Description
A vulnerability in CRI-O checkpoint restore allows a user who can create a pod from a malicious checkpointed container to bypass the destination Kubernetes security context. The restored process may retain credentials, Linux capabilities, no_new_privs, and seccomp state from the checkpoint instead of enforcing the destination configuration. This can allow execution with elevated privileges across the container security boundary.
Affected upstream supported versions are CRI-O 1.34 and later. Downstream Red Hat products are affected from OCP 4.17 onward. Fixes have been applied to supported branches but are not yet released.
Exploitation requires permission to create a pod from a malicious checkpoint image and checkpoint restore functionality to be available.
Published: 2026-09-21
Score: 8.8 High
EPSS: n/a
KEV: No
Impact: Privilege Escalation via checkpoint restore bypass
Action: Immediate Patch
AI Analysis

Impact

A flaw in CRI‑O checkpoint restore means that a pod built from a malicious checkpointed container can assign the restored process the original container’s credentials, capabilities, no_new_privs, and seccomp settings, instead of enforcing the destination pod’s security context. This bypass allows the attacker to run code with higher privileges inside the new pod, potentially moving across the container boundary and compromising host resources. The weakness is classified as CWE‑250, Unauthorized Use of Privileged Account.

Affected Systems

Affected systems include Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 and 9, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 (from version 4.17 onward), and Red Hat Confidential Compute Attestation. The vulnerability applies to any CRI‑O installation 1.34 or newer, covering the upstream 1.34, 1.35, 1.36 branches tied to the mentioned OCP releases.

Risk and Exploitability

The CVSS score of 8.8 reflects a high severity, yet the EPSS score is not available, suggesting the exploit probability is uncertain but potentially significant in environments that enable checkpoint/restore. The vulnerability is not yet listed in the CISA KEV catalog, but the attack requires the attacker to possess permission to create pods and the hostile checkpoint image to be present. If an RBAC policy permits pod creation by untrusted actors and the feature gate is enabled, exposure is high; otherwise disabling the feature gate mitigates the risk. In the presence of proper pod‑security standards and image‑policy controls the impact of a successful exploit can be further constrained.

Generated by OpenCVE AI on September 21, 2026 at 11:21 UTC.

Remediation

Vendor Workaround

Upgrade (primary remediation): Update CRI-O to a fixed version once available: 1.36.6 (1.36.x branch), 1.35.9 (1.35.x branch), or 1.34.14 (1.34.x branch). For Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, apply the corresponding OCP update when released. Until the fix is applied, the following measures reduce exposure: Disable checkpoint restore if not required: In OpenShift, container checkpoint/restore requires the ContainerCheckpoint feature gate, which is Tech Preview and not enabled by default. Clusters that have not explicitly enabled this feature gate are not exposed to this flaw. If it was enabled and is not actively needed, disable it. For standalone CRI-O, set enable_criu_support = false in crio.conf under [crio.runtime] and restart the CRI-O service. Restrict pod creation privileges: Limit Kubernetes RBAC for the create and update verbs on pods, deployments, daemonsets, statefulsets, jobs, and cronjobs resources to trusted users and service accounts only. Exploitation requires the ability to schedule a pod referencing a malicious checkpoint image. Enforce Pod Security Standards: Apply the restricted or baseline Pod Security Standard at the namespace level using Pod Security Admission. While this does not directly block checkpoint restore, it limits the security contexts an attacker can request, reducing the impact if combined with other controls. Restrict container image registries: Use an image policy (e.g., OpenShift image policy, Kyverno, or OPA Gatekeeper) to allowlist trusted registries only. This prevents pods from pulling malicious checkpoint images hosted on attacker-controlled registries. Identify and remediate previously restored containers: If checkpoint restore has been used with images from untrusted sources, stop, delete, and recreate those containers. The restored process state may not match the intended security context.


OpenCVE Recommended Actions

  • Upgrade CRI‑O to a fixed version (1.36.6 for the 1.36 branch, 1.35.9 for 1.35, or 1.34.14 for 1.34) once available, and for OpenShift apply the corresponding OCP update once released.
  • Disable checkpoint restore if not required: in OpenShift, keep the ContainerCheckpoint feature gate disabled, or for standalone CRI‑O set enable_criu_support = false in crio.conf and restart CRI‑O.
  • Restrict pod creation privileges: limit the create and update verbs on pods, deployments, daemonsets, statefulsets, jobs, and cronjobs to trusted users and service accounts only.

Generated by OpenCVE AI on September 21, 2026 at 11:21 UTC.

Tracking

Sign in to view the affected projects.

Advisories

No advisories yet.

History

Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:00:00 +0000

Type Values Removed Values Added
Description A vulnerability in CRI-O checkpoint restore allows a user who can create a pod from a malicious checkpointed container to bypass the destination Kubernetes security context. The restored process may retain credentials, Linux capabilities, no_new_privs, and seccomp state from the checkpoint instead of enforcing the destination configuration. This can allow execution with elevated privileges across the container security boundary. Affected upstream supported versions are CRI-O 1.34 and later. Downstream Red Hat products are affected from OCP 4.17 onward. Fixes have been applied to supported branches but are not yet released. Exploitation requires permission to create a pod from a malicious checkpoint image and checkpoint restore functionality to be available.
Title Cri-o: cri-o checkpoint restore bypasses destination security context
First Time appeared Redhat
Redhat confidential Compute Attestation
Redhat enterprise Linux
Redhat openshift
Weaknesses CWE-250
CPEs cpe:/a:redhat:confidential_compute_attestation:1
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9
Vendors & Products Redhat
Redhat confidential Compute Attestation
Redhat enterprise Linux
Redhat openshift
References
Metrics cvssV3_1

{'score': 8.8, 'vector': 'CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H'}


Subscriptions

Redhat Confidential Compute Attestation Enterprise Linux Openshift
cve-icon MITRE

Status: PUBLISHED

Assigner: redhat

Published:

Updated: 2026-09-21T09:49:49.679Z

Reserved: 2026-09-16T13:40:20.528Z

Link: CVE-2026-92574

cve-icon Vulnrichment

No data.

cve-icon NVD

Status : Received

Published: 2026-09-21T10:17:17.360

Modified: 2026-09-21T10:17:17.360

Link: CVE-2026-92574

cve-icon Redhat

No data.

cve-icon OpenCVE Enrichment

Updated: 2026-09-21T11:30:09Z

Weaknesses
  • CWE-250

    Execution with Unnecessary Privileges