Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Quay
Subscriptions
Total
80 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-20922 | 2 Handlebarsjs, Redhat | 5 Handlebars, Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform, Openshift and 2 more | 2024-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| Handlebars before 4.4.5 allows Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) because of eager matching. The parser may be forced into an endless loop while processing crafted templates. This may allow attackers to exhaust system resources. | ||||
| CVE-2019-20920 | 2 Handlebarsjs, Redhat | 5 Handlebars, Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform, Openshift and 2 more | 2024-08-05 | 8.1 High |
| Handlebars before 3.0.8 and 4.x before 4.5.3 is vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution. The lookup helper fails to properly validate templates, allowing attackers to submit templates that execute arbitrary JavaScript. This can be used to run arbitrary code on a server processing Handlebars templates or in a victim's browser (effectively serving as XSS). | ||||
| CVE-2019-20477 | 3 Fedoraproject, Pyyaml, Redhat | 4 Fedora, Pyyaml, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-08-05 | 9.8 Critical |
| PyYAML 5.1 through 5.1.2 has insufficient restrictions on the load and load_all functions because of a class deserialization issue, e.g., Popen is a class in the subprocess module. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-18342. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19911 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 2 more | 2024-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| There is a DoS vulnerability in Pillow before 6.2.2 caused by FpxImagePlugin.py calling the range function on an unvalidated 32-bit integer if the number of bands is large. On Windows running 32-bit Python, this results in an OverflowError or MemoryError due to the 2 GB limit. However, on Linux running 64-bit Python this results in the process being terminated by the OOM killer. | ||||
| CVE-2019-16789 | 5 Agendaless, Debian, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 6 Waitress, Debian Linux, Fedora and 3 more | 2024-08-05 | 7.1 High |
| In Waitress through version 1.4.0, if a proxy server is used in front of waitress, an invalid request may be sent by an attacker that bypasses the front-end and is parsed differently by waitress leading to a potential for HTTP request smuggling. Specially crafted requests containing special whitespace characters in the Transfer-Encoding header would get parsed by Waitress as being a chunked request, but a front-end server would use the Content-Length instead as the Transfer-Encoding header is considered invalid due to containing invalid characters. If a front-end server does HTTP pipelining to a backend Waitress server this could lead to HTTP request splitting which may lead to potential cache poisoning or unexpected information disclosure. This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.1 through more strict HTTP field validation. | ||||
| CVE-2019-16786 | 5 Agendaless, Debian, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 6 Waitress, Debian Linux, Fedora and 3 more | 2024-08-05 | 7.1 High |
| Waitress through version 1.3.1 would parse the Transfer-Encoding header and only look for a single string value, if that value was not chunked it would fall through and use the Content-Length header instead. According to the HTTP standard Transfer-Encoding should be a comma separated list, with the inner-most encoding first, followed by any further transfer codings, ending with chunked. Requests sent with: "Transfer-Encoding: gzip, chunked" would incorrectly get ignored, and the request would use a Content-Length header instead to determine the body size of the HTTP message. This could allow for Waitress to treat a single request as multiple requests in the case of HTTP pipelining. This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2019-16785 | 5 Agendaless, Debian, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 6 Waitress, Debian Linux, Fedora and 3 more | 2024-08-05 | 7.1 High |
| Waitress through version 1.3.1 implemented a "MAY" part of the RFC7230 which states: "Although the line terminator for the start-line and header fields is the sequence CRLF, a recipient MAY recognize a single LF as a line terminator and ignore any preceding CR." Unfortunately if a front-end server does not parse header fields with an LF the same way as it does those with a CRLF it can lead to the front-end and the back-end server parsing the same HTTP message in two different ways. This can lead to a potential for HTTP request smuggling/splitting whereby Waitress may see two requests while the front-end server only sees a single HTTP message. This issue is fixed in Waitress 1.4.0. | ||||
| CVE-2019-10773 | 2 Redhat, Yarnpkg | 2 Quay, Yarn | 2024-08-04 | 7.8 High |
| In Yarn before 1.21.1, the package install functionality can be abused to generate arbitrary symlinks on the host filesystem by using specially crafted "bin" keys. Existing files could be overwritten depending on the current user permission set. | ||||
| CVE-2019-10205 | 1 Redhat | 1 Quay | 2024-08-04 | 6.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the way Red Hat Quay stores robot account tokens in plain text. An attacker able to perform database queries in the Red Hat Quay database could use the tokens to read or write container images stored in the registry. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9513 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 25 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 22 more | 2024-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9517 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 28 Http Server, Traffic Server, Mac Os X and 25 more | 2024-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9514 | 13 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 10 more | 44 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 41 more | 2024-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9518 | 11 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 8 more | 26 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 23 more | 2024-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9515 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 36 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 33 more | 2024-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9516 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 24 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 21 more | 2024-08-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9512 | 6 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 3 more | 24 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 21 more | 2024-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9511 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 29 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 26 more | 2024-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3864 | 1 Redhat | 1 Quay | 2024-08-04 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability was discovered in all quay-2 versions before quay-3.0.0, in the Quay web GUI where POST requests include a specific parameter which is used as a CSRF token. The token is not refreshed for every request or when a user logged out and in again. An attacker could use a leaked token to gain access to the system using the user's account. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3867 | 1 Redhat | 1 Quay | 2024-08-04 | 4.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in the Quay web application. Sessions in the Quay web application never expire. An attacker, able to gain access to a session, could use it to control or delete a user's container repository. Red Hat Quay 2 and 3 are vulnerable to this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2019-3865 | 1 Redhat | 1 Quay | 2024-08-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in quay-2, where a stored XSS vulnerability has been found in the super user function of quay. Attackers are able to use the name field of service key to inject scripts and make it run when admin users try to change the name. | ||||