CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3283. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-3283. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3283 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6569. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6569. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6569 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4275. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4275. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4275 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-3544. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-3544. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-3544 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
Dell SmartFabric OS10 Software, version(s) 10.5.5.4 through 10.5.5.10 and 10.5.6.x, contain(s) an Use of Hard-coded Password vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Client-side request forgery and Information disclosure. |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: A public posting on 20130831 referenced this ID for a specific issue, but that issue had not been assigned this ID by any CNA. Notes: The posting will later have IDs assigned in accordance with CVE content decisions |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-0996. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-0996. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-0996 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-4944. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-4944. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-4944 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-4214. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-4214. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-4214 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-5881, CVE-2012-5882, CVE-2012-5883. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-5881, CVE-2012-5882, and CVE-2012-5883. Notes: All CVE users should reference one or more of CVE-2012-5881, CVE-2012-5882, and CVE-2012-5883 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-5938. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-5938. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-5938 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1455. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1455. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1455 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-11100. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2017-11100. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-11100 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2018-1000068. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2018-1000068. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2018-1000068 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This was originally intended for a report about TCP Wrappers and the hosts_ctl API function, but further investigation showed that this was documented behavior by that function. Notes: Future CVE identifiers might be assigned to applications that mis-use the API in a security-relevant fashion. |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6426. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6426. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6426 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |