| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Nagios XI versions prior to 2012R1.6 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the dashboard dashlet AJAX load functionality. Insufficient validation or escaping of user-supplied input may allow an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary script in the context of a victim's browser. |
| Nagios XI versions prior to 2012R1.3 contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the legacy Core Configuration Manager (CCM) interface. Authenticated users could manipulate SQL queries by supplying crafted input to specific CCM parameters, potentially allowing access to configuration data stored in the application database. Successful exploitation could disclose or modify notification data and, in some cases, impact the application database more broadly. |
| Nagios XI Network Monitor prior to Graph Explorer component version 1.3 contains a command injection vulnerability in `visApi.php`. An authenticated user can inject system commands via unsanitized parameters such as `host`, resulting in remote code execution. |
| Nagios XI versions prior to 2011R1.9 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) via the link-handling functions used by status and report pages. Insufficient validation or escaping of user-supplied input may allow an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary script in the context of a victim's browser. |
| Nagios XI versions prior to 2011R1.9 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) via the Alert Heatmap report and the “My Reports” listing of the web interface. Insufficient validation or escaping of user-supplied input may allow an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary script in the context of a victim's browser. |
| Nagios XI versions prior to 2011R1.9 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) via the recurring downtime script of the web interface. Insufficient validation or escaping of user-supplied input may allow an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary script in the context of a victim's browser. |
| Nagios XI versions prior to 2011R1.9 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) via the handling of xiwindow variables used to build permalinks in the web interface. Insufficient validation or escaping of user-supplied input may allow an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary script in the context of a victim's browser. |
| Nagios XI versions prior to 2011R1.9 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) via the handling of the "backend_url" JavaScript link. Insufficient validation or escaping of user-supplied input may allow an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary script in the context of a victim's browser. |
| Nagios XI versions prior to 2011R1.9 contain privilege escalation vulnerabilities in the scripts that install or update system crontab entries. Due to time-of-check/time-of-use race conditions and missing synchronization or final-path validation, a local low-privileged user could manipulate filesystem state during crontab installation to influence the files or commands executed with elevated privileges, resulting in execution with higher privileges. |
| PHPGurukul Student Record Management System 3.20 is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the id and password parameters in login.php. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/ttm: Fix dummy res NULL ptr deref bug
Check the bo->resource value before accessing the resource
mem_type.
v2: Fix commit description unwrapped warning
<log snip>
[ 40.191227][ T184] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000002: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
[ 40.192995][ T184] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000010-0x0000000000000017]
[ 40.194411][ T184] CPU: 1 PID: 184 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.19.0-rc4-00721-gb297c22b7070 #1
[ 40.196063][ T184] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.0-debian-1.16.0-4 04/01/2014
[ 40.199605][ T184] RIP: 0010:ttm_bo_validate+0x1b3/0x240 [ttm]
[ 40.200754][ T184] Code: e8 72 c5 ff ff 83 f8 b8 74 d4 85 c0 75 54 49 8b 9e 58 01 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 8d 7b 10 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 04 02 84 c0 74 04 3c 03 7e 44 8b 53 10 31 c0 85 d2 0f 85 58
[ 40.203685][ T184] RSP: 0018:ffffc900006df0c8 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 40.204630][ T184] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 1ffff1102f4bb71b
[ 40.205864][ T184] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffc900006df208 RDI: 0000000000000010
[ 40.207102][ T184] RBP: 1ffff920000dbe1a R08: ffffc900006df208 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 40.208394][ T184] R10: ffff88817a5f0000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffc900006df110
[ 40.209692][ T184] R13: ffffc900006df0f0 R14: ffff88817a5db800 R15: ffffc900006df208
[ 40.210862][ T184] FS: 00007f6b1d16e8c0(0000) GS:ffff88839d700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 40.212250][ T184] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 40.213275][ T184] CR2: 000055a1001d4ff0 CR3: 00000001700f4000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[ 40.214469][ T184] Call Trace:
[ 40.214974][ T184] <TASK>
[ 40.215438][ T184] ? ttm_bo_bounce_temp_buffer+0x140/0x140 [ttm]
[ 40.216572][ T184] ? mutex_spin_on_owner+0x240/0x240
[ 40.217456][ T184] ? drm_vma_offset_add+0xaa/0x100 [drm]
[ 40.218457][ T184] ttm_bo_init_reserved+0x3d6/0x540 [ttm]
[ 40.219410][ T184] ? shmem_get_inode+0x744/0x980
[ 40.220231][ T184] ttm_bo_init_validate+0xb1/0x200 [ttm]
[ 40.221172][ T184] ? bo_driver_evict_flags+0x340/0x340 [drm_vram_helper]
[ 40.222530][ T184] ? ttm_bo_init_reserved+0x540/0x540 [ttm]
[ 40.223643][ T184] ? __do_sys_finit_module+0x11a/0x1c0
[ 40.224654][ T184] ? __shmem_file_setup+0x102/0x280
[ 40.234764][ T184] drm_gem_vram_create+0x305/0x480 [drm_vram_helper]
[ 40.235766][ T184] ? bo_driver_evict_flags+0x340/0x340 [drm_vram_helper]
[ 40.236846][ T184] ? __kasan_slab_free+0x108/0x180
[ 40.237650][ T184] drm_gem_vram_fill_create_dumb+0x134/0x340 [drm_vram_helper]
[ 40.238864][ T184] ? local_pci_probe+0xdf/0x180
[ 40.239674][ T184] ? drmm_vram_helper_init+0x400/0x400 [drm_vram_helper]
[ 40.240826][ T184] drm_client_framebuffer_create+0x19c/0x400 [drm]
[ 40.241955][ T184] ? drm_client_buffer_delete+0x200/0x200 [drm]
[ 40.243001][ T184] ? drm_client_pick_crtcs+0x554/0xb80 [drm]
[ 40.244030][ T184] drm_fb_helper_generic_probe+0x23f/0x940 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 40.245226][ T184] ? __cond_resched+0x1c/0xc0
[ 40.245987][ T184] ? drm_fb_helper_memory_range_to_clip+0x180/0x180 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 40.247316][ T184] ? mutex_unlock+0x80/0x100
[ 40.248005][ T184] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x2c0/0x2c0
[ 40.249083][ T184] drm_fb_helper_single_fb_probe+0x907/0xf00 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 40.250314][ T184] ? drm_fb_helper_check_var+0x1180/0x1180 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 40.251540][ T184] ? __cond_resched+0x1c/0xc0
[ 40.252321][ T184] ? mutex_lock+0x9f/0x100
[ 40.253062][ T184] __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0xb9/0x2c0 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 40.254394][ T184] drm_fbdev_client_hotplug+0x56f/0x840 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 40.255477][ T184] drm_fbdev_generic_setup+0x165/0x3c0 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 40.256607][ T184] bochs_pci_probe+0x6b7/0x900 [bochs]
[
---truncated--- |
| A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in SourceCodester Simple To-Do List System 1.0 in the "Add Tasks" text input. An authenticated user can submit HTML/JavaScript that is not correctly sanitized or encoded on output. The injected script is stored and later rendered in the browser of any user who views the task, allowing execution of arbitrary script in the context of the victim's browser. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
BPF: Fix potential bad pointer dereference in bpf_sys_bpf()
The bpf_sys_bpf() helper function allows an eBPF program to load another
eBPF program from within the kernel. In this case the argument union
bpf_attr pointer (as well as the insns and license pointers inside) is a
kernel address instead of a userspace address (which is the case of a
usual bpf() syscall). To make the memory copying process in the syscall
work in both cases, bpfptr_t was introduced to wrap around the pointer
and distinguish its origin. Specifically, when copying memory contents
from a bpfptr_t, a copy_from_user() is performed in case of a userspace
address and a memcpy() is performed for a kernel address.
This can lead to problems because the in-kernel pointer is never checked
for validity. The problem happens when an eBPF syscall program tries to
call bpf_sys_bpf() to load a program but provides a bad insns pointer --
say 0xdeadbeef -- in the bpf_attr union. The helper calls __sys_bpf()
which would then call bpf_prog_load() to load the program.
bpf_prog_load() is responsible for copying the eBPF instructions to the
newly allocated memory for the program; it creates a kernel bpfptr_t for
insns and invokes copy_from_bpfptr(). Internally, all bpfptr_t
operations are backed by the corresponding sockptr_t operations, which
performs direct memcpy() on kernel pointers for copy_from/strncpy_from
operations. Therefore, the code is always happy to dereference the bad
pointer to trigger a un-handle-able page fault and in turn an oops.
However, this is not supposed to happen because at that point the eBPF
program is already verified and should not cause a memory error.
Sample KASAN trace:
[ 25.685056][ T228] ==================================================================
[ 25.685680][ T228] BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in copy_from_bpfptr+0x21/0x30
[ 25.686210][ T228] Read of size 80 at addr 00000000deadbeef by task poc/228
[ 25.686732][ T228]
[ 25.686893][ T228] CPU: 3 PID: 228 Comm: poc Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7 #7
[ 25.687375][ T228] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS d55cb5a 04/01/2014
[ 25.687991][ T228] Call Trace:
[ 25.688223][ T228] <TASK>
[ 25.688429][ T228] dump_stack_lvl+0x73/0x9e
[ 25.688747][ T228] print_report+0xea/0x200
[ 25.689061][ T228] ? copy_from_bpfptr+0x21/0x30
[ 25.689401][ T228] ? _printk+0x54/0x6e
[ 25.689693][ T228] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x70/0xd0
[ 25.690071][ T228] ? copy_from_bpfptr+0x21/0x30
[ 25.690412][ T228] kasan_report+0xb5/0xe0
[ 25.690716][ T228] ? copy_from_bpfptr+0x21/0x30
[ 25.691059][ T228] kasan_check_range+0x2bd/0x2e0
[ 25.691405][ T228] ? copy_from_bpfptr+0x21/0x30
[ 25.691734][ T228] memcpy+0x25/0x60
[ 25.692000][ T228] copy_from_bpfptr+0x21/0x30
[ 25.692328][ T228] bpf_prog_load+0x604/0x9e0
[ 25.692653][ T228] ? cap_capable+0xb4/0xe0
[ 25.692956][ T228] ? security_capable+0x4f/0x70
[ 25.693324][ T228] __sys_bpf+0x3af/0x580
[ 25.693635][ T228] bpf_sys_bpf+0x45/0x240
[ 25.693937][ T228] bpf_prog_f0ec79a5a3caca46_bpf_func1+0xa2/0xbd
[ 25.694394][ T228] bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu+0x2f/0xb0
[ 25.694756][ T228] bpf_prog_test_run_syscall+0x146/0x1c0
[ 25.695144][ T228] bpf_prog_test_run+0x172/0x190
[ 25.695487][ T228] __sys_bpf+0x2c5/0x580
[ 25.695776][ T228] __x64_sys_bpf+0x3a/0x50
[ 25.696084][ T228] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x90
[ 25.696393][ T228] ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x50/0x60
[ 25.696815][ T228] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x36/0xa0
[ 25.697202][ T228] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x20/0x40
[ 25.697586][ T228] ? do_syscall_64+0x6e/0x90
[ 25.697899][ T228] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
[ 25.698312][ T228] RIP: 0033:0x7f6d543fb759
[ 25.698624][ T228] Code: 08 5b 89 e8 5d c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d
---truncated--- |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: do not queue data on closed subflows
Dipanjan reported a syzbot splat at close time:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 10818 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:153
inet_sock_destruct+0x6d0/0x8e0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:153
Modules linked in: uio_ivshmem(OE) uio(E)
CPU: 1 PID: 10818 Comm: kworker/1:16 Tainted: G OE
5.19.0-rc6-g2eae0556bb9d #2
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events mptcp_worker
RIP: 0010:inet_sock_destruct+0x6d0/0x8e0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:153
Code: 21 02 00 00 41 8b 9c 24 28 02 00 00 e9 07 ff ff ff e8 34 4d 91
f9 89 ee 4c 89 e7 e8 4a 47 60 ff e9 a6 fc ff ff e8 20 4d 91 f9 <0f> 0b
e9 84 fe ff ff e8 14 4d 91 f9 0f 0b e9 d4 fd ff ff e8 08 4d
RSP: 0018:ffffc9001b35fa78 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000002879d0 RCX: ffff8881326f3b00
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8881326f3b00 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff888179662674 R08: ffffffff87e983a0 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 00000000000004ea R12: ffff888179662400
R13: ffff888179662428 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88817e38e258
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881f5f00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000020007bc0 CR3: 0000000179592000 CR4: 0000000000150ee0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__sk_destruct+0x4f/0x8e0 net/core/sock.c:2067
sk_destruct+0xbd/0xe0 net/core/sock.c:2112
__sk_free+0xef/0x3d0 net/core/sock.c:2123
sk_free+0x78/0xa0 net/core/sock.c:2134
sock_put include/net/sock.h:1927 [inline]
__mptcp_close_ssk+0x50f/0x780 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2351
__mptcp_destroy_sock+0x332/0x760 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2828
mptcp_worker+0x5d2/0xc90 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2586
process_one_work+0x9cc/0x1650 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
worker_thread+0x623/0x1070 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
kthread+0x2e9/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:376
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:302
</TASK>
The root cause of the problem is that an mptcp-level (re)transmit can
race with mptcp_close() and the packet scheduler checks the subflow
state before acquiring the socket lock: we can try to (re)transmit on
an already closed ssk.
Fix the issue checking again the subflow socket status under the
subflow socket lock protection. Additionally add the missing check
for the fallback-to-tcp case. |
| The send_message.php endpoint in SourceCodester Simple Public Chat Room 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The application does not implement any CSRF-protection mechanisms such as tokens, nonces, or same-site cookie restrictions. An attacker can create a malicious HTML page that, when visited by an authenticated user, will automatically submit a forged POST request to the vulnerable endpoint. This request will be executed with the victim's privileges, allowing the attacker to perform unauthorized actions on their behalf, such as sending arbitrary messages in any chat room. |
| A vulnerability was found in lsfusion platform up to 6.1. Affected is the function DownloadFileRequestHandler of the file web-client/src/main/java/lsfusion/http/controller/file/DownloadFileRequestHandler.java. Performing manipulation of the argument Version results in path traversal. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0 allows an attacker to cause an authenticated administrative user to perform user deletion actions without their consent. The application's user deletion endpoint (e.g., superadmin_user_delete.php) accepts POST requests containing a user_id parameter and does not enforce request origin or anti-CSRF tokens. Because the endpoint lacks proper authentication/authorization checks and CSRF protections, a remote attacker can craft a malicious page that triggers deletion when visited by an authenticated admin, resulting in arbitrary removal of user accounts. |
| CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mptcp: move subflow cleanup in mptcp_destroy_common()
If the mptcp socket creation fails due to a CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE
eBPF program, the MPTCP protocol ends-up leaking all the subflows:
the related cleanup happens in __mptcp_destroy_sock() that is not
invoked in such code path.
Address the issue moving the subflow sockets cleanup in the
mptcp_destroy_common() helper, which is invoked in every msk cleanup
path.
Additionally get rid of the intermediate list_splice_init step, which
is an unneeded relic from the past.
The issue is present since before the reported root cause commit, but
any attempt to backport the fix before that hash will require a complete
rewrite. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in SourceCodester Product Expiry Management System. The User Management module (delete-user.php) allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary user accounts via forged cross-origin GET requests because the endpoint relies solely on session cookies and lacks CSRF protection. |
