASSERT() itself is added by a later patch. The crash is triggered with that new debug patch, and without this fix. [CAUSE] In the above case, the start 16826368 is properly 8K aligned, but the end (16830463 + 1) is not 8K aligned. Furthermore the mapping's minimal folio order is 0, not the expected 1 for 8K block size with 4K page size. So this means some inodes do not have btrfs_set_inode_mapping_order() called on it. The missing btrfs_set_inode_mapping_order() call happens for cached inodes, through the following events: - btrfs_create_new_inode() called for inode X Which properly sets minimal folio order for the VFS inode. - btrfs_update_inode() called for inode X Which calls btrfs_delayed_update_inode() to create a delayed_node into root->delayed_nodes xarray. - Drop cache/memory pressure, evicting in-memory inode X Which evicted the inode X, but delayed_node is still in root->delayed_nodes for future reuse. - btrfs_iget() for inode X called again btrfs_iget() |- btrfs_iget_locked() | |- iget5_locked_rcu() | Which creates a new vfs_inode for btrfs, whose mapping still | has the minimal order as 0. | |- btrfs_read_locked_inode() |- btrfs_fill_inode() | |- btrfs_get_delayed_node() | Which found out the previous node, and use that delayed | node to initialize the new inode. | |- filled = true; |- if (filled) goto cache_index; Which skips the btrfs_update_inode_mapping_flags() and btrfs_set_inode_mapping_order() calls. So the inode still has minimal folio order set as 0, not the required 1. Thus later page cache read will get a folio whose size is smaller than block size, as the mapping has its minimal folio order set as 0 not 1, then trigger the ASSERT(). [FIX] Move the btrfs_update_inode_mapping_flags() and btrfs_set_inode_mapping_order() calls under cache_index label, so that the mapping flags and minimal folio order is always set no matter if we have a cached inode.
Title btrfs: initialize inode mapping flags for cached inodes
First Time appeared Linux
Linux linux Kernel
CPEs cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Vendors & Products Linux
Linux linux Kernel
References

Subscriptions

Linux Linux Kernel
cve-icon MITRE

Status: PUBLISHED

Assigner: Linux

Published:

Updated: 2026-09-21T13:14:11.093Z

Reserved: 2026-08-26T14:34:25.789Z

Link: CVE-2026-80734

cve-icon Vulnrichment

No data.

cve-icon NVD

Status : Received

Published: 2026-09-03T13:06:12.200

Modified: 2026-09-21T14:17:20.520

Link: CVE-2026-80734

cve-icon Redhat

No data.

cve-icon OpenCVE Enrichment

Updated: 2026-09-04T10:00:05Z

Weaknesses