Total
2860 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-20386 | 6 Canonical, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 3 more | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Fedora, Active Iq Unified Manager and 6 more | 2024-08-05 | 2.4 Low |
| An issue was discovered in button_open in login/logind-button.c in systemd before 243. When executing the udevadm trigger command, a memory leak may occur. | ||||
| CVE-2019-20201 | 1 Ezxml Project | 1 Ezxml | 2024-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in ezXML 0.8.3 through 0.8.6. The ezxml_parse_* functions mishandle XML entities, leading to an infinite loop in which memory allocations occur. | ||||
| CVE-2019-20146 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2024-08-05 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) 11.0 through 12.6. It allows Uncontrolled Resource Consumption. | ||||
| CVE-2019-20176 | 2 Fedoraproject, Pureftpd | 2 Fedora, Pure-ftpd | 2024-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| In Pure-FTPd 1.0.49, a stack exhaustion issue was discovered in the listdir function in ls.c. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19911 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 2 more | 2024-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| There is a DoS vulnerability in Pillow before 6.2.2 caused by FpxImagePlugin.py calling the range function on an unvalidated 32-bit integer if the number of bands is large. On Windows running 32-bit Python, this results in an OverflowError or MemoryError due to the 2 GB limit. However, on Linux running 64-bit Python this results in the process being terminated by the OOM killer. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19922 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Linux and 3 more | 15 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Linux Kernel and 12 more | 2024-08-05 | 5.5 Medium |
| kernel/sched/fair.c in the Linux kernel before 5.3.9, when cpu.cfs_quota_us is used (e.g., with Kubernetes), allows attackers to cause a denial of service against non-cpu-bound applications by generating a workload that triggers unwanted slice expiration, aka CID-de53fd7aedb1. (In other words, although this slice expiration would typically be seen with benign workloads, it is possible that an attacker could calculate how many stray requests are required to force an entire Kubernetes cluster into a low-performance state caused by slice expiration, and ensure that a DDoS attack sent that number of stray requests. An attack does not affect the stability of the kernel; it only causes mismanagement of application execution.) | ||||
| CVE-2019-19906 | 8 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 5 more | 20 Bookkeeper, Ipados, Iphone Os and 17 more | 2024-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| cyrus-sasl (aka Cyrus SASL) 2.1.27 has an out-of-bounds write leading to unauthenticated remote denial-of-service in OpenLDAP via a malformed LDAP packet. The OpenLDAP crash is ultimately caused by an off-by-one error in _sasl_add_string in common.c in cyrus-sasl. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19582 | 2 Fedoraproject, Xen | 2 Fedora, Xen | 2024-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.12.x allowing x86 guest OS users to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) because certain bit iteration is mishandled. In a number of places bitmaps are being used by the hypervisor to track certain state. Iteration over all bits involves functions which may misbehave in certain corner cases: On x86 accesses to bitmaps with a compile time known size of 64 may incur undefined behavior, which may in particular result in infinite loops. A malicious guest may cause a hypervisor crash or hang, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). All versions of Xen are vulnerable. x86 systems with 64 or more nodes are vulnerable (there might not be any such systems that Xen would run on). x86 systems with less than 64 nodes are not vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19578 | 2 Fedoraproject, Xen | 2 Fedora, Xen | 2024-08-05 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.12.x allowing x86 PV guest OS users to cause a denial of service via degenerate chains of linear pagetables, because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2017-15595. "Linear pagetables" is a technique which involves either pointing a pagetable at itself, or to another pagetable of the same or higher level. Xen has limited support for linear pagetables: A page may either point to itself, or point to another pagetable of the same level (i.e., L2 to L2, L3 to L3, and so on). XSA-240 introduced an additional restriction that limited the "depth" of such chains by allowing pages to either *point to* other pages of the same level, or *be pointed to* by other pages of the same level, but not both. To implement this, we keep track of the number of outstanding times a page points to or is pointed to another page table, to prevent both from happening at the same time. Unfortunately, the original commit introducing this reset this count when resuming validation of a partially-validated pagetable, incorrectly dropping some "linear_pt_entry" counts. If an attacker could engineer such a situation to occur, they might be able to make loops or other arbitrary chains of linear pagetables, as described in XSA-240. A malicious or buggy PV guest may cause the hypervisor to crash, resulting in Denial of Service (DoS) affecting the entire host. Privilege escalation and information leaks cannot be excluded. All versions of Xen are vulnerable. Only x86 systems are affected. Arm systems are not affected. Only x86 PV guests can leverage the vulnerability. x86 HVM and PVH guests cannot leverage the vulnerability. Only systems which have enabled linear pagetables are vulnerable. Systems which have disabled linear pagetables, either by selecting CONFIG_PV_LINEAR_PT=n when building the hypervisor, or adding pv-linear-pt=false on the command-line, are not vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19583 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Opensuse and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Fedora, Leap and 1 more | 2024-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.12.x allowing x86 HVM/PVH guest OS users to cause a denial of service (guest OS crash) because VMX VMEntry checks mishandle a certain case. Please see XSA-260 for background on the MovSS shadow. Please see XSA-156 for background on the need for #DB interception. The VMX VMEntry checks do not like the exact combination of state which occurs when #DB in intercepted, Single Stepping is active, and blocked by STI/MovSS is active, despite this being a legitimate state to be in. The resulting VMEntry failure is fatal to the guest. HVM/PVH guest userspace code may be able to crash the guest, resulting in a guest Denial of Service. All versions of Xen are affected. Only systems supporting VMX hardware virtual extensions (Intel, Cyrix, or Zhaoxin CPUs) are affected. Arm and AMD systems are unaffected. Only HVM/PVH guests are affected. PV guests cannot leverage the vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19300 | 1 Siemens | 65 Ktk Ate530s, Ktk Ate530s Firmware, Sidoor Atd430w and 62 more | 2024-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: EK-ERTEC 200, Development/Evaluation Kits for PROFINET IO: EK-ERTEC 200P, KTK ATE530S, SIDOOR ATD430W, SIDOOR ATE530S COATED, SIDOOR ATE531S, SIMATIC ET 200AL IM 157-1 PN (6ES7157-1AB00-0AB0), SIMATIC ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HF (6ES7155-5AA00-0AC0), SIMATIC ET 200pro IM 154-8 PN/DP CPU (6ES7154-8AB01-0AB0), SIMATIC ET 200pro IM 154-8F PN/DP CPU (6ES7154-8FB01-0AB0), SIMATIC ET 200pro IM 154-8FX PN/DP CPU (6ES7154-8FX00-0AB0), SIMATIC ET 200S IM 151-8 PN/DP CPU (6ES7151-8AB01-0AB0), SIMATIC ET 200S IM 151-8F PN/DP CPU (6ES7151-8FB01-0AB0), SIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 MF HF (6ES7155-6MU00-0CN0), SIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HA (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF (6ES7155-6AU00-0CN0), SIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN/2 HF (6ES7155-6AU01-0CN0), SIMATIC ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN/3 HF (6ES7155-6AU30-0CN0), SIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET 200SP Open Controller CPU 1515SP PC2 (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, AI 8xRTD/TC, M12-L (6ES7144-6JF00-0BB0), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, CM 4x IO-Link, M12-L (6ES7148-6JE00-0BB0), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, CM 8x IO-Link, M12-L (6ES7148-6JG00-0BB0), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, CM 8x IO-Link, M12-L (6ES7148-6JJ00-0BB0), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, DI 16x24VDC, M12-L (6ES7141-6BH00-0BB0), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, DI 8x24VDC, M12-L (6ES7141-6BG00-0BB0), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, DIQ 16x24VDC/2A, M12-L (6ES7143-6BH00-0BB0), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, DQ 8x24VDC/0,5A, M12-L (6ES7142-6BG00-0BB0), SIMATIC ET200ecoPN, DQ 8x24VDC/2A, M12-L (6ES7142-6BR00-0BB0), SIMATIC MICRO-DRIVE PDC, SIMATIC PN/MF Coupler (6ES7158-3MU10-0XA0), SIMATIC PN/PN Coupler (6ES7158-3AD10-0XA0), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-1500 Software Controller, SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP (6ES7314-6EH04-0AB0), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DP (6ES7315-2EH14-0AB0), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DP (6ES7315-2FJ14-0AB0), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 315T-3 PN/DP (6ES7315-7TJ10-0AB0), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DP (6ES7317-2EK14-0AB0), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DP (6ES7317-2FK14-0AB0), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317T-3 PN/DP (6ES7317-7TK10-0AB0), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 317TF-3 PN/DP (6ES7317-7UL10-0AB0), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319-3 PN/DP (6ES7318-3EL01-0AB0), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU 319F-3 PN/DP (6ES7318-3FL01-0AB0), SIMATIC S7-400 H V6 and below CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V7 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-410 V10 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC S7-410 V8 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants), SIMATIC TDC CP51M1, SIMATIC TDC CPU555, SIMATIC WinAC RTX 2010 (6ES7671-0RC08-0YA0), SIMATIC WinAC RTX F 2010 (6ES7671-1RC08-0YA0), SINAMICS S/G Control Unit w. PROFINET, SIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HF (6AG1155-5AA00-2AC0), SIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HF (6AG1155-5AA00-7AC0), SIPLUS ET 200MP IM 155-5 PN HF T1 RAIL (6AG2155-5AA00-1AC0), SIPLUS ET 200S IM 151-8 PN/DP CPU (6AG1151-8AB01-7AB0), SIPLUS ET 200S IM 151-8F PN/DP CPU (6AG1151-8FB01-2AB0), SIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF (6AG1155-6AU00-2CN0), SIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF (6AG1155-6AU00-4CN0), SIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF (6AG1155-6AU01-2CN0), SIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF (6AG1155-6AU01-7CN0), SIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF T1 RAIL (6AG2155-6AU00-1CN0), SIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF T1 RAIL (6AG2155-6AU01-1CN0), SIPLUS ET 200SP IM 155-6 PN HF TX RAIL (6AG2155-6AU01-4CN0), SIPLUS NET PN/PN Coupler (6AG2158-3AD10-4XA0), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 314C-2 PN/DP (6AG1314-6EH04-7AB0), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315-2 PN/DP (6AG1315-2EH14-7AB0), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 315F-2 PN/DP (6AG1315-2FJ14-2AB0), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317-2 PN/DP (6AG1317-2EK14-7AB0), SIPLUS S7-300 CPU 317F-2 PN/DP (6AG1317-2FK14-2AB0). The Interniche-based TCP Stack can be forced to make very expensive calls for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19343 | 2 Netapp, Redhat | 6 Active Iq Unified Manager, Jboss-remoting, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 3 more | 2024-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Undertow when using Remoting as shipped in Red Hat Jboss EAP before version 7.2.4. A memory leak in HttpOpenListener due to holding remote connections indefinitely may lead to denial of service. Versions before undertow 2.0.25.SP1 and jboss-remoting 5.0.14.SP1 are believed to be vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19301 | 1 Siemens | 26 Scalance X-200irt, Scalance X-200irt Firmware, Scalance X-200irt Pro and 23 more | 2024-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X200-4P IRT, SCALANCE X201-3P IRT, SCALANCE X201-3P IRT PRO, SCALANCE X202-2IRT, SCALANCE X202-2P IRT, SCALANCE X202-2P IRT PRO, SCALANCE X204-2, SCALANCE X204-2FM, SCALANCE X204-2LD, SCALANCE X204-2LD TS, SCALANCE X204-2TS, SCALANCE X204IRT, SCALANCE X204IRT PRO, SCALANCE X206-1, SCALANCE X206-1LD, SCALANCE X208, SCALANCE X208PRO, SCALANCE X212-2, SCALANCE X212-2LD, SCALANCE X216, SCALANCE X224, SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X304-2FE, SCALANCE X306-1LD FE, SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X320-1 FE, SCALANCE X320-1-2LD FE, SCALANCE X408-2, SCALANCE XF201-3P IRT, SCALANCE XF202-2P IRT, SCALANCE XF204, SCALANCE XF204-2, SCALANCE XF204-2BA IRT, SCALANCE XF204IRT, SCALANCE XF206-1, SCALANCE XF208, SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE TS (24V, ports on front), SIMATIC CP 343-1 Advanced, SIMATIC CP 442-1 RNA, SIMATIC CP 443-1, SIMATIC CP 443-1, SIMATIC CP 443-1 Advanced, SIMATIC CP 443-1 RNA, SIMATIC RF180C, SIMATIC RF182C, SIPLUS NET CP 343-1 Advanced, SIPLUS NET CP 443-1, SIPLUS NET CP 443-1 Advanced, SIPLUS NET SCALANCE X308-2. The VxWorks-based Profinet TCP Stack can be forced to make very expensive calls for every incoming packet which can lead to a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19076 | 3 Canonical, Linux, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux | 2024-08-05 | 5.9 Medium |
| A memory leak in the nfp_abm_u32_knode_replace() function in drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/abm/cls.c in the Linux kernel before 5.3.6 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption), aka CID-78beef629fd9. NOTE: This has been argued as not a valid vulnerability. The upstream commit 78beef629fd9 was reverted | ||||
| CVE-2019-19070 | 2 Fedoraproject, Linux | 2 Fedora, Linux Kernel | 2024-08-05 | 7.5 High |
| A memory leak in the spi_gpio_probe() function in drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c in the Linux kernel through 5.3.11 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by triggering devm_add_action_or_reset() failures, aka CID-d3b0ffa1d75d. NOTE: third parties dispute the relevance of this because the system must have already been out of memory before the probe began | ||||
| CVE-2019-19067 | 4 Canonical, Linux, Opensuse and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Linux Kernel, Leap and 1 more | 2024-08-05 | 4.4 Medium |
| Four memory leaks in the acp_hw_init() function in drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_acp.c in the Linux kernel before 5.3.8 allow attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by triggering mfd_add_hotplug_devices() or pm_genpd_add_device() failures, aka CID-57be09c6e874. NOTE: third parties dispute the relevance of this because the attacker must already have privileges for module loading | ||||
| CVE-2019-19065 | 4 Canonical, Linux, Opensuse and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Linux Kernel, Leap and 1 more | 2024-08-05 | 4.7 Medium |
| A memory leak in the sdma_init() function in drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/sdma.c in the Linux kernel before 5.3.9 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by triggering rhashtable_init() failures, aka CID-34b3be18a04e. NOTE: This has been disputed as not a vulnerability because "rhashtable_init() can only fail if it is passed invalid values in the second parameter's struct, but when invoked from sdma_init() that is a pointer to a static const struct, so an attacker could only trigger failure if they could corrupt kernel memory (in which case a small memory leak is not a significant problem). | ||||
| CVE-2019-19055 | 4 Canonical, Fedoraproject, Linux and 1 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Fedora, Linux Kernel and 2 more | 2024-08-05 | 5.5 Medium |
| A memory leak in the nl80211_get_ftm_responder_stats() function in net/wireless/nl80211.c in the Linux kernel through 5.3.11 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by triggering nl80211hdr_put() failures, aka CID-1399c59fa929. NOTE: third parties dispute the relevance of this because it occurs on a code path where a successful allocation has already occurred | ||||
| CVE-2019-19046 | 4 Fedoraproject, Linux, Opensuse and 1 more | 6 Fedora, Linux Kernel, Leap and 3 more | 2024-08-05 | 6.5 Medium |
| A memory leak in the __ipmi_bmc_register() function in drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c in the Linux kernel through 5.3.11 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by triggering ida_simple_get() failure, aka CID-4aa7afb0ee20. NOTE: third parties dispute the relevance of this because an attacker cannot realistically control this failure at probe time | ||||
| CVE-2019-19066 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 3 more | 2024-08-05 | 4.7 Medium |
| A memory leak in the bfad_im_get_stats() function in drivers/scsi/bfa/bfad_attr.c in the Linux kernel through 5.3.11 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by triggering bfa_port_get_stats() failures, aka CID-0e62395da2bd. | ||||