Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP CRM ABAP (Grantor Management)

SAP CRM ABAP (Grantor Management) - versions 700, 701, 702, 712, 713, 714, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, resulting in Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. After successful exploitation, an attacker can cause limited impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application.

Stored Cross-Site Scripting (Stored XSS) vulnerability in SAP UI5 Variant Management

SAP UI5 Variant Management - versions SAP_UI 750, SAP_UI 754, SAP_UI 755, SAP_UI 756, SAP_UI 757, UI_700 200, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs on reading data from the server, resulting in Stored Cross-Site Scripting (Stored XSS) vulnerability. After successful exploitation, an attacker with user level access can cause high impact on confidentiality, modify some information and can cause unavailability of the application at user level.

Session cookie exposure for client side script

Sensitive Cookie Without 'HttpOnly' Flag vulnerability in ABB REX640 PCL1 (firmware modules), ABB REX640 PCL2 (Firmware modules), ABB REX640 PCL3 (firmware modules) allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects REX640 PCL1: from 1.0;0 before 1.0.8; REX640 PCL2: from 1.0;0 before 1.1.4; REX640 PCL3: from 1.0;0 before 1.2.1.

PHOENIX CONTACT: FL/TC MGUARD prone to Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in PHOENIX CONTACT FL/TC MGUARD Family in multiple versions may allow UDP packets to bypass the filter rules and access the solely connected device behind the MGUARD which can be used for flooding attacks.

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC NET PC Software V14 (All versions), SIMATIC NET PC Software V15 (All versions), SIMATIC PCS 7 V8.2 (All versions), SIMATIC PCS 7 V9.0 (All versions), SIMATIC PCS 7 V9.1 (All versions), SIMATIC WinCC (All versions < V8.0), SINAUT Software ST7sc (All versions). Before SIMATIC WinCC V8, legacy OPC services (OPC DA (Data Access), OPC HDA (Historical Data Access), and OPC AE (Alarms & Events)) were used per default. These services were designed on top of the Windows ActiveX and DCOM mechanisms and do not implement state-of-the-art security mechanisms for authentication and encryption of contents.

A vulnerability has been identified in Mendix SAML (Mendix 7 compatible) (All versions >= V1.17.3 < V1.18.0), Mendix SAML (Mendix 7 compatible) (All versions >= V1.16.4 < V1.17.3), Mendix SAML (Mendix 8 compatible) (All versions >= V2.3.0 < V2.4.0), Mendix SAML (Mendix 8 compatible) (All versions >= V2.2.0 < V2.3.0), Mendix SAML (Mendix 9 latest compatible, New Track) (All versions >= V3.3.1 < V3.6.1), Mendix SAML (Mendix 9 latest compatible, New Track) (All versions >= V3.1.9 < V3.3.1), Mendix SAML (Mendix 9 latest compatible, Upgrade Track) (All versions >= V3.3.0 < V3.6.0), Mendix SAML (Mendix 9 latest compatible, Upgrade Track) (All versions >= V3.1.8 < V3.3.0), Mendix SAML (Mendix 9.12/9.18 compatible, New Track) (All versions >= V3.3.1 < V3.3.15), Mendix SAML (Mendix 9.12/9.18 compatible, Upgrade Track) (All versions >= V3.3.0 < V3.3.14), Mendix SAML (Mendix 9.6 compatible, New Track) (All versions >= V3.1.9 < V3.2.7), Mendix SAML (Mendix 9.6 compatible, Upgrade Track) (All versions >= V3.1.8 < V3.2.6). The affected versions of the module insufficiently verify the SAML assertions. This could allow unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass authentication and get access to the application. This CVE entry describes the incomplete fix for CVE-2023-25957 in a specific non default configuration.

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC WinCC (All versions < V7.5.2.13). Affected applications fail to set proper access rights for their installation folder if a non-default installation path was chosen during installation. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to inject arbitrary code and escalate privileges.

A vulnerability has been identified in JT2Go (All versions < V14.2.0.3), Teamcenter Visualization V13.2 (All versions < V13.2.0.13), Teamcenter Visualization V13.3 (All versions < V13.3.0.10), Teamcenter Visualization V14.0 (All versions < V14.0.0.6), Teamcenter Visualization V14.1 (All versions < V14.1.0.8), Teamcenter Visualization V14.2 (All versions < V14.2.0.3). The affected applications contain a null pointer dereference vulnerability while parsing specially crafted CGM files. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to crash the application causing denial of service condition.

A vulnerability has been identified in JT2Go (All versions < V14.2.0.3), Teamcenter Visualization V13.2 (All versions < V13.2.0.13), Teamcenter Visualization V13.3 (All versions < V13.3.0.10), Teamcenter Visualization V14.0 (All versions < V14.0.0.6), Teamcenter Visualization V14.1 (All versions < V14.1.0.8), Teamcenter Visualization V14.2 (All versions < V14.2.0.3). The affected applications contain an out of bounds read past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing a specially crafted CGM file. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to disclose sensitive information.

A vulnerability has been identified in JT2Go (All versions < V14.2.0.3), Teamcenter Visualization V13.2 (All versions < V13.2.0.13), Teamcenter Visualization V13.3 (All versions < V13.3.0.10), Teamcenter Visualization V14.0 (All versions < V14.0.0.6), Teamcenter Visualization V14.1 (All versions < V14.1.0.8), Teamcenter Visualization V14.2 (All versions < V14.2.0.3). The affected applications contain an out of bounds read past the end of an allocated structure while parsing specially crafted CGM files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process.

A vulnerability has been identified in JT2Go (All versions < V14.2.0.3), Teamcenter Visualization V13.2 (All versions < V13.2.0.13), Teamcenter Visualization V13.3 (All versions < V13.3.0.10), Teamcenter Visualization V14.0 (All versions < V14.0.0.6), Teamcenter Visualization V14.1 (All versions < V14.1.0.8), Teamcenter Visualization V14.2 (All versions < V14.2.0.3). The affected applications contain a memory corruption vulnerability while parsing specially crafted CGM files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process.

Grav Arbitrary File Read to Account Takeover

Grav is a file-based Web platform. Prior to version 1.7.46, a low privilege user account with page edit privilege can read any server files using Twig Syntax. This includes Grav user account files - `/grav/user/accounts/*.yaml`. This file stores hashed user password, 2FA secret, and the password reset token. This can allow an adversary to compromise any registered account and read any file in the web server by resetting a password for a user to get access to the password reset token from the file or by cracking the hashed password. A low privileged user may also perform a full account takeover of other registered users including Administrators. Version 1.7.46 contains a patch.

Remote Code Execution by uploading a phar file using frontmatter

Grav is a content management system (CMS). Prior to version 1.7.43, users who may write a page may use the `frontmatter` feature due to insufficient permission validation and inadequate file name validation. This may lead to remote code execution. Version 1.7.43 fixes this issue.

Grav vulnerable to Server Side Template Injection (SSTI) via Twig escape handler

Grav is an open-source, flat-file content management system. Prior to version 1.7.45, due to the unrestricted access to twig extension class from grav context, an attacker can redefine the escape function and execute arbitrary commands. Twig processing of static pages can be enabled in the front matter by any administrative user allowed to create or edit pages. As the Twig processor runs unsandboxed, this behavior can be used to gain arbitrary code execution and elevate privileges on the instance. Version 1.7.45 contains a patch for this issue.

Grav vulnerable to Server Side Template Injection (SSTI)

Grav is an open-source, flat-file content management system. Prior to version 1.7.45, due to the unrestricted access to twig extension class from Grav context, an attacker can redefine config variable. As a result, attacker can bypass a previous SSTI mitigation. Twig processing of static pages can be enabled in the front matter by any administrative user allowed to create or edit pages. As the Twig processor runs unsandboxed, this behavior can be used to gain arbitrary code execution and elevate privileges on the instance. Version 1.7.45 contains a fix for this issue.

Grav vulnerable to Server Side Template Injection (SSTI)

Grav is an open-source, flat-file content management system. Prior to version 1.7.45, Grav validates accessible functions through the Utils::isDangerousFunction function, but does not impose restrictions on twig functions like twig_array_map, allowing attackers to bypass the validation and execute arbitrary commands. Twig processing of static pages can be enabled in the front matter by any administrative user allowed to create or edit pages. As the Twig processor runs unsandboxed, this behavior can be used to gain arbitrary code execution and elevate privileges on the instance. Upgrading to patched version 1.7.45 can mitigate this issue.

Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) with Grav CMS security sandbox bypass

Grav is an open-source, flat-file content management system. Grav CMS prior to version 1.7.45 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI), which allows any authenticated user (editor permissions are sufficient) to execute arbitrary code on the remote server bypassing the existing security sandbox. Version 1.7.45 contains a patch for this issue.

vyper performs incorrect topic logging in raw_log

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, incorrect values can be logged when `raw_log` builtin is called with memory or storage arguments to be used as topics. A contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production. The `build_IR` function of the `RawLog` class fails to properly unwrap the variables provided as topics. Consequently, incorrect values are logged as topics. As of time of publication, no fixed version is available.

vyper performs double eval of the slice args when buffer from adhoc locations

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the `slice` builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when the buffer argument is either `msg.data`, `self.code` or `<address>.code` and either the `start` or `length` arguments have side-effects. It can be easily triggered only with the versions `<0.3.4` as `0.3.4` introduced the unique symbol fence. No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions are available.

vyper performs double eval of raw_args in create_from_blueprint

Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum virtual machine. In versions 0.3.10 and prior, using the `create_from_blueprint` builtin can result in a double eval vulnerability when `raw_args=True` and the `args` argument has side-effects. It can be seen that the `_build_create_IR` function of the `create_from_blueprint` builtin doesn't cache the mentioned `args` argument to the stack. As such, it can be evaluated multiple times (instead of retrieving the value from the stack). No vulnerable production contracts were found. Additionally, double evaluation of side-effects should be easily discoverable in client tests. As such, the impact is low. As of time of publication, no fixed versions exist.