| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). Prior to 0.29.13, the backup.listBackupFiles tRPC endpoint in apps/dokploy/server/api/routers/backup.ts passes the search parameter through normalizeS3Path and interpolates it into an rclone lsjson command executed by child_process.exec(), allowing an authenticated user with backup:read permission to execute arbitrary commands on the Dokploy host. This issue is fixed in version 0.29.13. |
| Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). Prior to 0.29.13, Dokploy's WebSocket handlers (in-app terminals and log streamers) authenticate the session but never authorize it. They establish who the user is via validateRequest() and then proceed without consulting the role/permission model that every tRPC procedure enforces. Any authenticated member, can therefore open an interactive shell into any container on the host, including the dokploy container that mounts the Docker socket, and from there obtain root on the host, escaping the application and crossing every tenant boundary. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.29.13. |
| Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). From 0.29.3 until 0.29.13, the incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45628 leaves packages/server/src/db/schema/compose.ts branch fields without server-side validation, allowing a direct compose.update request to store a malicious customGitBranch, branch, gitlabBranch, bitbucketBranch, or giteaBranch. A low-privileged authenticated user can trigger compose.deploy, which passes the stored branch to shell-based Git clone commands in packages/server/src/utils/providers/git.ts, github.ts, gitlab.ts, bitbucket.ts, and gitea.ts, resulting in arbitrary host command execution. This issue is fixed in version 0.29.13. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sctp: don't free the ASCONF's own transport in DEL-IP processing
sctp_process_asconf() caches the transport the ASCONF chunk is processed
against in asconf->transport (== chunk->transport, set once in sctp_rcv()).
For an ASCONF located through its Address Parameter by
__sctp_rcv_asconf_lookup(), that cached transport corresponds to the
Address Parameter, which need not be the packet's source address.
sctp_process_asconf_param() rejects a DEL-IP for the packet source address
(ADDIP D8, SCTP_ERROR_DEL_SRC_IP), but nothing protects asconf->transport.
A single ASCONF can therefore carry, in order:
[Address Parameter L] [DEL-IP L] [DEL-IP 0.0.0.0]
where L differs from the source. The DEL-IP for L passes the D8 check and
calls sctp_assoc_rm_peer() on the transport that asconf->transport still
points at, freeing it (RCU-deferred). The following wildcard DEL-IP then
reuses the now-dangling asconf->transport in sctp_assoc_set_primary() and
sctp_assoc_del_nonprimary_peers(): set_primary() dereferences the freed
transport (->ipaddr, ->state) and plants the dangling pointer into
asoc->peer.primary_path / active_path, and del_nonprimary_peers(), keeping
only the pointer that is no longer on the list, removes every real
transport, leaving the association with a transport_count of 0 and
primary_path/active_path pointing at freed memory.
Reject a DEL-IP that targets the transport the ASCONF is being processed
against, mirroring the existing source-address guard, so the wildcard
branch can never reuse a freed transport. |
| The AI Copilot – Content Generator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.6. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create a new administrator-level user account and achieve full site takeover by saving and executing a malicious workflow containing a wp_create_user action node specifying role=administrator. This vulnerability is exploitable by unauthenticated attackers on any site where the [aiwu-form] shortcode or public chatbot is rendered on a frontend page, as the waic-nonce value is emitted into publicly accessible JavaScript (WAIC_DATA.waicNonce) on those pages, rendering the nonce check a non-functional authorization barrier. |
| OpenYak is a local-first agent runtime for reliable tool-using models, with a desktop workspace built on top. Prior to version 1.1.3, the OpenYak desktop backend binds an HTTP API to `127.0.0.1:<random port>` (commonly 19141) without server-side Origin validation, loopback authentication, or Content-Type enforcement, and with a wildcard CORS policy. Any webpage a user visits while OpenYak is running can issue cross-origin requests to this local server — the browser acts as a proxy into loopback, bypassing OS-level network isolation. Chained, this lets a malicious page execute arbitrary shell commands on the host (RCE) via the build agent with `permission_presets.bash=true`, shut down the service, and exfiltrate chat history and account PII — with no user interaction beyond opening the page. Version 1.1.3 patches the issue. |
| A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit a Path Traversal vulnerability found in UniFi OS devices to access files on the underlying system that could be manipulated to access an underlying account. |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2026.1.3, 2025.11.7 unauthenticated remote code execution was possible via the agent polling protocol |
| A security flaw has been discovered in Shenzhen Aitemi M300 Wi-Fi Repeater r0-ea7890a. Impacted is the function sprintf of the file /protocol.csp?fname=net&opt=smacfilter_conf&function=set&act=add&name=test&enable=1. Performing a manipulation of the argument enable/name/mac results in command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. |
| The InfiniteWP Client WordPress plugin before 1.13.6 does not properly verify the site-connection state and the authenticity of requests to its remote-management endpoint on WordPress Multisite installations, allowing unauthenticated attackers to bind their own key, hijack an administrator session, and take over the entire network, leading to remote code execution. |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability in the Check Point SmartConsole login process allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain an application login token and use it to authenticate with full administrative privileges. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to modify security policies and security configurations. Remote exploitation requires internet access to the Management Server IP address and a configuration that does not restrict Trusted Clients. Check Point is aware that this vulnerability is being exploited and has affected a very small number of customers. |
| An improper authorization vulnerability in daptin through v0.12.34 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read, create, update, and delete usergroup records. The permission check functions (CanRead, CanPeek, CanCreate, CanUpdate, CanDelete, CanRefer) in server/permission/permission.go return true whenever p.UserId equals the requesting userId, but fail to reject the null/zero reference — unlike CanExecute, which explicitly guards it. |
| An Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in the WatchGuard Fireware OS iked process may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects both the mobile user VPN with IKEv2 and the branch office VPN using IKEv2 when configured with a dynamic gateway peer.
If the Firebox was previously configured with the mobile user VPN with IKEv2 or a branch office VPN using IKEv2 to a dynamic gateway peer, and both of those configurations have since been deleted, that Firebox may still be vulnerable if a branch office VPN to a static gateway peer is still configured. |
| Microsoft Azure Kubernetes Service Confidential Container Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| Microsoft Azure Kubernetes Service Confidential Container Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Microsoft Azure Site Recovery Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| Windows Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
