{"dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "cveMetadata": {"cveId": "CVE-2024-42266", "assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "state": "PUBLISHED", "assignerShortName": "Linux", "dateReserved": "2024-07-30T07:40:12.259Z", "datePublished": "2024-08-17T08:54:22.308Z", "dateUpdated": "2025-05-04T09:25:31.610Z"}, "containers": {"cna": {"providerMetadata": {"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "shortName": "Linux", "dateUpdated": "2025-05-04T09:25:31.610Z"}, "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: make cow_file_range_inline() honor locked_page on error\n\nThe btrfs buffered write path runs through __extent_writepage() which\nhas some tricky return value handling for writepage_delalloc().\nSpecifically, when that returns 1, we exit, but for other return values\nwe continue and end up calling btrfs_folio_end_all_writers(). If the\nfolio has been unlocked (note that we check the PageLocked bit at the\nstart of __extent_writepage()), this results in an assert panic like\nthis one from syzbot:\n\n BTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in free_log_tree:3267: errno=-5 IO failure\n BTRFS warning (device loop0 state EAL): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.\n BTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in cleanup_transaction:2018: errno=-5 IO failure\n assertion failed: folio_test_locked(folio), in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871!\n Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\n CPU: 1 PID: 5090 Comm: syz-executor225 Not tainted\n 6.10.0-syzkaller-05505-gb1bc554e009e #0\n Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS\n Google 06/27/2024\n RIP: 0010:btrfs_folio_end_all_writers+0x55b/0x610 fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871\n Code: e9 d3 fb ff ff e8 25 22 c2 fd 48 c7 c7 c0 3c 0e 8c 48 c7 c6 80 3d\n 0e 8c 48 c7 c2 60 3c 0e 8c b9 67 03 00 00 e8 66 47 ad 07 90 <0f> 0b e8\n 6e 45 b0 07 4c 89 ff be 08 00 00 00 e8 21 12 25 fe 4c 89\n RSP: 0018:ffffc900033d72e0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n RAX: 0000000000000045 RBX: 00fff0000000402c RCX: 663b7a08c50a0a00\n RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\n RBP: ffffc900033d73b0 R08: ffffffff8176b98c R09: 1ffff9200067adfc\n R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff5200067adfd R12: 0000000000000001\n R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffea0001cbee80\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000)\n knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 00007f5f076012f8 CR3: 000000000e134000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\n DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n Call Trace:\n <TASK>\n __extent_writepage fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1597 [inline]\n extent_write_cache_pages fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2251 [inline]\n btrfs_writepages+0x14d7/0x2760 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2373\n do_writepages+0x359/0x870 mm/page-writeback.c:2656\n filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x125/0x180 mm/filemap.c:397\n __filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:430 [inline]\n __filemap_fdatawrite mm/filemap.c:436 [inline]\n filemap_flush+0xdf/0x130 mm/filemap.c:463\n btrfs_release_file+0x117/0x130 fs/btrfs/file.c:1547\n __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422\n task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:222\n exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline]\n do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:877\n do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1026\n __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1037 [inline]\n __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1035 [inline]\n __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1035\n x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640\n arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n RIP: 0033:0x7f5f075b70c9\n Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at\n 0x7f5f075b709f.\n\nI was hitting the same issue by doing hundreds of accelerated runs of\ngeneric/475, which also hits IO errors by design.\n\nI instrumented that reproducer with bpftrace and found that the\nundesirable folio_unlock was coming from the following callstack:\n\n folio_unlock+5\n __process_pages_contig+475\n cow_file_range_inline.constprop.0+230\n cow_file_range+803\n btrfs_run_delalloc_range+566\n writepage_delalloc+332\n __extent_writepage # inlined in my stacktrace, but I added it here\n extent_write_cache_pages+622\n\nLooking at the bisected-to pa\n---truncated---"}], "affected": [{"product": "Linux", "vendor": "Linux", "defaultStatus": "unaffected", "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "programFiles": ["fs/btrfs/inode.c"], "versions": [{"version": "0586d0a89e77d717da14df42648ace4a9fd67981", "lessThan": "061e41581606000a83ce0f0f01d6ad338f3704e9", "status": "affected", "versionType": "git"}, {"version": "0586d0a89e77d717da14df42648ace4a9fd67981", "lessThan": "478574370bef7951fbd9ef5155537d6cbed49472", "status": "affected", "versionType": "git"}]}, {"product": "Linux", "vendor": "Linux", "defaultStatus": "affected", "repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "programFiles": ["fs/btrfs/inode.c"], "versions": [{"version": "6.10", "status": "affected"}, {"version": "0", "lessThan": "6.10", "status": "unaffected", "versionType": "semver"}, {"version": "6.10.4", "lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*", "status": "unaffected", "versionType": "semver"}, {"version": "6.11", "lessThanOrEqual": "*", "status": "unaffected", "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix"}]}], "cpeApplicability": [{"nodes": [{"operator": "OR", "negate": false, "cpeMatch": [{"vulnerable": true, "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "versionStartIncluding": "6.10", "versionEndExcluding": "6.10.4"}, {"vulnerable": true, "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "versionStartIncluding": "6.10", "versionEndExcluding": "6.11"}]}]}], "references": [{"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/061e41581606000a83ce0f0f01d6ad338f3704e9"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/478574370bef7951fbd9ef5155537d6cbed49472"}], "title": "btrfs: make cow_file_range_inline() honor locked_page on error", "x_generator": {"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"}}, "adp": [{"metrics": [{"other": {"type": "ssvc", "content": {"id": "CVE-2024-42266", "role": "CISA Coordinator", "options": [{"Exploitation": "none"}, {"Automatable": "no"}, {"Technical Impact": "partial"}], "version": "2.0.3", "timestamp": "2024-09-10T16:12:27.580534Z"}}}], "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP", "dateUpdated": "2024-09-12T17:33:05.700Z"}}]}}

{"dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "containers": {"adp": [{"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", "metrics": [{"other": {"type": "ssvc", "content": {"id": "CVE-2024-42266", "role": "CISA Coordinator", "options": [{"Exploitation": "none"}, {"Automatable": "no"}, {"Technical Impact": "partial"}], "version": "2.0.3", "timestamp": "2024-09-10T16:12:27.580534Z"}}}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP", "dateUpdated": "2024-09-11T12:42:14.401Z"}}], "cna": {"title": "btrfs: make cow_file_range_inline() honor locked_page on error", "affected": [{"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "vendor": "Linux", "product": "Linux", "versions": [{"status": "affected", "version": "0586d0a89e77d717da14df42648ace4a9fd67981", "lessThan": "061e41581606000a83ce0f0f01d6ad338f3704e9", "versionType": "git"}, {"status": "affected", "version": "0586d0a89e77d717da14df42648ace4a9fd67981", "lessThan": "478574370bef7951fbd9ef5155537d6cbed49472", "versionType": "git"}], "programFiles": ["fs/btrfs/inode.c"], "defaultStatus": "unaffected"}, {"repo": "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git", "vendor": "Linux", "product": "Linux", "versions": [{"status": "affected", "version": "6.10"}, {"status": "unaffected", "version": "0", "lessThan": "6.10", "versionType": "semver"}, {"status": "unaffected", "version": "6.10.4", "versionType": "semver", "lessThanOrEqual": "6.10.*"}, {"status": "unaffected", "version": "6.11", "versionType": "original_commit_for_fix", "lessThanOrEqual": "*"}], "programFiles": ["fs/btrfs/inode.c"], "defaultStatus": "affected"}], "references": [{"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/061e41581606000a83ce0f0f01d6ad338f3704e9"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/478574370bef7951fbd9ef5155537d6cbed49472"}], "x_generator": {"engine": "bippy-1.2.0"}, "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: make cow_file_range_inline() honor locked_page on error\n\nThe btrfs buffered write path runs through __extent_writepage() which\nhas some tricky return value handling for writepage_delalloc().\nSpecifically, when that returns 1, we exit, but for other return values\nwe continue and end up calling btrfs_folio_end_all_writers(). If the\nfolio has been unlocked (note that we check the PageLocked bit at the\nstart of __extent_writepage()), this results in an assert panic like\nthis one from syzbot:\n\n BTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in free_log_tree:3267: errno=-5 IO failure\n BTRFS warning (device loop0 state EAL): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.\n BTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in cleanup_transaction:2018: errno=-5 IO failure\n assertion failed: folio_test_locked(folio), in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871!\n Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\n CPU: 1 PID: 5090 Comm: syz-executor225 Not tainted\n 6.10.0-syzkaller-05505-gb1bc554e009e #0\n Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS\n Google 06/27/2024\n RIP: 0010:btrfs_folio_end_all_writers+0x55b/0x610 fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871\n Code: e9 d3 fb ff ff e8 25 22 c2 fd 48 c7 c7 c0 3c 0e 8c 48 c7 c6 80 3d\n 0e 8c 48 c7 c2 60 3c 0e 8c b9 67 03 00 00 e8 66 47 ad 07 90 <0f> 0b e8\n 6e 45 b0 07 4c 89 ff be 08 00 00 00 e8 21 12 25 fe 4c 89\n RSP: 0018:ffffc900033d72e0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n RAX: 0000000000000045 RBX: 00fff0000000402c RCX: 663b7a08c50a0a00\n RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\n RBP: ffffc900033d73b0 R08: ffffffff8176b98c R09: 1ffff9200067adfc\n R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff5200067adfd R12: 0000000000000001\n R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffea0001cbee80\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000)\n knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 00007f5f076012f8 CR3: 000000000e134000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\n DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n Call Trace:\n <TASK>\n __extent_writepage fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1597 [inline]\n extent_write_cache_pages fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2251 [inline]\n btrfs_writepages+0x14d7/0x2760 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2373\n do_writepages+0x359/0x870 mm/page-writeback.c:2656\n filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x125/0x180 mm/filemap.c:397\n __filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:430 [inline]\n __filemap_fdatawrite mm/filemap.c:436 [inline]\n filemap_flush+0xdf/0x130 mm/filemap.c:463\n btrfs_release_file+0x117/0x130 fs/btrfs/file.c:1547\n __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422\n task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:222\n exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline]\n do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:877\n do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1026\n __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1037 [inline]\n __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1035 [inline]\n __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1035\n x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640\n arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n RIP: 0033:0x7f5f075b70c9\n Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at\n 0x7f5f075b709f.\n\nI was hitting the same issue by doing hundreds of accelerated runs of\ngeneric/475, which also hits IO errors by design.\n\nI instrumented that reproducer with bpftrace and found that the\nundesirable folio_unlock was coming from the following callstack:\n\n folio_unlock+5\n __process_pages_contig+475\n cow_file_range_inline.constprop.0+230\n cow_file_range+803\n btrfs_run_delalloc_range+566\n writepage_delalloc+332\n __extent_writepage # inlined in my stacktrace, but I added it here\n extent_write_cache_pages+622\n\nLooking at the bisected-to pa\n---truncated---"}], "cpeApplicability": [{"nodes": [{"negate": false, "cpeMatch": [{"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "versionEndExcluding": "6.10.4", "versionStartIncluding": "6.10"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "versionEndExcluding": "6.11", "versionStartIncluding": "6.10"}], "operator": "OR"}]}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "shortName": "Linux", "dateUpdated": "2025-05-04T09:25:31.610Z"}}}, "cveMetadata": {"cveId": "CVE-2024-42266", "state": "PUBLISHED", "dateUpdated": "2025-05-04T09:25:31.610Z", "dateReserved": "2024-07-30T07:40:12.259Z", "assignerOrgId": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "datePublished": "2024-08-17T08:54:22.308Z", "assignerShortName": "Linux"}, "dataVersion": "5.1"}

{"cveTags": [], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: make cow_file_range_inline() honor locked_page on error\n\nThe btrfs buffered write path runs through __extent_writepage() which\nhas some tricky return value handling for writepage_delalloc().\nSpecifically, when that returns 1, we exit, but for other return values\nwe continue and end up calling btrfs_folio_end_all_writers(). If the\nfolio has been unlocked (note that we check the PageLocked bit at the\nstart of __extent_writepage()), this results in an assert panic like\nthis one from syzbot:\n\n BTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in free_log_tree:3267: errno=-5 IO failure\n BTRFS warning (device loop0 state EAL): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.\n BTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in cleanup_transaction:2018: errno=-5 IO failure\n assertion failed: folio_test_locked(folio), in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871\n ------------[ cut here ]------------\n kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871!\n Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\n CPU: 1 PID: 5090 Comm: syz-executor225 Not tainted\n 6.10.0-syzkaller-05505-gb1bc554e009e #0\n Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS\n Google 06/27/2024\n RIP: 0010:btrfs_folio_end_all_writers+0x55b/0x610 fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871\n Code: e9 d3 fb ff ff e8 25 22 c2 fd 48 c7 c7 c0 3c 0e 8c 48 c7 c6 80 3d\n 0e 8c 48 c7 c2 60 3c 0e 8c b9 67 03 00 00 e8 66 47 ad 07 90 <0f> 0b e8\n 6e 45 b0 07 4c 89 ff be 08 00 00 00 e8 21 12 25 fe 4c 89\n RSP: 0018:ffffc900033d72e0 EFLAGS: 00010246\n RAX: 0000000000000045 RBX: 00fff0000000402c RCX: 663b7a08c50a0a00\n RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\n RBP: ffffc900033d73b0 R08: ffffffff8176b98c R09: 1ffff9200067adfc\n R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff5200067adfd R12: 0000000000000001\n R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffea0001cbee80\n FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000)\n knlGS:0000000000000000\n CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\n CR2: 00007f5f076012f8 CR3: 000000000e134000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\n DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\n DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\n Call Trace:\n <TASK>\n __extent_writepage fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1597 [inline]\n extent_write_cache_pages fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2251 [inline]\n btrfs_writepages+0x14d7/0x2760 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2373\n do_writepages+0x359/0x870 mm/page-writeback.c:2656\n filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x125/0x180 mm/filemap.c:397\n __filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:430 [inline]\n __filemap_fdatawrite mm/filemap.c:436 [inline]\n filemap_flush+0xdf/0x130 mm/filemap.c:463\n btrfs_release_file+0x117/0x130 fs/btrfs/file.c:1547\n __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422\n task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:222\n exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline]\n do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:877\n do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1026\n __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1037 [inline]\n __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1035 [inline]\n __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1035\n x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640\n arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n RIP: 0033:0x7f5f075b70c9\n Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at\n 0x7f5f075b709f.\n\nI was hitting the same issue by doing hundreds of accelerated runs of\ngeneric/475, which also hits IO errors by design.\n\nI instrumented that reproducer with bpftrace and found that the\nundesirable folio_unlock was coming from the following callstack:\n\n folio_unlock+5\n __process_pages_contig+475\n cow_file_range_inline.constprop.0+230\n cow_file_range+803\n btrfs_run_delalloc_range+566\n writepage_delalloc+332\n __extent_writepage # inlined in my stacktrace, but I added it here\n extent_write_cache_pages+622\n\nLooking at the bisected-to pa\n---truncated---"}, {"lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: btrfs: haga que cow_file_range_inline() respete la p\u00e1gina bloqueada en caso de error. La ruta de escritura almacenada en el b\u00fafer de btrfs pasa por __extent_writepage(), que tiene un manejo complicado del valor de retorno para writepage_delalloc(). Espec\u00edficamente, cuando eso devuelve 1, salimos, pero para otros valores de retorno continuamos y terminamos llamando a btrfs_folio_end_all_writers(). Si la publicaci\u00f3n se ha desbloqueado (tenga en cuenta que verificamos el bit PageLocked al inicio de __extent_writepage()), esto resulta en un p\u00e1nico de afirmaci\u00f3n como este de syzbot: BTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in free_log_tree:3267: errno = -5 Fallo de E/S Advertencia BTRFS (estado EAL del bucle 0 del dispositivo): omitir El commit de la transacci\u00f3n abortada. BTRFS: error (EAL de estado de bucle 0 del dispositivo) en cleanup_transaction:2018: errno=-5 Error de aserci\u00f3n de E/S fallida: folio_test_locked(folio), en fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871 ------------ [cortar aqu\u00ed]------------ \u00a1ERROR del kernel en fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871! Vaya: c\u00f3digo de operaci\u00f3n no v\u00e1lido: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 1 PID: 5090 Comm: syz-executor225 No est\u00e1 contaminado 6.10.0-syzkaller-05505-gb1bc554e009e #0 Nombre de hardware: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 27/06/2024 RIP: 0010:btrfs_folio_end_all_writers+0x55b/0x610 fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871 C\u00f3digo: e9 d3 fb ff ff e8 25 22 c2 fd 48 c7 c7 c0 3c 0e 8c 48 c7 c6 80 3d 0e 8c 48 c7 c2 60 3c 0e 8c b9 67 03 00 00 e8 66 47 ad 07 90 &lt;0f&gt; 0b e8 6e 45 b0 07 4c 89 ff be 08 00 00 00 e8 21 12 25 fe 4c 89 RSP: 00033d72e0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000045 RBX: 00fff0000000402c RCX: 663b7a08c50a0a00 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 000000000 0000000 RBP: ffffc900033d73b0 R08: ffffffff8176b98c R09: 1ffff9200067adfc R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff5200067adfd R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 0000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffea0001cbee80 FS: 0000000000000000( 0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f5f076012f8 CR3: e134000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Seguimiento de llamadas: __extent_writepage fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1597 [en l\u00ednea] extend_write_cache_pages fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2251 [en l\u00ednea] btrfs_writepages+0x14d7/0x2760 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2373 do_writepages+0x359/ 0x870 mm/page-writeback.c:2656 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x125/0x180 mm/filemap.c:397 __filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:430 [en l\u00ednea] __filemap_fdatawrite mm/filemap.c:436 [en l\u00ednea] filemap_flush+0xdf/0x130 mm /filemap.c:463 btrfs_release_file+0x117/0x130 fs/btrfs/file.c:1547 __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422 task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:222 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work .h:40 [en l\u00ednea] do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:877 do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1026 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1037 [en l\u00ednea] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1035 [en l\u00ednea] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1035 x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [en l\u00ednea] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 Entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f5f075b70c9 C\u00f3digo: No se puede acceder a los bytes del c\u00f3digo de operaci\u00f3n en 0x7f5f075b709f. Me encontr\u00e9 con el mismo problema al realizar cientos de ejecuciones aceleradas de generic/475, que tambi\u00e9n genera errores de IO por dise\u00f1o. Instrument\u00e9 ese reproductor con bpftrace y descubr\u00ed que el folio_unlock no deseado proven\u00eda de la siguiente pila de llamadas: folio_unlock+5 __process_pages_contig+475 cow_file_range_inline.constprop.0+230 cow_file_range+803 btrfs_run_delalloc_range+566 writepage_delalloc+332 __extent_writepage # ---truncado---"}], "id": "CVE-2024-42266", "lastModified": "2024-08-19T12:59:59.177", "metrics": {}, "published": "2024-08-17T09:15:07.967", "references": [{"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/061e41581606000a83ce0f0f01d6ad338f3704e9"}, {"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/478574370bef7951fbd9ef5155537d6cbed49472"}], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"}

{"bugzilla": {"description": "kernel: btrfs: make cow_file_range_inline() honor locked_page on error", "id": "2305411", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305411"}, "csaw": false, "cvss3": {"cvss3_base_score": "5.5", "cvss3_scoring_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "status": "draft"}, "cwe": "CWE-667", "details": ["In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\nbtrfs: make cow_file_range_inline() honor locked_page on error\nThe btrfs buffered write path runs through __extent_writepage() which\nhas some tricky return value handling for writepage_delalloc().\nSpecifically, when that returns 1, we exit, but for other return values\nwe continue and end up calling btrfs_folio_end_all_writers(). If the\nfolio has been unlocked (note that we check the PageLocked bit at the\nstart of __extent_writepage()), this results in an assert panic like\nthis one from syzbot:\nBTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in free_log_tree:3267: errno=-5 IO failure\nBTRFS warning (device loop0 state EAL): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.\nBTRFS: error (device loop0 state EAL) in cleanup_transaction:2018: errno=-5 IO failure\nassertion failed: folio_test_locked(folio), in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nkernel BUG at fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871!\nOops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI\nCPU: 1 PID: 5090 Comm: syz-executor225 Not tainted\n6.10.0-syzkaller-05505-gb1bc554e009e #0\nHardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS\nGoogle 06/27/2024\nRIP: 0010:btrfs_folio_end_all_writers+0x55b/0x610 fs/btrfs/subpage.c:871\nCode: e9 d3 fb ff ff e8 25 22 c2 fd 48 c7 c7 c0 3c 0e 8c 48 c7 c6 80 3d\n0e 8c 48 c7 c2 60 3c 0e 8c b9 67 03 00 00 e8 66 47 ad 07 90 <0f> 0b e8\n6e 45 b0 07 4c 89 ff be 08 00 00 00 e8 21 12 25 fe 4c 89\nRSP: 0018:ffffc900033d72e0 EFLAGS: 00010246\nRAX: 0000000000000045 RBX: 00fff0000000402c RCX: 663b7a08c50a0a00\nRDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000\nRBP: ffffc900033d73b0 R08: ffffffff8176b98c R09: 1ffff9200067adfc\nR10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff5200067adfd R12: 0000000000000001\nR13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffea0001cbee80\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000)\nknlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 00007f5f076012f8 CR3: 000000000e134000 CR4: 00000000003506f0\nDR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000\nDR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400\nCall Trace:\n<TASK>\n__extent_writepage fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1597 [inline]\nextent_write_cache_pages fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2251 [inline]\nbtrfs_writepages+0x14d7/0x2760 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2373\ndo_writepages+0x359/0x870 mm/page-writeback.c:2656\nfilemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x125/0x180 mm/filemap.c:397\n__filemap_fdatawrite_range mm/filemap.c:430 [inline]\n__filemap_fdatawrite mm/filemap.c:436 [inline]\nfilemap_flush+0xdf/0x130 mm/filemap.c:463\nbtrfs_release_file+0x117/0x130 fs/btrfs/file.c:1547\n__fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422\ntask_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:222\nexit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline]\ndo_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:877\ndo_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1026\n__do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1037 [inline]\n__se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1035 [inline]\n__x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1035\nx64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640\narch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232\ndo_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]\ndo_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\nRIP: 0033:0x7f5f075b70c9\nCode: Unable to access opcode bytes at\n0x7f5f075b709f.\nI was hitting the same issue by doing hundreds of accelerated runs of\ngeneric/475, which also hits IO errors by design.\nI instrumented that reproducer with bpftrace and found that the\nundesirable folio_unlock was coming from the following callstack:\nfolio_unlock+5\n__process_pages_contig+475\ncow_file_range_inline.constprop.0+230\ncow_file_range+803\nbtrfs_run_delalloc_range+566\nwritepage_delalloc+332\n__extent_writepage # inlined in my stacktrace, but I added it here\nextent_write_cache_pages+622\nLooking at the bisected-to pa\n---truncated---", "A flaw was found in the btrfs module in the Linux kernel. Improper locking can occur due to an improper handling of error conditions, causing a kernel panic and resulting in a denial of service."], "name": "CVE-2024-42266", "package_state": [{"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6", "fix_state": "Out of support scope", "package_name": "kernel", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7", "fix_state": "Out of support scope", "package_name": "kernel", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7", "fix_state": "Out of support scope", "package_name": "kernel-rt", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8", "fix_state": "Not affected", "package_name": "kernel", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8", "fix_state": "Not affected", "package_name": "kernel-rt", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9", "fix_state": "Not affected", "package_name": "kernel", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9", "fix_state": "Not affected", "package_name": "kernel-rt", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9"}], "public_date": "2024-08-17T00:00:00Z", "references": ["https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-42266\nhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42266\nhttps://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024081738-CVE-2024-42266-529f@gregkh/T"], "statement": "The btrfs module is not built in the kernel shipped in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 and 9, so it is not affected by this vulnerability.", "threat_severity": "Moderate"}

{"created": "2025-07-12T23:05:55.237245+00:00", "updated": "2025-07-12T23:05:55.237295+00:00", "vendors": ["linux", "linux$PRODUCT$linux_kernel"]}