Description
A flaw was found in open-cluster-management. An agent communicating via the gRPC broker can bypass authorization by manipulating the `ce-clustername` cloud event header attribute, which is used for authorization, independently of the actual event payload. This allows a registered managed cluster to gain unauthorized access, enabling it to move itself into other tenants' ManagedClusterSets and overwrite other clusters' ManagedCluster objects in the hub. The primary consequence is a breach of isolation between managed clusters, leading to unauthorized modification of cluster resources. This can lead to unauthorized receipt of newly delivered tenant workloads, policies, and secrets via Placement decisions. Additionally, an attacker can arbitrarily overwrite other clusters' ManagedCluster objects on the hub or perform unauthorized writes inside another cluster's dedicated hub namespace, such as forging Lease liveness heartbeats to manipulate availability status.
Published: n/a
Score: 3.3 Low
EPSS: n/a
KEV: No
Impact: Privilege Escalation
Action: Patch
AI Analysis

Impact

A flaw in Open Cluster Management allows an agent to modify the ce-clustername header in gRPC messages, bypassing authorization checks that rely on this attribute. By providing an arbitrary cluster name, a registered cluster can masquerade as another, moving itself into other tenants' ManagedClusterSets and overwriting their ManagedCluster objects on the hub. This breach of isolation enables the attacker to receive tenant workloads, policies, and secrets, or manipulate availability status by forging lease heartbeats.

Affected Systems

The vulnerability affects the Open Cluster Management platform used to orchestrate Kubernetes clusters. All deployments of open-cluster-management that expose a gRPC broker and support the ce-clustername header are potentially impacted. Specific version information is not disclosed.

Risk and Exploitability

The CVSS score of 3.3 indicates low overall severity, and no EPSS score is available, meaning the exploitation likelihood is uncertain. The vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog. The attack vector is inferred to be network-based, requiring an attacker to send crafted gRPC messages to the broker from a registered cluster. Successful exploitation can give the cluster control over other clusters’ resources within the same hub, but no remote code execution or full system compromise is described.

Generated by OpenCVE AI on September 24, 2026 at 01:35 UTC.

Remediation

No vendor fix or workaround currently provided.

OpenCVE Recommended Actions

  • Apply the latest release of Open Cluster Management that includes the fix for ce-clustername header validation.
  • Restrict gRPC broker access to only trusted managed clusters and enforce strict header verification to prevent unauthorized cluster names.
  • Enable audit logging and regularly review ManagedClusterSet memberships and ManagedCluster object changes for signs of unauthorized modification.

Generated by OpenCVE AI on September 24, 2026 at 01:35 UTC.

Tracking

Sign in to view the affected projects.

Advisories

No advisories yet.

History

Thu, 24 Sep 2026 00:15:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
Description A flaw was found in open-cluster-management. An agent communicating via the gRPC broker can bypass authorization by manipulating the `ce-clustername` cloud event header attribute, which is used for authorization, independently of the actual event payload. This allows a registered managed cluster to gain unauthorized access, enabling it to move itself into other tenants' ManagedClusterSets and overwrite other clusters' ManagedCluster objects in the hub. The primary consequence is a breach of isolation between managed clusters, leading to unauthorized modification of cluster resources. This can lead to unauthorized receipt of newly delivered tenant workloads, policies, and secrets via Placement decisions. Additionally, an attacker can arbitrarily overwrite other clusters' ManagedCluster objects on the hub or perform unauthorized writes inside another cluster's dedicated hub namespace, such as forging Lease liveness heartbeats to manipulate availability status.
Title open-cluster-management: Open-Cluster-Management: Privilege escalation and unauthorized resource modification in gRPC broker
Weaknesses CWE-639
References
Metrics threat_severity

None

cvssV3_1

{'score': 3.3, 'vector': 'CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L'}

threat_severity

Low


Subscriptions

No data.

cve-icon MITRE

No data.

cve-icon Vulnrichment

No data.

cve-icon NVD

No data.

cve-icon Redhat

Severity : Low

Publid Date: 2026-09-23T14:43:14Z

Links: CVE-2026-91182 - Bugzilla

cve-icon OpenCVE Enrichment

Updated: 2026-09-24T01:45:13Z

Weaknesses
  • CWE-639

    Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key